Appium vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Appium and Ranorex are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. Appium is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.3, while Ranorex is ranked #7. Appium holds a 3.3% mindshare in RTT, compared to Ranorex’s 7.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Appium users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

Appium

Read 30 Appium reviews

2,288 Views
961 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

2,913 Views
1,923 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Appium

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Ranorex Studio and Appium are both in the test automation category, offering distinct advantages. Ranorex Studio appears more accessible for non-technical users due to features like recording, playback, and the Ranorex Spy, while Appium is more appealing to budget-conscious teams needing flexibility and open-source solutions for mobile testing.

Features: Ranorex Studio provides a comprehensive feature set including user-friendly recording and playback, the Ranorex Spy for element identification, and support for C# and VB.NET. It integrates with CI/CD tools like Jenkins and supports desktop, web, and mobile applications. Appium stands out for its open-source nature, supporting multiple programming languages like Java and Python. It's designed for automating native and hybrid mobile apps across Android and iOS platforms.

Room for Improvement: Ranorex Studio could improve by enhancing support for non-Windows operating systems, increasing modularity, and advancing object recognition capabilities outside .NET environments. Appium users indicate the need for easier setup processes, especially on iOS, and improvements in stability and support documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ranorex Studio is mainly deployed on-premises, with reliable technical support, although timezone challenges exist for global users. Appium offers flexible deployment options, including on-premises and cloud environments, but could benefit from more responsive support despite its strong community-driven basis.

Pricing and ROI: Ranorex Studio requires a financial commitment due to licensing costs, which can be significant for smaller companies. However, users find its pricing justified by the robust features and support, offering substantial ROI through time-saving automation. Appium is cost-effective with no licensing fees, making it attractive for budget-focused teams looking to integrate mobile automation into existing setups. It provides significant ROI by supporting extensive, free, mobile test automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Appium vs. Ranorex Studio Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Appium vs. Ranorex Studio

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,697 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Appium

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (7th)

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (19th), Mobile App Testing Tools (10th), Test Automation Tools (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Regression Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Appium is 3.3%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 7.9%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Regression Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Appium	3.3%
Ranorex Studio	7.9%
Other	88.8%

Regression Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Abhishek-Tiwari

Senior Associate at PwC

Has cross-platform flexibility and a record-and-play option

The challenging part with Appium is that installation can be a bit tricky. It can be challenging to set up in Android versus iOS environments. Appium has some limitations in terms of writing code using simulators and online cloud devices. I faced challenges with native based scenarios, battery turn out percentage, battery charging percentage, and memory capacity. The other challenge I faced involved codes changing from device to device. For example, the piece of code that works in iOS version 10.1 won't work in iOS version 6.0. In upcoming releases, if they can reduce some more of the dependencies like SDK, UIAutomator, etc., it would be great. That is, I'd like to see a consolidated package or bundle release that is much more user-friendly.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution helps with test automation. We focus mostly on Java."

"We get a list that shows all devices that are connected to the system."

"The way Appium server interacts with mobile apps is fantastic. It provides all the information about the elements inside the app, Android as well as iOS. I can interact with the element quickly, just type some text or get some text values from the element - whether it's a drop-down, or web text, or a native element."

"We develop apps using the React Native framework, and Appium integrates well for testing those apps. The Appium automation framework also has good integration with GitHub Actions and plenty of other tools and frameworks, including BrowserStack."

"Appium's best feature is that it supports multiple frameworks."

"The library is extensive so the driver interacts with most functions or actions on mobile devices."

"It runs completely flawlessly and seamlessly every day."

"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to launch applications. Appium has everything that Selenium has. So many good tools support Appium. We can take some Excel sheets and use them to fill out the text box that's in there. We can also take screenshots of failures."

More Appium pros

"The solution is stable."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"We haven't been able to fully leverage Appium for multiple reasons. I think number one is just that the tests take a long time to run. We have had some issues around just the results themselves and how predictable they are, but those are not issues with Appium directly."

"We need some bug fixes for nested elements."

"What needs improvement in Appium is its documentation. It needs to give more context on the libraries that Appium is using under the hood. For example, my team is using Appium for Android automation, and a lot of times, I feel that there's functionality that's available through the Appium interface, that exists within the UIAutomator, but there aren't a lot of useful or helpful resources on the internet to find that information, so it would be good to have some linkage with the underlying platform itself. Another room for improvement in Appium is that it's buggy sometimes. For example, at times, there's a bug in the inspector application that doesn't allow me to save my desired capability set, so it would be nice to get that bug fixed, but overall, Appium is a good tool. The Touch Actions functionality in Appium also needs improvement. For example, if I want to initiate a scroll on the device that I'm running Appium on, sometimes Swipe works, but in other situations, I have to explicitly use action chains, so I'm not too sure what's the better approach. What I'd like to see in the next version of Appium is a more intelligent and more intuitive AppiumLibrary, in terms of identifying menus and scroll bars, etc., because right now, I'm unsure if I have to do a lot of export reversals to get to the elements I'm looking for. It would be nice to have some functionality built in, which would allow me to easily get those exports."

