3SL Cradle vs IBM Rational DOORS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

3SL Cradle
Ranking in Application Requirements Management
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Rational DOORS
Ranking in Application Requirements Management
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Requirements Management category, the market share of 3SL Cradle is 1.3% and it decreased by 30.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of IBM Rational DOORS is 34.8% and it decreased by 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Requirements Management
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Siegmar-Schuenke - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 23, 2022
Flexible solution that manages all your needs
I mainly use 3SL Cradle to manage the requirements from service projects 3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately.  3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities. In the next release, I would like 3SL Cradle to be…
JK
Jul 15, 2022
Good exporting functions, proven scalability, but technical support needs improvement
There are numerous projects that we are using with IBM Rational DOORS. They are isolated from each other and then we receive requirements from outside sources, load them into DOORS, and use them to do traceability into architectures developed in MagicDraw It has improved our ability to do…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately."
"Rational DOORS' most valuable feature is that you can write any kind of requirement you want."
"The solution is stable."
"The next-generation features are good."
"The data logs are ver conveneint."
"It is a stable solution."
"This product can help improve how your organization proceeds through solution development."
"The program is very stable."
"Traceability on requirements for a huge project in an organization is a big gain."
 

Cons

"3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities."
"One thing that I would like to see is a lower-cost version of it that we could use for smaller projects. Sometimes, we do projects for commercial customers who would benefit from something like DOORS, but it's just so expensive. It's just a monster, so a lower-cost version would be the thing that we'd like to see."
"The interface needs an area to be able to type your query and actually be able to find them."
"It could be more user-friendly. It's not a beautiful tool. The user interface is gray. It has only lists inside, and it's horrible when you want to add tables. It's tough to add tables and manage them. It also becomes difficult when you want to add images."
"One of the things that many people complain about is it's hard to manage attributes. For example, tables or figures. This is something that can be improved."
"Rational DOORS' most valuable feature is that you can write any kind of requirement you want."
"The interface is not very user-friendly and has not evolved in a long time."
"Overall, the user experience should be enhanced."
"There are problems with communicating between DOORS and Microsoft Office."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We have to pay for a license. I think it's a one-time payment as my company hasn't notified me about more charges. I don't think it's expensive for large corporations, but it will be costly for an average person."
"I am not sure why it is so expensive, but one license will cost approximately $15,000 in US dollars."
"IBM is a bit too expensive in terms of pricing. Customers are paying a lot for the license, and the price is quite high for this kind of environment. It is quite high as compared to what we can get today with other solutions."
"I think it's expensive because you have to pay for the licenses to IBM and all that and maintain them."
"It is expensive to onboard additional users."
"The licensing cost is too high."
"Licensing fees are billed annually and there is no support included with what I pay."
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Aerospace/Defense Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about 3SL Cradle?
3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately.
What needs improvement with 3SL Cradle?
The support is consistent globally. However, heavier support is provided in certain locations. Improvement in support is necessary. Assistance is available to acquire information and utilize userna...
What is your primary use case for 3SL Cradle?
I mainly use 3SL Cradle to manage the requirements from service projects.
What do you like most about IBM Rational DOORS?
The traceability matrix in DOORS improved our project outcomes. It helps ensure coverage of requirements at different levels, from user requirements to software requirements to test requirements.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational DOORS?
I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive. It was a little bit expensive.
What needs improvement with IBM Rational DOORS?
The modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool like DOORS Next Generation, integrated with Rhapsody. So, integration between Rhapsody modeling and DOORS in the web tool. Another area...
 

Also Known As

Cradle
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NASA, In-Depth Engineering Corporation, Avibras
Infosys, Chevrolet Volt
Find out what your peers are saying about 3SL Cradle vs. IBM Rational DOORS and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.