Check Point Security Management vs IBM Security QRadar comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 23, 2023
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...
Ranking in Log Management
10th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (15th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (3rd)
IBM Security QRadar
Ranking in Log Management
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
198
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (4th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (20th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (4th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (11th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Log Management category, the market share of Check Point Security Management is 1.0% and it decreased by 20.5% compared to the previous year. The market share of IBM Security QRadar is 8.2% and it increased by 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
Unique Categories:
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
0.4%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
16.3%
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
13.5%
 

Featured Reviews

LucianoMiguel - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 26, 2023
A highly accessible and fast tool that provides a very good technical support
I use it for managing ten clusters in our on-premise environment. With this kind of management, it's possible to question its policy and change many configurations in the files. With its management, we got all the logs from the environment. With Check Point Security Management, we get the benefits…
Ertugrul Akbas - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 29, 2022
Scalable, easy to use, but lacking features and modern user interface
IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics could improve machine learning use cases because they are limited and most of the use cases are rule-based. They should develop more use cases, such as in Securonix or Exabeam because they will detect a threat. Using machine learning is mainly on the correlation rules, but if you think about Exabeam or Securonix, they detect using machine learning or machine learning-based algorithms. Using the interface of IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is the same for years, they should redesign the interface to make it more modern. Some historical queries take a long time, they should improve or change their database. There are some missing operators on the correlation side. For example, some before operated.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Check Point has been very effective in terms of threat management and comprehensive protection against vulnerabilities, and it has given us confidence that our data is not going anywhere."
"The most valuable feature for me is Identity Awareness."
"The firewall cleverly handles such attacks without compromising on performance."
"The cluster solution made our job easier any fault to the device will not halt entire internet connectivity."
"It's a great solution for management. We can manage a lot at the same time with one security management system. Also, each gateway depends on the other, which is helpful."
"Having the possibility to use Smart Event to check for threats on a broader scale helps after a security incident and also makes it easier to check - instead of looking through different logs."
"Mobile access has helped us cater to more than 4000 users so that they can work from home."
"HA Structure provides good coverage and works fine."
"IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics's most important feature is its ease of use."
"The most valuable features are all the implementations, the plug-ins, and the User Behavior Analytics (UBA)."
"The solution is quite flexible."
"The flexibility is good in terms of pulling log files."
"I have found IBM QRadar to be scalable."
"I think the QDI is very good."
"Technical support is good overall."
"IBM Security QRadar has significantly improved our incident response procedures."
 

Cons

"I would like to bind users to their network, as well as their local office machine."
"In the future, I would like the platform to be able to integrate or manage appliances or third-party equipment."
"Check Point could possibly lighten up the software code so that it is not as resource-intensive and will run more smoothly on a variety of hardware and cloud or virtual machine platforms."
"SD-WAN functionality could be added."
"Some costs are ridiculously high."
"We would like to improve the upgrade process in order to do mass upgrades to firewalls and to be able to upgrade target firewalls at the same time."
"Check Point could improve by enhancing the networking in their solution in order to align it with the existing network architecture."
"It also offers compatibility with third-party security solutions, however, it is not a lot. This needs to be improved."
"I think that the search speed of this solution could be improved."
"The solution could improve by having more out-of-the-box use cases."
"The dashboard is pathetic and it takes a long time to perform a search."
"A lot of information that we receive for the devices is IP-based, but it would help if we could have a default dashboard in which we can add more details about the assets for which we are receiving the information. For example, if it is a Windows or Linux device, we only get the IP for that particular device. We don't really get the name and other details of that particular device. For that, you have to drill down into your own asset management system. It would be good to have a place where we can probably add this information so that we don't have to look into other tools."
"They should provide more manual examples online so that I can learn it myself."
"The interface is very old. IBM should remake it into a more modern interface."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the script which we have to create for custom actions. QRadar needs to improve that feature. Additionally, QRadar has to provide the playbooks designing features."
"Some of the cloud apps need improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing can be estimated around 3 or 4 out of 10 in terms of expense."
"Check Point is much cheaper than the competition ($4/server as compared to $17/server)."
"The solution is expensive and there is an annual license."
"This product can be used for 25 security gateways on a basic license."
"Price-wise, it is an expensive solution."
"Do the homework because Check Point is rather expensive."
"The solution is priced fairly, there is a license for the solution, and we pay annually."
"There is a license to use this solution, which is paid annually. However, there are subscription options available."
"On a scale of one to ten, I rate the price a one, where one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is a cheap product."
"I feel that the price is reasonable but compared to other products that are on the market, such as an offering by Microsoft, it is more expensive."
"IBM QRadar is a little bit expensive compared to other products."
"I think that the price is fair, but we can always say that the price could be cheaper."
"It's free of charge."
"found other solutions, with more features at the same cost or less. You don’t have to leave the Gartner Magic Quadrant to beat their price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Jun 28, 2015
Qradar vs. ArcSight
Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Security Firm
13%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
19%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Security Management?
The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as...
What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?
Check Point EDR has room for improvement, especially in the area of Data Loss Prevention where it currently lacks functionality. I'd also like to see enhancements in content filtering and categoriz...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?
We utilize Check Point Security Management for our daily security operations, including managing firewall rules, reviewing alerts, and generating reports on a weekly basis.
What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
What do you like most about IBM QRadar?
The event collector, flow collector, PCAP and SOAR are valuable.
 

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar, IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger
Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. IBM Security QRadar and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.