Azure Site Recovery vs VMware SRM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st)
VMware SRM
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
73
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (6th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the market share of Azure Site Recovery is 5.7% and it increased by 3.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of VMware SRM is 12.7% and it increased by 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
Unique Categories:
Disaster Recovery as a Service
23.8%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Mike Douthitt - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 26, 2024
Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time
Speaking about how Azure Site Recovery has facilitated the migration of on-premises workloads to the Azure Cloud, I would say that my company is still in the testing phase, and we also use Veeam. My company is trying to find the best spot for recovery, disaster recovery, and migrations. Veeam plays a big part in what my company does in terms of backup and recovery, so we are just trying to figure out how a Microsoft tool will fit into our environment. I haven't faced any challenges using the product. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.
Siva Kuppala - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 30, 2024
Offers simplified management and automated recovery process, which reduces the need for manual intervention during a disaster
Automated recovery is one good feature, SRM also offers simplified management. It has a centralized interface for configuring, testing, and executing disaster recovery plans across multiple sites. This means management from a single point, even for many sites. Recovery plans can be different for customers. So, another important feature is the policy-based protection within SRM. Recovery plans can be customized based on business requirements, including Recovery Point Objectives (RPO) and Recovery Time Objectives (RTO). These objectives might differ between industries – healthcare might need a more aggressive RPO, for instance. Additionally, SRM offers failback capabilities and reporting features for compliance.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is very easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"We use the tool for business continuity purposes."
"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."
"What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."
"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."
"VMware SRM is very effective between two sites with identical twin storage, you can have synchronization between the two sites."
"The solution is strong when it comes to protection and analytics, with the latter being added later on."
"The UI is very user-friendly and testing is easy."
"We find the back up feature of this solution to be particularly valuable."
"SRM's best feature is automation."
"The simplicity of VMware SRM is one of its most important features. SRM console is straightforward to manage. It offers simplicity in monitoring, managing, and deploying, making it a unique value proposition. Additionally, Nutanix solutions also provide a simple GUI, which helps in operational efficiency."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the automatic recovery of the virtual machine if it goes down."
"Virtual Machine Recovery during DR situation, with automation and easy to use menus and options."
 

Cons

"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"I would like to see more security features."
"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"The solution needs to improve replication and failover processes. We are still looking for improvements in the cost baseline."
"Could have more integration with other platforms."
"The immutable backup could be better."
"It would be good if this solution could integrate configuration management software such as Chef Infra."
"SRM has to be installed on two separate data centers, so both have to be coordinated very well, which becomes complicated when configuring the software for disaster recovery."
"In my view, if VMware comes up with an appliance-based solution like vCenter Server (which was also Windows-based), it will be much easier for deployment. I"
"VMware SRM's platform agnostics should support on-cloud usage as well."
"One thing which is lacking from the SRM is reporting."
"In my opinion, the integration with Peer Persistent Storage could be improved."
"Technical support can take some time to respond."
"The product's dashboard is an area of concern where improvements are required."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."
"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."
"They have a license to pay."
"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."
"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."
"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."
"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."
"Compare to hardware-based replication, I think software based replication is best and cheap."
"It is an expensive platform. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."
"The price of VMware SRM depends on how many VMs the customer has to move. There is a difference between the standard and enterprise license. I'm presenting the standard license to my customers because the total of VMs is not more than 50. The customer needs only the standard license and the cost is very effective for him."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee for VMware SRM, which is not very expensive."
"VMware SRM is an expensive solution, and users need to pay extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"Licensing costs explode after 75 VMs."
"It is about $3,000 a year for the 25 pack. The package gives you the ability to protect up to 25 virtual machines."
"I rate the solution's pricing a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user159711 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 9, 2014
VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto
Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Site Recovery?
Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?
The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricin...
What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?
The solution needs to improve replication and failover processes. We are still looking for improvements in the cost baseline.
What do you like most about VMware SRM?
The most valuable feature of the solution is the integration part, along with the subsequent hardware.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware SRM?
VMware SRM is an expensive solution, and users need to pay extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
What needs improvement with VMware SRM?
It would be better if we could get more reporting features in VMware SRM.
 

Also Known As

No data available
VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
Acorda Therapeutics, Columbia Sportswear, Mainfreight, Nippon Express, Sin Chew Media, Fisher & Paykel, Siam City Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware SRM and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.