ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

ARCON Privileged Access Man...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
16th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CyberArk Privileged Access ...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
144
Ranking in other categories
User Activity Monitoring (1st)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the market share of ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS is 0.2% and it increased by 19.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is 22.3% and it decreased by 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
User Activity Monitoring
22.2%
 

Featured Reviews

AN
May 4, 2023
Helps to manage human, digital and machine identities
We use the solution to manage identities that include human identities, machine identities, digital identities, and API integrations.  The tool's architecture is thin and scalable. We also like the product's ease of deployment. My company is also impressed with the solution's number of connectors.…
reviewer0275214 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 13, 2023
Good reporting and MFA with easy integration capabilities
In my organization, we are using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager to enhance the security of an organization's critical systems, mainly by securing privileged accounts (e.g. administrator passwords, SSH keys, and API tokens).  We are also using Cyber-Ark for access control by ensuring that only…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's architecture is thin and scalable. We also like the product's ease of deployment. My company is also impressed with the solution's number of connectors."
"Within the solution, I love the fact that everything is recorded. The configuration capabilities are great, too."
"It has the ability to scale out. We have scaled out quite a bit with our product and use of it to get to multiple locations and businesses, so it has the breadth to do that."
"The product is for hardening access and making the organization more secure, therefore reducing chances of a breach."
"All of the features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager are valuable."
"You can easily manage more than 4000 accounts with one PSM."
"The fact that I can put my vault here in a central location on one net for example, and I'll have a CPM in California, a CPM in Texas, a CPM in New York, a CPM in Florida, and actually be able to grow with my company and not necessarily have to continue to grow my vault until I get to a certain number accounts - yet I can still manage everything across the country, if not the world - I love that. I love the flexibility and the capability of being able to pull those components out."
"Automates password management to remove the human chain weakness."
"What I found most valuable in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is the Session Manager as it allows you to split the connection between the administrator site and the target site. I also found the Password Manager valuable as it lets you rotate the passwords of privileged users."
 

Cons

"The tool needs to improve its pricing."
"The current user interface is a little dated. However, I hear there are changes coming in the next version."
"Tech support staff can be more proactive."
"There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution."
"The initial setup was a bit complex."
"It can be made user-friendly, in the sense of the console is pretty outdated."
"It needs better documentation with more examples for the configuration files and API/REST integration"
"CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms."
"The tool’s pricing and scalability can be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the product's pricing a seven out of ten. We are using the yearly license."
"The solution is very expensive and requires a license. We pay for an enterprise license."
"The solution is available at a high price"
"It is not a cheap solution. It is expensive as compared with other solutions. However, it is one of the best solutions in their domain."
"Previously, the pricing was very meager. They started publicizing and advertising the solution, growing CyberArk, as an organization. They also changed their pricing with that growth, e.g., the pricier the product, the more people who will purchase it."
"The main problem for the tool is its licensing. I work for a really big company. When you try to develop this as a service, usually you work with leverage teams who are formed with dozens of members. You might dedicate one FTE, or less, for something, e.g., an antivirus administrator. You might have half an FTE's effort dedicated to administering the antivirus, but then you have a team of about 30 users who might access that ticket. The problem is that CyberArk eliminated the possibility of concurrent users years ago. This is a big problem for companies who work with leverage teams. You need to pay for everyone. 40 licenses are used by 20 or 30 people. This is a big problem because licenses are not precisely cheap."
"I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product."
"In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
31%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS?
The tool's architecture is thin and scalable. We also like the product's ease of deployment. My company is also impressed with the solution's number of connectors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS?
I would rate the product's pricing a seven out of ten. We are using the yearly license.
How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?
We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...
What do you like most about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
The most valuable features of the solution are control and analytics.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager comes at a high cost. But the solution is worth its price.
 

Also Known As

ARCON PAM SaaS
CyberArk Privileged Access Security
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

RAK Bank, AXIS Bank, Reliance Capital, Kotak Life Insurance, MTS
Rockwell Automation
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.