ABBYY Vantage vs UiPath Document Understanding comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 10, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

ABBYY Vantage
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (6th)
UiPath Document Understanding
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the market share of ABBYY Vantage is 22.4% and it decreased by 6.6% compared to the previous year. The market share of UiPath Document Understanding is 19.1% and it increased by 69.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
Unique Categories:
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
2.3%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Tharun Kp - PeerSpot reviewer
May 2, 2023
A user-friendly solution that is quite easy to integrate with other tools
We are using the solution in our company for extracting details from invoice copies In our company, using the solution, we have seen that overall automation is quite easy. The output and time for developing the process are quite less. It's worth noting that ABBYY Vantage employs both AI and…
Sravan G - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 27, 2024
Helps streamline invoice processes, reduces human intervention, and frees up staff time
The documents we process using UiPath Document Understanding are invoices and purchase orders. The documents are in PDF format. Some documents include handwriting and screenshots. Around 80 percent of the documents processed are completely automated without any human intervention. UiPath Document Understanding helps handle signatures. The call center teams automated a process where they used to manually identify configuration items in service notifications submitted by users. This manual process required a team of more than three people to analyze over 70,000 records per month. To address this inefficiency, we implemented Forms AI to automate the process. This automation has directly benefited end users. UiPath Document Understanding has streamlined invoice processing. Previously, processing invoices was a time-consuming manual process. Employees had to read each invoice, create corresponding entries in SAP and CRM systems, and then route them to accounts payable. This required multiple resources. UiPath Document Understanding automates these tasks, reducing processing time and errors. In the past, a team of more than 10 people was required to manually process purchase orders. Now, thanks to UiPath Document Understanding, only a few people are needed to validate the complete information and resolve any issues. Before UiPath Document Understanding, we used over eight resources to process documents. Each resource could only handle around 20 documents per day, limiting our total daily capacity to 160 documents. However, since implementing automation, we can now process over 600 invoices daily. UiPath Document Understanding helps reduce human error by over 90 percent. UiPath Document Understanding has freed up staff time to work on other projects. Our clients are satisfied with the time to value.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We like the fact that this solution is enterprise-ready, so it can be deployed on-premises, scale it, etc."
"Verification station is a really good feature. It allows part-owners to be able to take a look at what comes out of the tool after a document, such as an invoice, is run through ABBYY. It also allows them to update it if there are any mistakes. So, it kind of gives them a little more control over what goes through the system and lessens the errors."
"The handwriting recognition is very good, as it can recognize handwriting done with pen and paper with at least 70% accuracy."
"The OCR is the best on the market."
"Identifies and extract relevant elements from a document."
"The UI is user-friendly and ABBYY Vantage supports over 100 languages."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to scale for big processes. We are able to process 1 million pages a day. Its accuracy is also very nice. It is a good feature that they have. It is an independent platform, which is its biggest advantage as compared to other solutions. It is also very stable and powerful. It is 100% on time."
"The OTR (Optical Text Recognition) is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"I found UiPath Document Understanding helpful in automating different types of processes. One process can be split into multiple processes or sub-processes. You can also use it for ID management or extracting data from IDs, such as passports or government-issued IDs, which I like."
"Invoice processing is the most valuable feature. Most of my customers use Document Understanding for invoice processing. That's one of the most common use cases. Typically, each customer starts their RPA journey with the finance department because that's the area where you can see the most benefit."
"The best feature, in my opinion, is, we can train the document using a machine-learning classifier."
"For me, the most valuable aspects of UiPath Document Understanding are its time efficiency and minimal human intervention."
"The most valuable feature in UiPath Document Understanding is the identification of the fields column in the PDF documents."
"We can integrate document understanding with other systems and applications."
"UiPath Document Understanding produces a high accuracy rate of 98 percent."
"UiPath enables us to automate manual tasks and duplicate them easily. The processes are highly accurate."
 

