AWS Security Hub vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #16 in CSPM , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 3.9% mindshare in the category. OpenText is ranked #21 in SIEM , with an average rating of 6.8, and holds a 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Security Hub

Read 26 AWS Security Hub reviews

7,113 Views
3,130 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Read 98 OpenText Enterprise Security Manager reviews

2,954 Views
2,865 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AWS Security Hub

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager ESM and AWS Security Hub are major contenders in the cybersecurity landscape. Users have expressed greater satisfaction with AWS Security Hub's scalability and ease of integration, indicating it may have the upper hand.

Features: ArcSight ESM offers comprehensive threat detection, incident management, and robust functionalities. AWS Security Hub provides seamless integration with AWS services, enhancing operational efficiency and scalability.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight ESM needs better analytics, more frequent updates, and improved user interface. AWS Security Hub users suggest enhancing multi-tenancy support, advanced customization options, and reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight ESM's deployment can be complex and time-consuming, but customer service is responsive. AWS Security Hub features a quicker deployment process and benefits from AWS's extensive customer service resources.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight ESM's initial setup costs are high but justified by its extensive feature set. AWS Security Hub's pricing is more competitive; users achieve ROI sooner due to lower ongoing costs and faster time to value.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Security Hub vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 880,901 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th)

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (21st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS Security Hub is designed for Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and holds a mindshare of 3.9%, down 4.6% compared to last year.
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager, on the other hand, focuses on Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), holds 1.6% mindshare, up 1.1% since last year.

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Security Hub	3.9%
Wiz	16.6%
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks	9.6%
Other	69.9%

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager	1.6%
Splunk Enterprise Security	7.4%
Wazuh	7.3%
Other	83.7%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Karthik Ekambaram

Director at Scybers

Has helped identify misconfigurations and prioritize risks but lacks multi-cloud support and deeper integration features

AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS. There are other products in the market for CSPM that can give you multi-cloud environment misconfigurations, even Microsoft for that matter. Regarding the integration of AWS Security Hub with third-party tools, I am not certain whether we can integrate them, but there is no need to do so. However, AWS Security Hub cannot integrate with other cloud providers, so it only supports the AWS environment. The compliance checks within AWS Security Hub are good, but we don't use them much. We utilize compliance frameworks such as CIS compliance frameworks and ISO 27017 framework, which are beneficial, but it can improve in other areas too, such as including NIST and other frameworks beyond just ISO and CIS. Improvements can be applicable for scalability, particularly on integration with multi-cloud environments, and compliance frameworks can be added for more variety as well. The unified dashboard in AWS Security Hub is adequate; I cannot say it is exceptional, but the content available in the dashboards is satisfactory for now.

Read full review

Namdev Magar

Senior Security Engineer at Valuepoint Systems

Interpreting data effectively despite challenges in integration and support

If someone lacks the budget for a new SIEM tool with advanced capabilities, I would recommend ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM). However, if they have the budget, I would suggest looking into other options. Overall, I would give ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) a rating of seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution shows us our compliance score."

"I rate Security Hub ten out of ten for stability."

"The platform has valuable features for security."

"I find all of the features to be highly valuable."

"The most beneficial aspect of Security Hub is its proactive capability, allowing us to identify potential security issues before they escalate."

"Within AWS Security Hub, there is a feature for aggregating and prioritizing security findings which allows for better risk prioritization based on misconfiguration, as they know AWS thoroughly."

"The advantage is that it is cloud-native, and we do not need to install agents or sensors to find findings."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to manage...It is a scalable solution."

More AWS Security Hub pros

"Stable solution with good customer service support."

"The most useful features are directories, price, and live reporting."

"This process has helped to improve our organization because we have centralized the intra-group security equipment logs."

"I really like the correlation part and the way the logs are correlated. I have never faced issues with parsing in this product. I like the way it parses, and everything is so clear to me."

"It prevented my users from getting infected by ransomware. It can also pinpoint the story behind every virus or network attack to our environment."

"It gives better overall visibility. Before, we didn't have a unified system for managing security alerts. ArcSight introduced various alerts, giving us a better visibility of potential problems."

"The stability of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager is good."

"The reports that we are from getting from ArcSight are very valuable. The reporting in ArcSight is good. Our regulators ask us for the reports on a regular basis, and we have been able to provide the required data. Its overall functionality in terms of log analysis and the speed at which it does that is also valuable. It is very quick. Whatever alerts we had configured were extremely fast. We immediately get alerts when there is unauthorized access or unknown access, or even positive access. This is where we found the difference between ArcSight and other solutions."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pros

Cons

"The solution will only give you insight if you have configure rule enabled. It should work more like Prisma Cloud and Dome9 which have a better approach."

"AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS."

"It's not user-friendly. Too much going on, too many unnecessary findings, not very visual. You can't do much compared to other similar tools that are cheaper and better."

"AWS Security Hub's configuration and integration are areas where it lacks and needs to improve."

"AWS Security Hub should improve the time it takes to update. It takes a long period of time when updating. It can take 24 hours sometimes to update. Additionally, when integrating this solution with more security tools, takes time."

