AirCheck G3 vs Wireshark comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

AirCheck G3
Ranking in Network Troubleshooting
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Wireshark
Ranking in Network Troubleshooting
4th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Network Troubleshooting category, the market share of AirCheck G3 is 7.1% and it decreased by 31.9% compared to the previous year. The market share of Wireshark is 15.2% and it increased by 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Troubleshooting
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1910559 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 15, 2022
A quick informational tool that is easy to learn
I have used AirMapper twice, but it was mostly just to try it out with a test case. It works, but it is limited for gathering WiFi site survey data. For quick, small, and easy things, it is great and useful. However, it is not for a complete environment, which shouldn't be your main task with this appliance. For example, instead of relying on this tool to do a complete hospital, you should use a more specialized device, and they offer that too. I would like them to modify the interface. The button to change profiles is fairly small. When you have interventions, it is not always possible to have a ballpoint pen or perfect precision touch with it, since sometimes you need to touch it quite a lot when your hands are very dirty. I would like a special pen that is compatible with that responsive screen. That would make it easier. I have used a simulation of the phone apps software on my laptop, but it was more of a hassle. The battery requires current charging in between longer usage as it'll not be able to last through a whole day of using it.
VP
Jul 26, 2023
Excels at analyzing and decoding packet capture files and powerful tool for troubleshooting network issues
One thing that I feel is currently missing in Wireshark is the ability to perform deep analytics on traffic streams after they have been decoded. While it may not be the major use case right now, it would be beneficial to have some sort of leveraging of artificial intelligence or machine learning to automatically detect threats or vulnerabilities based on specific types of network traffic. Predictive analysis of this nature is currently absent in Wireshark. So in future releases, it would be great to see more robust analytics for traffic streams in the next version of Wireshark. One improvement I would suggest is having more graphical representations of network topologies in Wireshark. Currently, when we deploy Wireshark to collect streams, we lack visibility into how different entities are connected at that specific time. Having a network topology view of connected devices, showing the source and destination, would be really beneficial. For example, in DNS troubleshooting, visualizing the network path can help recreate certain issues. Unfortunately, this feature is not currently available in Wireshark.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I also like the remote session and the ability to log in to the device remotely. You can log in to the tester with your computer and can see the screen and operate the tester remotely. This is a very cool function, but it's very advanced."
"The airCheck is the real-time spectrum analyzer to see clients that could be connecting to our network, not just rogue networks out there, but rogue clients and other interference in that particular spectrum."
"It is portable. It is rugged. It comes with a nice case. It has been dropped, but it doesn't break. I don't have a crack screen or anything like that. It has pretty good battery life."
"The ability to push data to Link-Live is really important. On the main screen, you can see all the system parameters, and then you can also go and see all the current systems that are operating. They all have different SSIDs or system identifiers, and you can see all SSIDs that are operating in a certain area. Being able to see that and being able to dive into each one and figure out what frequency it is operating under is valuable."
"The auto-test, channel scanner, packet capture, and Link-Live integration are all crucial features we use regularly. The wired cable tester is also indispensable. We frequently run into problems during cable testing that are hard to pin down. When tracking down a cable problem, you usually need to plug something into the cable and ensure the cable plant is reliable."
"The AirMapper Site Survey on the AirCheck G2 is the most valuable feature. It is really nice to be able to upload the maps remotely to the website, and then have the analyst upload the results so we can review the data."
"It has made our networking staff more productive. We spend less time because the device helps us by identifying the issue and providing a solution for the customer. Prior to not having this device, we would have to guess when an issue arose. Now, we don't have to guess. This can easily save us hours per call."
"The information provided by the solution for resolving connectivity and performance problems is very thorough. The reporting functionality is extremely good as I can pass that information on with little input. The device will identify issues and problems, e.g., the diagnostic material. When you have Internet access, it sends the information to your email address, which is very useful."
"Being able to dissect email data and figure out what is inside email messages was the most valuable feature. Such a feature is pretty helpful for an ongoing forensic investigation or when there is a potential insider threat that you are trying to investigate. It allows you to see the network activity of the users you are investigating. It also gives you more visibility into your network. It was very easy to set up. There is a lot of information out there on Google and YouTube about how to use it. There is also community support. If you have any trouble, it is pretty easy to find an answer online. You will have to do some digging only if you have a very specific use case."
"Wireshark's best feature is that it's adaptive, which means it's the go-to tool for network-related developers."
"You can use Wireshark to see the traffic packet format, the IP layers, the fields, and the enabled flags."
"I can save the traffic and analysis when I want to. Also, it's especially helpful to follow the stream (TCP, UDP, etc.)."
"The session-level filtering features are valuable."
"It is a stable product. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The filter option provided by Wireshark is its most valuable feature...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The product is simple to implement."
 

