Azure Bastion vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Bastion
Ranking in Microsoft Security Suite
17th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (32nd), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (9th)
Microsoft Defender for Clou...
Ranking in Microsoft Security Suite
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (2nd), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (12th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Microsoft Security Suite category, the market share of Azure Bastion is 1.7% and it increased by 21.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is 1.3% and it decreased by 24.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Microsoft Security Suite
Unique Categories:
Network Monitoring Software
0.1%
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
0.7%
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)
14.5%
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
1.1%
 

Featured Reviews

Aladin Steiner - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 28, 2023
Has good scalability and provides secure access to the virtual machines
Our customers use the product to connect to Azure virtual machines. It is a perfect solution that they can easily connect to the browser and experience the VM services Azure Bastion makes it easy to provide quick virtual machine access to our customers. We don’t have to build complex SSL VPN…
EW
Apr 7, 2023
It helps us control which applications are used and gain more security insight into remote and hybrid users based on user identity and login location
Defender integrates with MDE, and there's no agent, so everything happening on the endpoint is reported back to Defender. Defender for Cloud Apps is tightly integrated with Defender for Identity. The solution provides excellent visibility into threats. I rate Defender for Cloud Apps an eight and a half out of ten for visibility. I use all of Microsoft's security products, and they work together natively to deliver coordinated detection and response. Each solution is outstanding by itself, and I can coordinate between them by pumping the alerts and incidents into my SIEM. Bidirectional sync is crucial because I'm a consultant, and I have yet to find a customer who uses only one cloud. We use Defender with Microsoft Sentinel, which ingests data from our entire ecosystem. This functionality is essential because I can investigate threats and respond from one place. I can respond directly from Sentinel about 50-60 percent of the time using its SOAR capabilities. Sentinel's built-in UEBA and threat intelligence are excellent and getting better every day. In terms of cost and ease of use, Sentinel is the best cloud SIEM and better than 90 percent of on-premise solutions. Even Google products can't compete.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The interface is available in the edit portal."
"As an Azure consultant, for me, it is the best way to give the administrator access as you can manage the permission - including who can access Bastion."
"Azure Bastion makes it easy to provide quick virtual machine access to our customers."
"The product's setup is easy."
"The ability to operate the product with scripting is excellent."
"It provides all the security to us. Without getting on the internet, we can access our servers. We can access our desktop through our web browser. We don't need to run the mstsc command and login to the VM. All those things are not required."
"The connection to virtual machines is very useful."
"The most significant advantage lies in its runbook features, particularly beneficial for our infrastructure team."
"Shadow IT discovery is the feature I like the most."
"The product helps us with privileged identity management to control who has access to what and for how long."
"It's very easy to install and it includes the Intune portal from Microsoft where I can control all the devices from one place."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of management. It's important."
"I like the web GUI/the management interface. I also like the security of Microsoft. As compared to other manufacturers, it's less complex and easy to understand and work with."
"I like the alert policies because they are quite robust. It has some built-in templates that we can easily pick up. One of them is the alert for mass downloads, when a particular user is running a massive download on your SharePoint site."
"The most valuable feature is the alerting system."
"The solution does not affect a user's workflow."
 

Cons

"When you have a boot issue on Windows, you cannot use Azure Bastion to fix it. You have to use the Azure console or the VM console, and it is very limited."
"We are not able to copy and paste files directly into the server over the patch host. We have to transfer files over to Azure Storage."
"The solution breaks down sometimes."
"There are some challenges because Bastion is more compatible with Edge but not with the other browsers. As an organization, it doesn't make sense that we have to use only Edge. We should be able to access Bastion over Chrome, Mozilla, or Opera. It should be our choice."
"While general support is valuable, having a detailed breakdown of the specific issues would contribute to a more streamlined and efficient resolution process."
"The protocol speed could be faster."
"You are charged for retrieving your own data."
"Generally, the pricing can always be improved along with the management system."
"Defender could integrate better with multi-cloud and hybrid environments. It requires some additional configuration to ingest data from non-Azure environments and integrate it with Sentinel."
"Currently, reporting is not very straightforward and it needs to be enhanced. Specific reports are not included and you need to run a query, drill down, and then export it and share it. I would love to have reports with more fine-tuning or granularity, and more predefined reports."
"The integration with macOS operating systems needs to be better."
"I would like to see them include more features in the older licenses. There are some features that are not available, such as preventing or analyzing cloud attacks."
"We sometimes get errors when we create policies, which is somewhat annoying because some policies stop working due to misconfigurations. We find this challenging because it limits our options for troubleshooting an issue."
"There are challenges with detection and there are challenges with false-positive rates."
"We would like to get more information from the endpoint. I don't get enough detailed information right now on why something failed. There is not enough visibility."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a lower decision point than high-quality security for our organization. Better security comes at a cost, but it's worth it, and that's what we tell our customers."
"It does not save money for us."
"Azure Bastion's pricing is good."
"It has pretty good pricing."
"Our clients normally use the Microsoft E1 licensing, which is renewed yearly."
"The product's pricing seems fair."
"I'm not totally involved in the pricing part, but I think its pricing is quite aggressive, and its price is quite similar to Netskope. Netskope has separate licensing fees or additional charges if you want to monitor certain SaaS services, whereas, with MCAS, you get 5,000 applications with their Office 365. It is all bundled, and there's no cost for using that. You only have the operational costs. In the country I am in, it is a bit difficult to get people with the required skill sets."
"Its pricing is on the higher side. Its price is definitely very high for a small-scale company. As an enterprise client, we do get benefits from Microsoft. We get a discounted price because of the number of users we have in our company. We have a premier package, and with that, we do get a lot of discounts. There are no additional costs. It only comes in the top-tier packages. Generally, the top-tier license is the best license that you can get for your organization. If you want, you can buy it separately, but that's not a good idea."
"We are an MST and we do not pay for the solution. However, the price of the solution could be better."
"It is a little bit expensive. When you want to have the complete package with Office 365, Defender, and everything else, it is expensive."
"The price could be better and should be reconsidered."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Microsoft Security Suite solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Bastion?
Azure Bastion makes it easy to provide quick virtual machine access to our customers.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Bastion?
The product costs around $150 per month. It does not save money for us.
What needs improvement with Azure Bastion?
We are not able to copy and paste files directly into the server over the patch host. We have to transfer files over to Azure Storage.
Which is the better security solution - Cisco Umbrella or Microsoft Cloud App Security?
Cisco Umbrella is an integral component of the Cisco SASE architecture. It integrates security in a single, cloud-native solution, unifying multiple features like DNS-layer security, threat intelli...
What do you like most about Microsoft Cloud App Security?
It does a great job of monitoring and maintaining a security baseline. For us, that is a key element. The notifications are pretty good.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Cloud App Security?
Where we are right now, this is an acceptable pricing. I would like to see more transparency given to the end user. The end user given to us is via the cloud service provider. There are different p...
 

Also Known As

No data available
MS Cloud App Security, Microsoft Cloud App Security
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Customers for Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps include Accenture, St. Luke’s University Health Network, Ansell, and Nakilat.
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Bastion vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.