We performed a comparison between Camunda and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Camunda is a scalable product."
"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."
"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."
"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"Valuable features include workflows (escalation, reminder, LazyApproval, actions, etc.) and ease of use."
"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"It can scale well."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."
"The business model could be easier to understand."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Visio, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM, Bizagi and AgilePoint. See our Camunda vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
