

Asana and Freshservice are competitive in providing project and IT service management solutions. Freshservice has the upper hand due to its cost-effective pricing and strong ITSM capabilities, while Asana excels in intuitive project management features.
Features: Asana includes task management with My Tasks, task commenting, and several project views, which enhance adaptability and collaboration. Freshservice is known for its help desk efficiency, offering incident management and automation workflows, with emphasis on ITSM needs, seamless integration, and mobile accessibility.
Room for Improvement: Asana could improve notifications, task automation, and integration flexibility, lacking advanced features like custom dashboards. Freshservice may enhance workflow customization, reporting, and asset management, with users citing limitations in automation granularity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Asana and Freshservice are commonly deployed on public clouds. Although Asana users report varying support experiences, Freshservice receives high ratings for prompt customer service and problem-solving efficiency, supporting diverse cloud environments.
Pricing and ROI: Asana offers accessible pricing with a free version but requires payment for advanced features. Freshservice provides flexible and cost-effective pricing despite regional differences. Both report positive ROI, with Asana focusing on task efficiency and Freshservice on ITSM processes.
Because of Asana, we are not having sprint planning meetings very much. That alone has saved us about 10 hours per week.
There is no need to juggle multiple conversations across different platforms, and the search engine works effectively, allowing for pulling up historical data efficiently, which ensures all pertinent information is available.
However, due to its pricing, I need to be careful about adding each user and feature.
Faster resolution means the average ticket resolution time decreased by roughly twenty-five to thirty percent since alerts are automatically converted into tickets and routed to the right team.
Automation has contributed significantly, resulting in reduced resource counts, which equates to savings in money and time.
With using Freshservice, only two technicians are needed per one shift, but without Freshservice, for the same company size, we need about four technicians per shift, so it saved money and time.
The technical support is of high quality.
No complaints have been heard about customer support for Asana.
The customer support for Asana is good.
Ultimately, we saw a 77% reduction in average resolution times with a return on investment realized within 6 months.
However, they have improved over the period of two years.
Their documentation is also good, making setup easy without needing frequent support requests.
Asana's scalability is impressive, as the organization has grown from one facility in California to another in Washington State, increasing the workforce from one hundred to about four hundred fifty to five hundred people without any scalability issues throughout a four hundred million dollar construction project.
Asana's scalability is pretty good because it is cloud-hosted and I know companies with thousands of employees use it.
As our organization has grown and ticket volume related to AWS resources increased, Freshservice handled the extra load without any performance issues.
It offers global performance with multi-region data centers to ensure faster responses while adhering to strong security and compliance standards such as GDPR and SOC 2.
Freshservice is easy to use for scalability.
I have not experienced any stability problems with Asana.
Asana is quite stable; it is a tool I can trust.
Asana is stable.
The service runs smoothly most of the time, and performance has been consistent even when ticket volumes and AWS alerts are high.
Freshservice is quite stable as they host it on AWS.
Freshservice provides a stable environment for our needs.
It would be easier if I could assign tasks directly from my email without needing to open Asana.
This UI is good for a power user, but for a normal user who just comes to see what their tasks are, a simplified UI would be more appropriate.
It would be beneficial to have a native option for Asana to create tickets so we could move away from our main ticketing tool.
There's limited experience with the CMDB or asset management features.
Asset management can definitely be improved because it doesn't pick up every single device on the network or every single piece of information.
Reporting is useful, but the customization is still restricted, and it would be great to build more detailed reports that combine multiple data sources, especially for cloud-related operations.
To add one user is expensive, which makes me cautious about upgrading or adding more users.
Switching from previous ITSM tools has led to a 50% reduction in licensing costs.
The solution offers flat licensing and appears to be cost-effective.
The price was very comfortable for our organization to proceed with the migration from Freshdesk to Freshservice.
Asana's automation allows me to automate deadlines and send notifications to the right people about approaching deadlines.
Asana has positively impacted the organization by providing clarity for everyone, allowing visibility into who is working on what, from the VP of Operations down to maintenance, ensuring necessary parts are available.
The easy way to get all the analytics at the end of the month or year is the most important feature, and that's why we are still with Asana.
The most valuable features include ticket routing, automation in triage, data control, and flat licensing.
Incident management is very helpful, and the system is straightforward, making it easy to use for our enterprise-level company.
Overall, Freshservice provides cutting-edge AI automation for agents and end-users, effortless no-code workflows and ITIL-aligned operations, robust asset, incident, change, problem, and major incident management backed by the live CMDB, unified service desk with self-service and multi-channel support, and strong analytics reporting features, making it a powerful tool for any IT function.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Asana | 2.9% |
| Freshservice | 0.8% |
| Other | 96.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Asana is web-based software-as-a-service that helps teams coordinate and manage their work. It helps companies move faster by making sure everyone knows the team’s plan and process and who is doing what by when.
Each user can create projects using a list, board, calendar, or timeline view. Within each project, users can add tasks, subtasks, sections, comments, attachments, start and due dates, and custom fields. Project and task followers get notifications on changes or comments on the project and/or task in their Inbox. Individual users can see all of the tasks they're responsible for across all of their projects in a view called My Tasks.
Asana is available in English, French, Spanish, German, and Portuguese.
Freshservice is an intelligent, cloud-native service management solution. It provides efficiency and agility through AI to create a contextual and intelligent experience. The solution also empowers employees to work whenever and wherever they need to work. Freshservice powers integrations and workflows at the enterprise scale, building upon an open platform and marketplace with connectors and APIs that you can extend and customize.
Freshservice Features
Freshservice has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Freshservice Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Freshservice. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Freshservice solution.
A Senior Helpdesk at a non-profit says, “I like the workflow automation capabilities, where based upon certain actions, it will automatically go and route tickets to a particular person. It is fairly user-friendly.”
PeerSpot user Cesar Q., CIO at Grupo Kasto, mentions, “The analytics are very good. The solution offers very nice incident management. The overall functionality of the product is excellent. The change management is helpful. They have an agent that we installed in every single asset. We have the inventory for all assets automatically. Contract management is very valuable for us as an IT department, as we have the information for every single computer across the company. We are starting to use the project management aspects right now. We have different projects and we have all the information in the same solution, in the same place. It makes everything more centralized and easier to access. The user interface is very nice and the solution is easy to use. You don't need to be an expert in order to navigate around and use the product. You don't need to read a lot of manuals in order to figure everything out. It's pretty intuitive.”
A Network Analyst at a real estate/law firm shares, "We find its ability to track what's going on with each request very valuable. We are also able to merge ticket requests and assign them to different groups in the company. We have another department that uses the same system."
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.