"The challenging part with Appium is that installation can be a bit tricky. It can be challenging to set up in Android versus iOS environments."

"Configuration-wise, there is a lot of room for improvement."

"An application developed on the Unity platform, such as a gaming application, objects are moving in that case. Interacting with those elements is still lacking in Appium. Appium doesn't have the internal library to play with the Unity platform. That is a huge lack right now."

"If it had more facility for configuration it would be a spectacular solution."

"The setup and installation were a problem for us at first."

More Appium cons

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open source so it is free."

"As far as I know, Appium is a free solution. It's not for commercial use."

"We found out that we could explore features of the solution for 30 days trial. We can switch to a permanent license later if we want."

"Appian is open-source, which is not licensed."

"The solution is free."

"Appium is open source; we can use it for free."

"This is an open source solution so it does not cost anything for licensing or otherwise."

"The solution is open source."

More Appium pricing and cost advice

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Appium?

I do recommend Appium. It is an open-source solution and completely free of charge. We use Appium and Appium Studio as our base for any type of mobile automation for testing. It has a great interfa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Appium?

Appium helps me to do as much as much as I want to.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Appium?

My experience with Appium from a pricing perspective is favorable due to it being open source, making it a cost-effective option.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Perfecto vs Appium

Compared 22% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Appium

Compared 12% of the time

Qt Squish vs Appium

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Appium

Compared 11% of the time

Eggplant Performance vs Appium

Compared 5% of the time

More Appium Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 22% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 13% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 12% of the time

Original Software TestDrive vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 3% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Appium

October 2025

Download Appium product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

September 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Overview

Appium is an open-source mobile application development tool that is designed to give users complete control of their application development process. It enables them to optimize the development process when the need calls for it, and create the applications that they want in the most efficient manner they can.

Appium Benefits

Some of the benefits that come from using Appium include:

Ease of deployment. Appium is fairly simple for users to set up for the first time. Developers can download Appium and launch it with only a couple of clicks.

Easily track the results of application tests. Appium automatically creates reports when developers run application tests. These reports can give users insights into every aspect of the tests that they just ran. They can include detailed test results, screenshots of the test as it took place, and videos showing the test while it was in progress. Developers can also recall these reports with ease so that the information that was gathered is always at their disposal.

Gain deep insights into your application. Users can easily gain insight into the way that their application is running and how it might be improved. The reports that the system produces can provide developers with all of the data and insight that they need to improve their applications and make informed decisions.

Appium Features

When users choose to employ Appium’s mobile development solution, they gain access to many different capabilities. These features include:

Remote testing capability. Teams that are spread across the globe can collaborate and run tests from wherever they happen to be at the time. They can connect to Appium’s cloud testing feature and always have access to the latest iteration of the project they are working on.

Customizable test reporting capability. Appium enables users to customize the way that information from their tests is reported. They can create the kinds of reports that best reflect their objectives and needs. When specific information is needed, the reports can be formatted to show that particular aspect when the solution generates it.

Parallel testing capabilities. Developers who use Appium can run multiple application tests at the same time. This enables them to save time and resources while still accounting for every scenario that their applications might experience. Users can run all of the tests necessary to ensure that their applications are successful while spending the minimum amount of time doing so.

Reviews from Real Users

Appium is a solution that has a great deal to offer its users. It is a very complete mobile development solution that gives users the capabilities that they need to design their mobile applications with the greatest level of ease possible. Users can scale their application scripts to meet their needs. Additionally, developers can automate testing protocols, which reduces the amount of time and other resources that need to be devoted to the testing process. These two features make Appium a leader in the field of mobile application development.

Jayanta K., automation and nft manager at a computer software company, writes, “The interface for mobile automation is helpful for scripting and execution. It's scalable and there are many testers who would like to automate. In terms of scripting, scalability is very good.”

The head of solutions delivery (systems) at a wellness & fitness company writes, “Obviously, because of automation, it reduces manual testing efforts.”

Appium

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

Nuvizz, Coupa Software, Eventbrite, Evernote

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Appium vs. Ranorex Studio

September 2025

Free Report: Appium vs. Ranorex Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Appium vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Appium vs. Ranorex Studio report.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.