Bizagi vs Nomis Solutions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (5th), Process Automation (6th), Rapid Application Development Software (13th), Low-Code Development Platforms (10th), No-Code Development Platforms (5th), Process Mining (4th)
Nomis Solutions
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
65th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Julian Torres - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 26, 2022
Fast development, easy integrations, and good scalability
We have migrated to the cloud, but there are a lot of issues while integrating with the cloud. There are a lot of things to improve with the cloud and reporting. We were previously working with on-premise solutions, and we had access to a lot of things, but with the cloud, they changed a lot of functionalities. Some of the things we know, but with some of the things, we are having difficulties. They have been working with apps. They have been launching new apps and widgets, but there are a lot of bugs in new functionalities, new widgets, and even new versions. That's an area where they need to improve.
Use Nomis Solutions?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."
"Some solutions are completely free. One would be the business process diagramming tool, the server beneath it, and the automation tool. You don't need to pay to map the business process, but you would need to when you want to execute any of the commands. So, basically, they lure you in with a free ride, and when you want to scale the solution, you'll have to pay for it."
"We didn't use the licensed versions where you could exactly go into automatization. However, we looked at the pricing in the beginning, and the only thing that I remember is that it was too expensive for the things we were using because our clients would also have to license the product. One client said that it was too expensive for the benefit they get out of it."
"We use the free version of the solution because the price is in dollars, making it expensive for where we are in Brazil."
"It has a very high price. Many clients complain about the price for maintaining the application on Bizagi."
"The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."
"The product must improve its cost."
"I'm trying the free unlimited version with unlimited use. But you have to pay to add some features."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Educational Organization
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?
I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...
What do you like most about Bizagi?
The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.
Nationwide, Bank of Ireland, Scotia Bank, NED Bank, RBC, Tangerine Bank, Huntington Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.