Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Huawei Wireless comparison

Cisco and Huawei are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while Huawei is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6. Cisco holds a 10.3% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Huawei’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Huawei users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Read 122 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

10,406 Views
9,261 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Huawei Wireless

Read 36 Huawei Wireless reviews

4,539 Views
4,448 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Huawei Wireless

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Huawei Wireless are significant contenders in the wireless network management category. Cisco Meraki seems to have the edge with its advanced features and robust support, while Huawei offers a cost-effective solution attracting budget-conscious buyers.

Features: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers centralized cloud management, ease of configuration, and robust security features. Its dashboard simplifies management of multiple devices and locations with extensive monitoring and reporting. Huawei Wireless provides competitive speeds and excellent value-for-money access points with strong WiFi 6 integration, offering good coverage and stability.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki users note the need for comprehensive error logging and advanced configuration options, and quicker technical support responses are desired. Huawei Wireless encounters challenges in network design, speed of support, and advanced security features. Enhancements in cloud management integration and technical support could improve its presence.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki provides flexible deployment across cloud and on-premises, with highly regarded technical support. It excels in providing comprehensive support and documentation. Huawei Wireless is praised for its on-premises deployment and decent customer service, though support could benefit from streamlined resolution processes.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki's high cost is justified by robust features, with a subscription-based model that aligns ROI with operational efficiency. Huawei Wireless is significantly cheaper and uses a one-time purchase model, making it attractive to budget-conscious buyers. Both solutions offer positive ROI but cater to distinct market segments based on budget and feature needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,821 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

122

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Huawei Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 10.3%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huawei Wireless is 5.6%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN	10.3%
Huawei Wireless	5.6%
Other	84.1%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

DolfKrikke

Senior Network Architect at Previder

Centralized management has simplified remote branch control and improved network visibility

Cisco Meraki Wireless is very powerful and very easy to manage. The solution is also integrating Cisco Catalyst Wireless products into their portfolio, and they are managing the Catalyst switches as well. The seamless roaming capabilities function well. I monitor network performance with Meraki's real-time analytics. The most useful metrics to my team are the internet performance metrics, as there is a lot of information in the dashboard that I can access. All auditing and event logs are centralized in the dashboard. When I need to apply to compliance requirements or other regulatory needs, I can have my auditing in one place, which is an advantage. I use Cisco Meraki Wireless's Layer 7 application traffic shaping with the MX and the Meraki MX Firewalls.

Read full review

Fahad Doguwa

Deputy Manager at Central Bank of Nigeria

Affordable platform with efficient analytics features

Huawei adapters have facilitated seamless integration with mobile devices, extending the LAN's reach. Additionally, including CampusInsight, a component offering analytics and visibility into wireless connectivity, has proven invaluable. This feature enables us to monitor network health and troubleshoot user-related issues efficiently. The reliability has had a positive impact on our operations. I advise others to go for Cisco if cost is not a factor. Otherwise, they can explore other options based on the availability of that OEM within the country. We have Huawei present in our country and provide all the necessary support, so we went forward with them. I rate it a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I liked about these is that they worked. I didn't touch them or do anything with them. They were up and running when I came here. Once they are set up and running, you don't have to worry about them."

"Configuring network policies remotely for Cisco Meraki Wireless is very useful for an organization that has many branches, as I can manage it centrally from the Meraki dashboard without having to drive to a location, even if it is 100 or more kilometers away."

"The product offers HA solutions and redundancy features to ensure reliable operations."

"Multiple access ID capabilities, meshing, and the quality of the product itself are all valuable features."

"It is cloud-based. It has a GUI rather than a command line, and it just works."

"We rarely encounter any issues. The solutions have been very stable."

"Its ability to be cloud-managed is the most valuable feature so if there's a reconfiguration or an issue, we have excellent visibility into the network and we can usually resolve the problem online without having to go onsite."

"Cisco Meraki is HIPAA compliant."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros

"The solution's roaming feature is very nice. When you move to another place it automatically changes the access point. It's one of the most valuable features."

