Asset Panda vs Device42 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Asset Panda
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (33rd)
Device42
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
IT Asset Management (4th), Configuration Management Databases (2nd), IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools (4th), Data Center Infrastructure Management (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Asset Panda?
Share your opinion
ON
Apr 13, 2023
Helps with network scanning and the discovery of asset management
The tool helps with network scanning and the discovery of asset management.  We faced outages in the data center before implementing Device42. The tool has improved it and helped us with asset management.  I like the tool's agentless discovery feature. The tool configures the devices based on the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The problem with using other vendor, like BMC, is the pricing. The price is so horrible and nobody wants to pay this money."
"We pay $100,000 per year."
"It's in the top-three most expensive solutions in terms of cost, but it has all the features that are needed."
"Functionality-wise, Device42 is on par with industry standards, but price-wise, the solution is expensive. I'm rating the pricing for the solution as eight out of ten."
"I am not involved in its pricing, but I have seen their plans during a discussion with the customer. For 500 servers, they were asking 50,000 USD. The cost of BMC Discovery was less than half. For the same thing, they were charging only 10,000 USD. Its pricing needs to be improved. As compared to other discovery tools, such as BMC Discovery and ServiceNow Discovery, its price is a little bit higher."
"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."
"The product cost is low. It is quite cheap."
"On a yearly basis, our licensing is $10,000. However, our license is now nearly full with devices. We need the next bigger license with 5,000 devices, which will cost us $19,000. We pay for a set of licenses, a maximum number of devices, and a maximum number of IP addresses. We have the smallest amount of features, which is enough for us at this time."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Device42?
Based on the use case for Device42, I found the solution a bit expensive. However, when you look at the support and the industry standards, Device42 was on par with the industry. Device42 is a litt...
What needs improvement with Device42?
The product must provide AI features. It would be very useful if I could create datasets or queries from an AI interface.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

The Gazette, University of Connecticut, Karma Rescue, British Red Cross, Buckle, Dave & Buster's
Computershare, Concur, Doosan, Fitch Ratings Inc., Fujitsu, HomeAway, Jasper Wireless, Mercedes-Benz, Square, Twitch, UCSB, Zayo Group Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.