Axonius vs Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Axonius
Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management
27th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (1st)
Bitsight Third-Party Risk M...
Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Leo Frank - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2024
Makes your entire life easier when you want to know where each asset is
Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error. But we are still sorting out our segregation for assets as well. However, Axonius can't pull out the exact reports, but there is a way around this, where we can use the built-in queries. For example, we have CentOS systems, and within CentOS, we have tagged assets with vulnerabilities, but these assets do not appear in Axonius. As an alternative, what we do for this is write a query to find the vulnerability of assets that are tagged within CentOS systems. I would say both the tool and the user must work together to get good results.
Alfredo Alvim - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 23, 2024
Provides comprehensive insights into security posture
Bitsight provides comprehensive insights into security posture, enabling us to effectively reduce risks. it increases the security of writing and reduces the risks We work directly on their website to define all the assets that we need to scan. We have some meetings with the manager. For example,…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."
"The product helps us identify the vulnerabilities of internet-facing applications."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"Offers open ports from an external point of view."
"Its customer service team responds quickly."
"I prefer BitSight due to its patch management capabilities. The score is a valuable feature. I have contacted the customer support through e-mail and their response rate is fast. I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
 

Cons

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."
"The solution’s benchmarking should be improved."
"Data enrichment is the major issue."
"At the moment, when the vulnerability score decreases, it remains the same for quite a while, even though issues are resolved in 24 hours."
"Its factor analysis feature could be better."
"There may be room for improvement in the methodology for identifying findings, as occasional errors occur on the technical side."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are on a subscription model with them."
"The product has a reasonable price."
"The solution's price is average."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Insurance Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BitSight?
The product is a little expensive and very oriented to large companies.
What needs improvement with BitSight?
We face difficulties in acquiring designs and findings. There may be room for improvement in the methodology for identifying findings, as occasional errors occur on the technical side of BitSight.
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera
Fannie Mae, Cabela's, BNP Paribas, PWC, AIR Worldwide, Con Edison, The Container Store, OshKosh, Steris, University of South Florida, Emblem Health, Lloyds Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, BitSight and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.