"Security needs to be measured based on their own criteria. We can't add custom criteria specific to our organization. For example, having an S3 bucket publicly available might be flagged as a critical alert, but it might not be critical in a sandbox environment. So, it gets flagged as critical, which becomes a false positive. So, customization options and creating custom dashboards would be areas for improvement."

"I would like a more fine-grained capability for creating custom rules and a more user-friendly experience programmatically in writing queries and configuring custom security rules, making it quicker and easier."

"From an improvement perspective, there is a need to add more compliance since, right now, AWS Security Hub only provides four to five compliances to control the tool."

More AWS Security Hub cons

"The security area has room for improvement."

"The correlation engine effectively connects different events, significantly improving our detection reach. However, limitations exist with non-default alerts, where additional costs arise for integration."

"They also could improve the product by integrating user and identity behavior analytics."

"Its search part can be improved. When I go to the console and search for a few logs or something else, it takes a lot of time. When I try to search for three days or one week, it takes too much time. This is a major area of improvement. I wanted them to include features like SOAR, threat intelligence, and automation, and they seem to have included all these features in version 7.3 or 7.4."

"Administration of ArcSight is not an easy job. The admin needs to be well experienced in it to identify the root cause and fix it."

"The initial setup is very complex. We had to architect a deployment which allowed us to incorporate an ever growing number of customers into our hosted instance of ArcSight."

"Could benefit from a more modern interface."

"We would like the ability to easily identify either unused resources or those that are being used sub-optimally."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are multiple subscription models, like yearly, monthly, and packaged."

"The cost is based on the number of compliances, core checks, and services required, and for more than 10,000 recommendations, the charge is just one dollar."

"The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions."

"The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable."

"AWS Security Hub's pricing is pretty reasonable."

"Security Hub is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing is fine. It is not an expensive tool."

"AWS Security Hub is not an expensive tool. I would consider it to be a cheap solution. AWS Security Hub follows the PAYG pricing model, meaning you will have to pay for whatever you use."

"The solution is super expensive. At our organization size and license model, I think the price is average to what anyone else would charge us."

"We have a license to use this solution. The price of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager is expensive."

"The pricing is great compared to others."

"There is a license required for this solution."

"Pricing is good, I'd rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being low price. It's better than Splunk and IBM QRadar because their pricing is based on EPS."

"The product licenses are inexpensive."

"It's a good price, it's one of the cheaper solutions."

"ArcSight can be a little bit expensive because of the area that we work in and the cost. Licensing is mostly on a yearly basis, not monthly."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 28, 2015

Qradar vs. ArcSight

Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	37
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	57

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?

We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Security Hub?

The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?

See all answers

Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?

In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

We utilize ArcSight ESM for real-time threat detection in our organization. We have custom rules that we've developed on top of the WAN services, along with scheduled licensing activities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools. It is worth the investment if you are considering the cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 35% of the time

Wiz vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 9% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Security Hub Competitors

Trellix ESM vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 11% of the time

SurfWatch Labs SurfWatch vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub

January 2026

Download AWS Security Hub product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

January 2026

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager report

Download OpenText Enterprise Security Manager product report

Also Known As

SQRRL

Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight

Overview

AWS Security Hub is a comprehensive security service that provides a centralized view of security alerts and compliance status across an AWS environment. It collects data from various AWS services, partner solutions, and AWS Marketplace products to provide a holistic view of security posture. With Security Hub, users can quickly identify and prioritize security issues, automate compliance checks, and streamline remediation efforts.

The service offers a range of features including continuous monitoring, threat intelligence integration, and customizable dashboards. It also provides automated insights and recommendations to help users improve their security posture. Security Hub integrates with other AWS services like Amazon GuardDuty, AWS Config, and AWS Macie to provide a unified security experience. Additionally, it supports integration with third-party security tools through its API, allowing users to leverage their existing security investments.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful capabilities, AWS Security Hub is a valuable tool for organizations looking to enhance their security and compliance posture in the cloud.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager enables real-time threat detection through scalable and adaptable solutions, integrating seamlessly with multiple platforms for complex security scenarios across different environments.

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers extensive security monitoring capabilities, combining log analysis and incident management to enhance cybersecurity and compliance. Its powerful event correlation engine provides real-time alerts for rapid incident response. Users benefit from customizable dashboards and comprehensive log collection, making it a significant tool in the SIEM market. Flexible deployment options cater to both on-premises and cloud environments, supporting enterprises in managing IT infrastructure and threat detection efficiently.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?

Event Correlation Engine: Real-time threat detection with advanced correlation capabilities.
Scalability: Adapts to enterprise-level demands and complex security needs.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with multiple platforms and third-party tools.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailored views and active lists enhance user experience.
Advanced Alerting: Provides timely incident response and security alerts.

Why should users look for reviews when evaluating OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?

Timely Incident Responses: Fast alerting and action against threats.
User-Friendly Experience: Customizable dashboards simplify monitoring tasks.
Comprehensive Security Management: Integrated log management and threat detection across domains.
Adaptability and Scalability: Supports both on-premises and cloud deployments.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and energy, OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is implemented for monitoring critical systems and ensuring compliance with regulatory needs. Enterprises leverage its capabilities for forensic investigations and active threat management, serving as a central hub for cybersecurity operations across diverse IT infrastructures.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com

Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

October 2024

Free Report: AWS Security Hub vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Security Hub vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager report.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.