Adobe CQ5 vs FatWire Content Server comparison

Adobe CQ5
Read 1 Adobe CQ5 review
  • 559 Views
  • 476 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
FatWire Content Server
  • 61 Views
  • 45 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Adobe CQ5 and FatWire Content Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: June 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
June 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 787,061 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe CQ5
Ranking in Web Content Management
9th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
FatWire Content Server
Ranking in Web Content Management
33rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Web Content Management category, the market share of Adobe CQ5 is 3.3% and it decreased by 0.9% compared to the previous year. The market share of FatWire Content Server is 0.4% and it increased by 175.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Content Management
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

it_user680385 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 7, 2017
Brand management, Digital Transformation of organization and Most dynamic site.
Experience Management Digital Content Management Content Authoring Multisite Management Brand management, Digital Transformation of organization and Most dynamic site. Even more out of box components, UI designs. 7 Years No No No Customer Service: 9 Out of 10 Technical Support: 9 out of 10…
Read full review
Use FatWire Content Server?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Retailer
10%
Construction Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

Adobe Experience Manager vs Adobe CQ5 Logo
Adobe Experience Manager vs Adobe CQ5
Compared 100% of the time
More Adobe CQ5 Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
June 2024
Adobe CQ5 reportDownload Adobe CQ5 product report
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
June 2024
FatWire Content Server reportDownload FatWire Content Server product report
 

Also Known As

CQ5
No data available
 

Learn More

Adobe
Video not available
FatWire
 

Overview

Adobe CQ web content management provides a browser-based user interface for both business and IT to create interactive, media-enriched, multichannel customer experiences to build an engaging digital presence, drive more effective campaigns and grow online customer communities. 

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Boehringer Ingelheim
Standard Forwarding LLC, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Agilent, Hªttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH, NTT Plala Inc., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Universidad Aut‹noma de Madrid, ArRiyadh Development Authority, Toshiba Corporation, Tata Sky Ltd.
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
June 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: June 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.