Balbix BreachControl vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Balbix BreachControl
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
47th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (11th)
Microsoft Defender Vulnerab...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
22nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (26th), Microsoft Security Suite (27th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the market share of Balbix BreachControl is 0.1% and it decreased by 88.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is 3.8% and it decreased by 22.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories:
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
2.8%
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
0.4%
Microsoft Security Suite
0.2%
 

Featured Reviews

Use Balbix BreachControl?
Share your opinion
René-SylvainBédard - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 19, 2024
The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database
I have three years of experience with Microsoft Defender and Office 365 for eleven years. My company operates as a shop for Microsoft products, and we have always stayed with Microsoft. We intend to displace the competition when my company enters a new client environment. I have dealt with customers who were using Carbon Black and SentinelOne. My company's customers switched work from their previous products to Microsoft because the tools they were using were power-hungry solutions, which had an impact on production. Microsoft Office 365's premium licenses have many built-in services, which our customers used to use from some other products. With Microsoft products, there is no need for our company's customers to pay extra for licensing charges. The major difference between Carbon Black and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management revolves around areas like stability and integration capabilities within the operating systems, which are strong in Microsoft, especially compared to any of its competitors. The actual depth of knowledge that the platform offers is good because Microsoft has been very rigorous in documenting every single vulnerability that exists for its platform. Microsoft has the most complete list of vulnerabilities for its platform.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I rate the product's price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."
"The product’s pricing is medium."
"The licensing model follows a per-user per-month structure."
"The tool is a bit costly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
17%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

BreachControl
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cavium
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.