AWS Application Migration Service vs HPE Zerto Software comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.5, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.9. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 5.1% mindshare in CM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

AWS Application Migration S...

Read 7 AWS Application Migration Service reviews

377 Views
324 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Read 341 HPE Zerto Software reviews

13,362 Views
534 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

AWS Application Migration S...

HPE Zerto Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 11, 2025

Zerto and AWS Application Migration Service compete in the disaster recovery and migration category. Based on user feedback, Zerto appears to have the edge with its more comprehensive feature set and near-zero RPO capabilities.

Features: Zerto offers real-time replication, seamless integration with VMware and vCenter Server, and a user-friendly interface that requires minimal daily interaction. It provides hardware independence and supports migrations across different sites with nearly zero RPO. AWS Application Migration Service allows migrations with minimal downtime, is free to use, and costs are tied to AWS resources used. It supports a wide range of workloads, ensuring efficiency and reliability during migrations.

Room for Improvement: Zerto needs enhancements in backup capabilities, more detailed reporting, and licensing flexibility. Users are also asking for better automation tools and advanced encryption. AWS Application Migration Service would benefit from improved logging, more transparent reporting, and clearer cost structures to enhance user satisfaction and financial predictability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zerto deploys easily across on-premises, private, and hybrid clouds, with excellent customer service and responsive support. AWS Application Migration Service offers straightforward hybrid cloud deployment and a customer support experience that ensures seamless service execution.

Pricing and ROI: Zerto’s per-VM pricing model is considered expensive but is justified by its robust features and ROI through time and downtime savings. AWS Application Migration Service's model ties costs to AWS resource usage, offering a cost-effective solution for businesses needing scalable migration capabilities without upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Application Migration Service vs. HPE Zerto Software Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Application Migration Service vs. HPE Zerto Software

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,445 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Application Migration S...

Ranking in Cloud Migration

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Cloud Migration

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

341

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Backup (3rd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of AWS Application Migration Service is 5.1%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 6.7%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE Zerto Software	6.7%
AWS Application Migration Service	5.1%
Other	88.2%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Dieudonné-Nsabimana

Consultancy Manager at cidns

Integration with other services has improved migration efficiency

A valuable feature is the schema conversion tool, which allows me to migrate databases, for example, from Oracle to Postgres. The service is fully managed by AWS, which makes it better to use the migration services. It is beneficial to enable phased migration, and the service offers easy integration with other AWS services. The integration of AWS Application Migration Service with AWS makes it a good tool for working with AWS services.

Read full review

Sachin Vinay

Assistant Manager-Networks at Amrita

Leverage disaster recovery with reliable support and cost-effective future-proof features

Zerto is straightforward to implement because it only requires the installation of an agent on the VMs designated for migration. A service, typically a VM, must also be deployed at the disaster recovery location. This entire process is simple and can be completed within three days. Zerto's near-synchronous replication occurs every minute, allowing for highly granular recovery points. This means that even if interruptions or malware disruptions occur within that minute, Zerto can restore to the last known good state, effectively recovering the entire setup to the latest backup. This capability ensures high data security and minimizes potential data loss. One of the main benefits of implementing Zerto is its data compression, which significantly reduces the load on our IPsec VPN. Zerto compresses data by 80 percent before transmitting it across the VPN, minimizing the data transferred between geographically dispersed locations. This compression and subsequent decompression at the destination alleviate the strain on the VPN, preventing overload and ensuring efficient data synchronization. Zerto simplifies malware protection by integrating it into its disaster recovery and synchronization features. This comprehensive approach eliminates the need for separate antivirus setups in virtual machines and applications. It streamlines our security measures and removes the need for additional software or solutions, resulting in an excellent return on investment. Zerto's single-click recovery solution offers exceptional recovery speed. Through the user interface, a single click allows for a complete restoration from the most recent backup within two to three minutes, enabling rapid recovery and minimal downtime. Zerto's Recovery Time Objective is excellent. In the past, if a virtual machine crashed, we would recover it from a snapshot, which could take one to two hours. With Zerto, the recovery process takes only five minutes, and users are typically unaware of any disruption. This allows us to restore everything quickly and efficiently. Zerto has significantly reduced our downtime. When malware affects our data, Zerto immediately notifies us and helps us protect other applications, even those not yet implemented with Zerto. By monitoring these applications, we can quickly identify and address any potential malware spread, minimizing downtime across our systems. Zerto significantly reduces downtime and associated costs during disruptions. Our services are unified, so in the event of a disruption without Zerto, even a half-day disruption would necessitate offline procedures. This would lead to increased manpower, service delays, and substantial financial losses due to interrupted admissions and other critical processes. By unifying service processes, Zerto minimizes the impact of outages. Zerto streamlines our disaster recovery testing across multiple locations by enabling efficient failover testing without disrupting live services. Traditionally, DR testing required downtime of critical systems, but Zerto's replication and failover capabilities allow us to test in parallel with live operations. This non-disruptive approach ensures continuous service availability while validating our DR plan, even in scenarios like malware attacks, by creating a separate testing environment that mirrors the live setup. This comprehensive testing provides confidence in our ability to handle real-world incidents effectively. This saves us over 60 percent of the time. Zerto streamlines system administration tasks by automating many processes, thereby reducing the workload for multiple administrators. This allows them to focus on other university services that require attention and effectively reallocate support resources from automated tasks to those requiring more dedicated management. Zerto is used exclusively for our critical services, providing up to a 70 percent improvement in our IT resilience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"I rate AWS Application Migration Service a nine out of ten overall."

"AWS Application Migration Service allows us to perform migrations with minimal downtime, which is crucial for our operations."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the solution's support a ten out of ten."

