We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Huawei Cloud WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."We do not have to maintain the solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to integrate central sets. It protects from intrusion attacks such as scripting and SQL injections."
"The agility is great for us in terms of cloud services in general."
"The interface is good."
"As a basic WAF, it's better than nothing. So if you need something simple out of the box with default features, AWS WAF is good."
"The security firewall plus the features that protect against database injections or scripting,"
"I believe the most impressive features are integration and ease of use. The best part of AWS WAF is the cloud-native WAF integration. There aren't any hidden deployments or hidden infrastructure which we have to maintain to have AWS WAF. AWS maintains everything; all we have to do is click the button, and WAF will be activated. Any packet coming through the internet will be filtered through."
"AWS WAF is something that someone from a cloud background or cloud security background leverages. If they want to natively use a solution in the cloud, AWS WAF comes in handy. It's very useful for that, and the way we can fine-tune the WAF rules is also nice."
"The most valuable feature of Huawei Cloud WAF is its ease of use."
"AWS WAF could improve by making the overall management easier. Many people that have started working with AWS WAF do not have an easy time. They should make it easy to use."
"They should work to define more threats, add more security, and make it more compliant with more security companies."
"I would like to see it more tightly integrated with other AWS services."
"They have to do more to improve, to innovate more features. They need to increase the security. It has to be more active in detecting threats."
"The cost must be reduced."
"The price could be improved."
"I would like to see the addition of more advanced rate-limiting features in the next release. It would be beneficial to extend rate limiting beyond just web servers to the main node level."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"It would be good if the solution's feature set could be expanded to mirror what currently exists on the public cloud."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Huawei Cloud WAF is ranked 30th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Huawei Cloud WAF is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei Cloud WAF writes "Easy to use, but its feature set could be expanded to mirror what currently exists on the public cloud". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Huawei Cloud WAF is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.