Ataccama ONE Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Ataccama and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Ataccama is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. Ataccama holds a 2.5% mindshare in DG, compared to Microsoft’s 22.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 6 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

1,989 Views
1,313 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Read 58 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews

19,586 Views
16,256 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Ataccama ONE Platform and Microsoft Purview Data Governance compete in the data governance domain. Ataccama ONE Platform stands out for its robust integration and customer support, while Microsoft Purview Data Governance excels with a comprehensive feature set and value for price.

Features: Ataccama ONE Platform offers advanced data quality management, comprehensive data profiling, and seamless integration with other systems. It supports efficient data automation, enhancing data management processes. Microsoft Purview Data Governance provides strong integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, features extensive data cataloging capabilities, and includes advanced data lineage tracking. Its detailed classification rules and compliance tracking enhance governance across various environments.

Room for Improvement: Ataccama ONE Platform could refine its reporting features and documentation for better usability. Increasing customization options and expanding native integrations would also be advantageous. Microsoft Purview Data Governance may improve its customer support response times, simplify its initial setup process, and extend its usability beyond the Microsoft environment for broader appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ataccama ONE Platform is known for its straightforward deployment and effective customer support. Microsoft Purview Data Governance benefits from seamless integration with Microsoft's suite but may require more complex initial setup. While both offer robust customer services, Ataccama ONE Platform receives better feedback for support quality and responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Ataccama ONE Platform is considered cost-effective, offering strong ROI with lower initial setup costs, making it suitable for organizations balancing cost and capabilities. Microsoft Purview Data Governance demands higher upfront investment, but perceptions of long-term ROI, especially for enterprises using Microsoft tools, often validate its expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (4th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (4th)

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Ranking in Data Governance

1st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 22.1%, down from 24.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

AmrNaeem

Manager, Service Delivery & Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It helps us by reporting on and auditing leaks and breaches

One important feature is data security, which both end users and the organization seek. Microsoft Purview offers data protection across a multi-cloud and multi-platform environment. It's critical that Purview connects to iOS, Mac, and Android. We could only secure some of our data if it only covered Windows. It provides a comprehensive view of the entire ecosystem's threats and compliance in real time. It's very easy to use. Purview's compliance features are crucial. We have to match some cases in other countries to our own to comply with the policies, procedures, and regulatory frameworks here.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The data classification part of the solution is excellent, especially as it gives us an insight into our sensitive data within Microsoft 365."

"The custom classifications are one of the most valuable features."

"Has a good interface and is reasonably priced."

"We can prevent, block, or audit however we like."

"I think Purview does as good a job...I'll say that it is as stable as the data governance maturity that exists within an organization. It can't be more stable than that."

"Purview's ability to connect to iOS, Mac, and Android devices is critical."

"Microsoft Purview offers data protection across a multi-cloud and multi-platform environment."

"My favorite features are eDiscovery and insider risk management, because these are the major threats to an organization that can't be easily traced."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

Cons

"Data movement is a pain."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"Two features are unsupported—custom insights and the DLP component—that would be beneficial to me as a consultant and for the customer in terms of security and monitoring. Regarding security, DLP would provide a more granular level of data masking. Custom insights would offer more detailed monitoring and alerts that can notify customers of failures or anything requiring urgent action."

"The current event-based retention management is very poor."

"Setting up Purview in a production tenant proved challenging due to a lack of clear documentation on permission requirements."

"There are some non-Microsoft file formats that are not supported."

"The support could be better, particularly with consulting."

"As Microsoft Purview got a little more mature, the deployments got a little more complex, as we were kind of seeing that there are a lot of ways, like there were a hundred ways to do one thing or less."

"The technical support has room for improvement."

"The standard support is acceptable, but sometimes it doesn't respond fast enough. Overall, it doesn't meet our expectations."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"I would rate the cost of Microsoft Purview a six out of ten with ten being the most expensive."

"Some people find the tier licensing system complicated, but it offers a lot of value for money if we use the features."

"Purview's price is pretty high when you factor in storage costs."

"People often and unjustly say that Microsoft product pricing is not in the scope of reality, that it's just too expensive at times. I do not feel that is the case at all... If I'm able to let go of 30 to 70 percent of my IT administration staff, that makes up for a lot of money."

"The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."

"Microsoft Purview has a pay-per-use pricing model, so it's one of the most cost-effective tools, as your cost will be based on your usage. It's a pricing model that Microsoft has nailed down, making it great whether you're a small organization or a multinational, giant organization."

"The pricing is decent. It is neither too low nor too high. Given its capabilities, the pricing is justified."

"The pricing is reasonable because it's part of the 365 E3 or E5 license you buy."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?

It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs. It allows for a cost-effective start with negligible initial cost. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

There should be more clarity about the costing, particularly how the cost is calculated, especially when utilizing health reports and quality features. Additionally, adding more tools around data q...

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 18% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Atlan vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

Collibra Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 18% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 15% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 10% of the time

Collibra Lineage vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 8% of the time

erwin Data Intelligence by Quest vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

July 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

June 2025

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform is a comprehensive data management and governance solution designed to address the challenges faced by organizations in managing and leveraging their data assets. Its primary use case is to enable organizations to gain control over their data, improve data quality, and ensure compliance with data regulations.

The most valuable functionality of Ataccama ONE includes data profiling, data quality management, data integration, master data management, and metadata management. These features allow organizations to understand the quality and structure of their data, integrate data from various sources, create a single view of their master data, and manage metadata to ensure data lineage and governance.

By leveraging Ataccama ONE, organizations can achieve several benefits. Firstly, it helps in improving data quality by identifying and resolving data issues, ensuring accurate and reliable data for decision-making. Secondly, it enables organizations to streamline data integration processes, reducing the time and effort required for data integration projects. Thirdly, it facilitates effective master data management, enabling organizations to have a consistent and accurate view of their critical data entities. Lastly, it helps organizations in complying with data regulations by providing data lineage, data privacy, and data governance capabilities.

Ataccama

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

June 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.