Apache Flink vs SAS Event Stream Processing comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Flink
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAS Event Stream Processing
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Streaming Analytics category, the market share of Apache Flink is 12.0% and it increased by 7.9% compared to the previous year. The market share of SAS Event Stream Processing is 0.6% and it increased by 141.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Streaming Analytics
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Sunil  Morya - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 18, 2022
Easy to deploy and manage; lacking simple integration with Amazon products
The issue we had with Flink was that when you had to refer the schema into the input data stream, it had to be done directly into code. The XLS format where the schema is stored, had to be stored in Python. If the schema changes, you have to redeploy Flink because the basic tasks and jobs are already running. That's one disadvantage. Another was a restriction with Amazon's CloudFormation templates which don't allow for direct deployment in the private subnet. You have to deploy into the public subnet and then from the Amazon console, specify a different private subnet that requires a lot of settings. In general, the integration with Amazon products was not good and was very time-consuming. I'd like to think that has changed.
Roi Jason Buela - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 18, 2022
A solution with useful windowing features and great for operations and marketing
It is used for operations and marketing The most useful feature is the windowing feature because you can select how long to keep the record in the memory. For example, you can use windowing if you want to identify a transaction based on a two-second or five-second interval. The persistence could…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Apache Flink is meant for low latency applications. You take one event opposite if you want to maintain a certain state. When another event comes and you want to associate those events together, in-memory state management was a key feature for us."
"It is user-friendly and the reporting is good."
"It provides us the flexibility to deploy it on any cluster without being constrained by cloud-based limitations."
"The setup was not too difficult."
"Easy to deploy and manage."
"Another feature is how Flink handles its radiuses. It has something called the checkpointing concept. You're dealing with billions and billions of requests, so your system is going to fail in large storage systems. Flink handles this by using the concept of checkpointing and savepointing, where they write the aggregated state into some separate storage. So in case of failure, you can basically recall from that state and come back."
"Apache Flink's best feature is its data streaming tool."
"Apache Flink allows you to reduce latency and process data in real-time, making it ideal for such scenarios."
"The solution is beneficial on an enterprise level."
 

Cons

"Amazon's CloudFormation templates don't allow for direct deployment in the private subnet."
"We have a machine learning team that works with Python, but Apache Flink does not have full support for the language."
"There is a learning curve. It takes time to learn."
"Apache Flink's documentation should be available in more languages."
"The machine learning library is not very flexible."
"PyFlink is not as fully featured as Python itself, so there are some limitations to what you can do with it."
"In terms of stability with Flink, it is something that you have to deal with every time. Stability is the number one problem that we have seen with Flink, and it really depends on the kind of problem that you're trying to solve."
"Apache Flink should improve its data capability and data migration."
"The persistence could be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's an open source."
"Apache Flink is open source so we pay no licensing for the use of the software."
"It's an open-source solution."
"The solution is open-source, which is free."
"This is an open-source platform that can be used free of charge."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
17%
Retailer
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Flink?
The product helps us to create both simple and complex data processing tasks. Over time, it has facilitated integration and navigation across multiple data sources tailored to each client's needs. ...
What needs improvement with Apache Flink?
Apache Flink should improve its data capability and data migration.
What do you like most about SAS Event Stream Processing?
The solution is beneficial on an enterprise level.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Event Stream Processing?
Regarding licensing, I believe since it's on-premises, it's on a per-core basis annual basis. I think there is also an option to license per transaction. Licensing depends on the client and may vary.
What needs improvement with SAS Event Stream Processing?
The persistence could be better. Although ESP is designed for in-memory processing, it would be better if the solution is enhanced or improved on the persistence of the data that is kept in the mem...
 

Also Known As

Flink
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LogRhythm, Inc., Inter-American Development Bank, Scientific Technologies Corporation, LotLinx, Inc., Benevity, Inc.
Honda, HSBC, Lufthansa, Nestle, 89Degrees.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Databricks, Microsoft and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.