Cons

"NetAlly has been behind the curve on visualization, Wi-Fi design, and heat maps for a little while now. They're perfectly aware of this deficiency, but what they offer is good enough for a lot of people. It's not suitable for larger shops, but it works in a pinch. The AirMapper and subsequent AirMagnet integration is an afterthought."
"The battery life needs improvement. For example, when you are doing an Ethernet test, that seems to drain the battery pretty quickly."
"We use .1x authentication, so I need to download the certificate onto the device. It would be nice to have this functionality through the cloud as well. Right now, you need to do it through the software by connecting your laptop physically to the AirCheck. This is one thing that is a bit slow."
"The biggest improvement would be an easier upload over wireless to Link-Live. Currently, the device has to be patched into the Ethernet. The wireless upload has been giving us some issues."
"It was hard to determine which AP was which because it only shows the MAC address. It'll also display the MAC address of the BSSID, so it looked like I had 12 APs in my house. If I have three access points and each is a dual-band with an SSID or BSSID for each radio, it comes out to about 12 APs. That's one of the bugs fixed in the latest firmware update, but it's only available if you have a NetAlly support contract."
"If it was capable of downloading MIBs onto the device, then we could identify the manufacturer. Sometimes, when I am troubleshooting, there is a Mac address. For example, there is a rogue device and it just gives us a Mac address, which is fine. It gives us something, which is better than nothing. It would be nice if it was able to download a MIB where we could associate it with that Mac address and the manufacturer."
"The only thing that would be an improvement would be the ability to do MPO/MPT testing, which is another mode of fiber, along with more options on the SFP to do that testing."
"I would like them to modify the interface. The button to change profiles is fairly small. When you have interventions, it is not always possible to have a ballpoint pen or perfect precision touch with it, since sometimes you need to touch it quite a lot when your hands are very dirty. I would like a special pen that is compatible with that responsive screen. That would make it easier."
"There is a disadvantage when it comes to sampling intervals. Additionally, I've heard from a colleague that Wireshark might be less effective in the voice domain."
"The system could be improved upon by adding a better and more powerful data processing engine."
"We would like the product to be developed so that it doesn't rely on internet access for installation. We would like to see all of the components required to be integrated into the installer."
"Wireshark is restricted when any sort of encryption is involved, such as XSL encryption or DLX."
"I would like to see Wireshark improve the ease of application of the command. The command is very powerful, but not easy to apply."
"The only thing that I don't like is sometimes there is an update, and something that I was using is either no longer there or it has changed."
"It is not an easy program. You will need to study to use it to its full capabilities (follow a course)."
"The product is great but I wish there were more of an emphasis on the command line tools."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has a pretty good price."
"It costs $3,000. It would be nice if its cost was less. I could then buy more. Currently, when we buy one, we make sure that where we need it is big enough, or if it is too small, when a person has a job, they have to get a temporary one mailed to them to use, which becomes a little less convenient."
"The overall cost of the solution, compared to the time saved—the number of man-hours devoted to other means of troubleshooting—is incomparable."
"For a few thousand dollars, you save yourself a ton of time. It's a great deal."
"If you find a feature you need, you have to call them and add it, but you should be able to use the product. You spend money on and invested in multiple devices and can't even use half of the features. They should negotiate with large enterprises who buy large numbers of units to provide NetAlly support for all of them at a nominal fee."
"The price is fairly expensive, if you are a single individual. For me, it's well worth the cost of the unit. Depending on the nature of the work that you're doing, the upfront costs can be expensive. Typically, what happens in an environment is a department might have one device as opposed to technicians having them individually."
"Because I work in a big company, it is a no-brainer. If I were a consultant, I would still buy it, but it would be a huge investment. Overall, it's a good tool to have."
"The upfront cost of the solution is around $4,000."
"I am using the free version of this solution."
"Wireshark is free software, so you can download it and use it for free with no licensing fees."
"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."
"We're using the free version of Wireshark."
"Wireshark is open source and gives great value and functionality to the network investigation."
"Wireshark is open-source and free of charge."
"It's a stand-alone tool. If there is a commercial license for it I am unaware of it."
"Wireshark is free software, so you don't have to pay any licensing fee. Individual people can use it and then donate to Wireshark."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Troubleshooting solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
Computer Software Company
14%
University
11%
Educational Organization
11%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AirCheck G3?
The airCheck is the real-time spectrum analyzer to see clients that could be connecting to our network, not just rogue networks out there, but rogue clients and other interference in that particula...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AirCheck G3?
The upfront cost of the solution is around $4,000. This cost does not include service contracts for support.
What needs improvement with AirCheck G3?
The solution doesn't have much functional information online. Most of the information online is regurgitated from marketing brochures. I purchased the solution for a job and sold it afterward becau...
What needs improvement with Wireshark?
I wish the filters were a little bit more prepopulated. It would have been easy to hit a drop-down and select a filter. If I only wanted to look at DCP, UDP, or IP, it would be easy to filter it ou...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

AirCheck G2, AirCheck
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Comversion, ADP, Talbots
Find out what your peers are saying about AirCheck G3 vs. Wireshark and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.