Cons

"They should improve the RESTful API side of this solution. Currently, fully RESTful API is not available in the on-prem version, which is really a problem, and we have to work around this limitation. The cloud version already has a fully RESTful API, but the on-prem version doesn't have a fully RESTful API, which is a big mistake. It is easy to solve, but they aren't solving it quicker. They are taking a long time. Nowadays, most people don't go to the interface. They like to use RESTful API."
"The accuracy changes depending on the scenario so you need to test it before committing to this solution."
"The is a long time between application updates."
"They say that they have invoice training or document training where if you put in a certain number of documents of the same type and you fix it once, twice, or a few times, it'll automatically be able to read the same document perfectly without you having to create a layout for it to follow. That has never worked properly for any project, so I just stopped recommending it completely. We spent time trying to test and getting a bunch of invoices to test it with, and in the end, it just didn't do what it needed to. If they fix that or if they can improve on that, that would be great. It will save a lot of time for a lot of people, and it will allow people with less experience with ABBYY to be able to use it."
"ABBYY Vantage is a product that does not include the Arabic language."
"We would like the workflow building within this solution to be more transparent, which would allow us to model the process."
"ABBYY FlexiCapture could improve in the maintenance, and there are some issues. You have to make efforts to do corrections. Additionally, it could be more user-friendly in terms of connecting between different solutions."
"In IRISXtract, we can have master data, and we can set the master data. There are more options for taking any data and comparing it with master data. For a project, they have a dump from SAP for validation. This feature is there in ABBYY, but it is not extensive like IRISXtract. ABBYY is capturing the data, but there are not a lot of options to validate the captured data. It would be helpful if there are more options for validating the captured data in ABBYY FlexiCapture."
"UiPath Document Understanding has challenges with handwriting and screenshots."
"UiPath Document Understanding can improve its handwriting and signature recognition."
"The rising annual licensing cost of UiPath's Document Understanding product is a major turnoff for users."
"The machine learning model needs improvement, as we receive more and more unstructured documents from clients that require a lot of manual validation."
"Document Understanding would be improved with more AI platforms."
"Sometimes we have challenges when we need to read something like a barcode, so we must use the Cisco algorithm to solve the issue, or I have to ask developers for help specifically to capture this kind of information. There are other processes, such as refunds, that we still must do manually because there is no way to use automation to solve this issue."
"The UiPath APIs lack reliable table parsing."
"The extraction can be better. ABBYY FlexiCapture has more capabilities than Document Understanding. It can also extract automatically without training, whereas with Document Understanding, we need to train everything."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this ABBYY FlexiCapture is a bit expensive and the price is based on how many documents have been captured. For example, one or two million captures."
"Its price is a little bit high and can be lower. Its licensing is very expensive. I don't remember exactly, but for each page, it is about four or seven cents, which is too expensive."
"We did not go with the licensed version of this solution."
"Its price should be a little lower. It is a lot higher than the competition, and if they just break the gap a little, then more people might jump onto their product. Their price is definitely a deterrent in the few cases that I remember. They have monthly and yearly options, and if you want, they also have per project and per page options. They do charge extra for different types of installation. They have the standalone, which is pretty straightforward and a lot cheaper than the server installation. Server installation gives you a lot more, and it gives you control over the environment."
"It is expensive as compared to UiPath. We pay for the licensing and the page count."
"You need to purchase user licenses, and you also need to purchase the license for the pages. User licenses are required for your developers to use the developer tools, and you also need to ensure that there is a pool of licenses for the business users so that they can log in and perform their activities."
"It is moderately priced."
"Most of our customers have purchased an annual license and if you have multiple developers from other companies, you can assign the license on a monthly basis to developers."
"I do not know about its price, but for large organizations, UiPath is cheap, whereas, for small organizations, UiPath is high. For example, if 500 licenses are needed for one company, UiPath is cheap. If only 5 licenses are required, UiPath is costly."
"The price for UiPath Document Understanding is a bit expensive."
"UiPath's pricing model is complex and based on AI units, which are consumed during model training and use."
"The cost per license is significant, approaching ten thousand dollars."
"It's expensive, but you can reduce the price per license by getting more licenses. Overall, the pricing is okay."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"UiPath Document Understanding is expensive, with the basic annual package including 6,000 documents and the next package including one million documents, a huge price difference."
"While Robotic Process Automation tools can be expensive, UiPath Document Understanding is no exception."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ABBYY Vantage?
Vantage is flexible and customizable. It's a low-code/no-code tool, so you don't need to get into detailed coding. You can also use AI to accomplish medium-complex tasks.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ABBYY Vantage?
ABBYY's pricing could be improved. I feel like they are losing out on some business because of their pricing. They could expand their customer base by offering more flexible pricing options.
What needs improvement with ABBYY Vantage?
ABBYY's support model could be improved because we get some complaints from customers regarding the amount of time it takes and the kind of responses we get. They also need to improve their profess...
What do you like most about UiPath Document Understanding?
The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Document Understanding?
The product is not very costly in itself. It is part of the normal license. The solution’s cost increases for machine learning or artificial intelligence because we have to go for UiPath Orchestrat...
What needs improvement with UiPath Document Understanding?
Sometimes, when the number of items is very large, the solution doesn't properly identify them. It's not 100% accurate, but it gives an 85% to 90% output. The solution doesn't work properly when to...
 

Also Known As

ABBYY FlexiCapture
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Fujitsu, Plustek, Samsung, Panasonic, M-files
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ABBYY Vantage vs. UiPath Document Understanding and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.