We performed a comparison between Anomali ThreatStream and Fortinet FortiSIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Microsoft, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick."
"It's easy to manage. There's a web interface and a command line, depending on what the user is comfortable with. There's a large knowledge base available, and the support is timely."
"The event correlation is pretty robust. The GUI is pretty good."
"The ability to write my own parsers for the devices that are not supported by Fortinet is the most valuable feature."
"It gives us the opportunity to generate notifications based upon rules that get triggered, and the rules could be specific to PCI, HIPAA, GIBA, NIST, and so forth."
"Some of our customers who use this solution have seen improvement in their connection with load balancing on both connections."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM is less costly than other products and is available 24/7."
"AccelOps can handle a lot of data and it's just so important to true monitoring. Also, I can create a lot of rules to detect anything I like."
"The interface is very easy to use. The connector in the core has FortiSIEM support from the vendor."
"Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM could improve by having better integration and extensions. This would benefit by allowing us to give more rules."
"The biggest thing that could be better is a quicker response to support cases."
"They need to integrate better with Cisco and Palo Alto."
"It would be good if the solution offered even more configuration options, especially in relation to the VPN so that it continues to be a very flexible option."
"The nodes on our network did not comply with the SIEM solution. They use a different format parking log."
"The interface needs some improvements because it's a bit cumbersome when you're trying to view items. It takes some time to get used to. Additionally, sometimes the scrolling does not work."
"I would like to see easier implementation in the future."
"The policy editing should be easier. Right now, it's too hard."
Anomali ThreatStream is ranked 6th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review while Fortinet FortiSIEM is ranked 10th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 65 reviews. Anomali ThreatStream is rated 7.0, while Fortinet FortiSIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Anomali ThreatStream writes "Easy and quick credential monitoring; tech support could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSIEM writes "It's cheaper than other solutions with the same features but lacks integration with many third-party vendors". Anomali ThreatStream is most compared with Recorded Future, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), ThreatQ, Splunk Enterprise Security and Group-IB Threat Intelligence, whereas Fortinet FortiSIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, Microsoft Sentinel and LogRhythm SIEM.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