"Live Migration's best feature is that it's free."

"The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication."

"HPE Zerto Software has improved our RPO and RTO."

"For most use cases, the failover time is a handful of minutes, if that. A single user can run the system."

"The whole package is valuable. The most useful feature for the company is the rapid RTO, which offers a faster return to operations and brings us back online quicker. The last time we had an issue, we recovered within about 36 minutes, which was probably the most valuable thing for us because, previously, it took four to seven days."

"The solution's most valuable features are its user interface, ease of implementation, and ease of execution."

"It helps us keep our required retention period for specific documents and allows us to recover older documents if we have to compare and recreate those."

"There are several valuable features because of the way we use it. The backup and restore features are definitely indispensable."

"Zerto is 400 times better."

"Four years ago when we did a PoC between two other vendors and Zerto, there were two features of Zerto that sold it, hands-down. One was the ease of creating protection groups, the ease with which our engineers could create protection, add virtual machines into the Zerto product, and get them under DR protection."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

Cons

"I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure."

"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."

"I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud."

"The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps."

"There are some features in the Migration Factory that could be integrated directly into AWS Application Migration Service."

"One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud."

"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."

"The VPG model causes us a bit of concern. We are considering using Zerto to replace Site Recovery Manager. Site Recovery Manager is very easy when we have entire data scores being replicated. We don't have to make any decisions when it comes to groupings. It is all covered. If we move to Zerto, which we are considering, we will have to work much closer with the applications teams to develop the VPG configuration and determine how the VMs will be grouped. It will be a lot more overhead for us to go that route."

"This solution could be improved by including some sort of compression or de-duplication for the same type of files."

"There are a couple of areas in the interface that are not very intuitive. Most of them are pretty easy, but there are a few areas in the journal and replication that, unless you've done it before, you really have no idea what to do."

"If I were to nitpick, I would say that I wish I had a better account manager. Our sales guy has changed a couple of times. I would like a little more responsiveness from our account manager. I've had a couple of issues where getting in touch with him has been a little difficult, and I end up just going around him and dealing with support and support has handled it right away."

"If we have multiple VMs in a VPG (Virtual Protected Group) and one VM is hung for DR, it holds things up. The only alternative is to create multiple VPGs. It would be nice to have one VPG where, if one VM is failing, it does not impact the overall process."

"It has a file restore feature, which we have tried to use. We have had some issues with that, because the drives are compressed in our main file system. It is a Windows-based file server. So, it compresses the shares and can't restore those by default."

"I would like Zerto to provide more detailed information when there is an issue."

"The number one thing we have found we would like changed so far is the cost per VM. It would be great to get that pricing reduced."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Live Migration's price is good."

"For me, the price of the tool is cheap and very good. It is flexible pricing since you pay just for what you use."

"While we find the twenty-five VM license somewhat inflexible, the actual setup costs are minimal as the product is so easy to install."

"In a world where others are catching up, e.g., VMware High Availability, there needs to be a less expensive option as well. When a customer has approximately 100 VMs, if you multiply by 40, we aren't charging a very high margin on it at all since the license is so expensive. We feel their pain. That is the most expensive part of it. The storage, CPU, and RAM are a lot less. It is the licensing that is really expensive. Whereas, with an option like VMware High Availability, it is a couple dollars per month. That is our spend that we are charged by VMware, then our margin is higher on those VMs. Giving us some ability to have higher margins, as an MSP, would be a good thing."

"It is not a bad pricing model."

"Pricing depends on your future growth. Start small and then scale up."

"Zerto's pricing is competitive, given the benefits and ease of setting it up. It may seem more expensive upfront, but you're going to save that over the long term by spending less engineering time configuring, reconfiguring, etc."

"The pricing is based on virtual machines. They need to do better in regards to their tiering pricing rather than one price per VM. A lot of times we have VMs that are lower tier, such as Tier 2 or Tier 3, but we pay the same price as for Tier 1. I know they are developing this out, but it would be nice if they could provide a little better pricing in regards to their tiering protection."

"There may be less expensive solutions on the market but with Zerto, you get what you pay for."

"If it were easier to license, and to scale it out a little bit more economically, that'd be a godsend. At the end of the day, my druthers would be to have all 200 of our servers protected by this platform. But for a company our size, that stretches our IT budget and it just doesn't make economic sense."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	91
Midsize Enterprise	85
Large Enterprise	193

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Live Migration?

The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps. Furthermore, I noticed that performance can vary with the source and t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Live Migration?

For the moment, I am using AWS Application Migration Service for database migration. The first use case involves moving from on-premise to EC2 hosts. Additionally, I have worked with multi-region r...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudEndure Live Migration?

The service is not complicated; I find it easy to use. For those considering AWS Application Migration Service, the advice depends on their specific needs. If it involves database migration, especi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing, I think on the pricing side, I don't generally deal with it, but from what I hear from my finance team, it's somewhat on the higher...

See all answers

Comparisons

Racemi Cloud Path vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 45% of the time

OpenText Migrate vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 31% of the time

More AWS Application Migration Service Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 8% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

August 2025

AWS Application Migration Service report

Download AWS Application Migration Service product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

September 2025

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Live Migration

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

AWS Application Migration Service minimizes time-intensive, error-prone manual processes by automating the conversion of your source servers to run natively on AWS. It also simplifies application modernization with built-in and custom optimization options.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Buyer's Guide

AWS Application Migration Service vs. HPE Zerto Software

September 2025

Free Report: AWS Application Migration Service vs. HPE Zerto Software

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Application Migration Service vs. HPE Zerto Software and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Application Migration Service vs. HPE Zerto Software report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.