"I think it's a good technology. I like that it transparently connects with LDAP. The technology has a lot of capacity for WiFi six. It provides notifications, and there are many ways to connect with fiber. There is an electrical tool, and you can put an SFP transceiver. There are also many ways to implement antennas."

"I am impressed with the tool's seamless integration."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The solution offers very good value for money."

"It is easy to set up."

"The product's Wi-Fi 7 solution stands out as it offers cutting-edge technology in wireless communication, enhancing bandwidth management and coverage."

"It is based on 802.11ax, which is a new technology. There are several valuable things, such as its speed and mobility. There are options for self-organizing networking so that it can perform operations and maintain itself. Its three interfaces are very good and user friendly."

More Huawei Wireless pros

Cons

"The ease of use is average. It could be more user-friendly."

"Licensing is, in my opinion, the least appealing component. It can be difficult to keep licenses up to date in order for the system to function properly."

"The product's coverage area could be expanded. It would help ensure better connectivity."

"The throughput of the switches for wireless could be improved."

"The error logs need to be much more comprehensive."

"An area for improvement would be that Meraki doesn't work well in a warehouse environment. The device is too sensitive to other wireless devices, which provokes noise and can require a reboot to erase this."

"The customization needs to be improved because it's pretty locked down."

"It would be useful to have a service management platform integrated within this solution where we can measure the customer experience."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons

"The ongoing support and ongoing follow-up on customers is an area where the solution lacks."

"While technically proficient, enhancing communication skills would greatly benefit the customer experience."

"Cloud integration needs to be improved."

"Technical support could be better."

"Huawei Wireless has a small technical problem. When you use a power injector, it needs to be specially configured for the switch to which it is connected. It tries to take power not from the power injector but from the switch. The funny thing when you look at it is that you have three switches or maybe four or five that are theoretically capable. However, the port on these switches is disabled. When you connect the access point to a power injector, the access point checks for features from the switch, but on this port, the switch doesn't do power. So, the access point changes these features to energy save mode and cuts off some features, especially WiFi 6. It took me two weeks to find out what's going on and how to mitigate this sort of problem. It is very easy to fix. You need to disable LLDP on the port on which you connect the access point to the power injector. Power injectors aren't quite commonly used, but I have 54 access points, and I have used about 27 power injectors. So, about half of the access points were working at reduced speed, not full speed, for two weeks."

"The solution's integration with some AAA servers like Aruba ClearPass is difficult and could be improved."

"Improving the visibility, control offered, and cloud management would all be very helpful. Also how you can monetize the information you get from Wi-Fi controllers should be improved."

"While I am fine with the current licensing price, I would appreciate it to be more cost-effective."

More Huawei Wireless cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is overpriced and more expensive than Hauwei."

"Since it's been acquired by Cisco, it's an even higher cost."

"The solution is pretty expensive."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

"These units cost between $800 and $900 per device and on top of that, you have to pay yearly fees for maintenance."

"The price of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is per unit and it has annual maintenance costs."

"The cost is not so much for Wireless LAN, but when you have to get the security license, it costs a lot."

"This solution is quite costly and there are costs in addition to the licensing fees."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"The product has a good price."

"Huawei licenses can be for either a one-year up to a five-year period and also apply for the tiers."

"The price is good for the solution and there is a license required."

"I rate Huawei Wireless' pricing a five out of ten."

"Huawei Wireless is an expensive solution."

"To compete effectively, Huawei might consider adjusting pricing to align more closely with other competitive brands, particularly those offering lower-cost solutions."

"The price of Huawei Wireless is very good."

"Huawei Wireless is an expensive product. I'm rating it as one out of ten, price-wise."

More Huawei Wireless pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

Which wireless solution would you choose - Huawei or D-Link?

Huawei wireless is a strong and solid product that has a lot of features - and for all that it offers, it happens to be very cost effective. As a wireless solution, it is simple and its user interf...

See all answers

What do you like most about Huawei Wireless?

The reliability has had a positive impact on our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huawei Wireless?

For SMB customers with limited wireless users, Huawei Wireless may not be suitable due to the lack of multiple access points and the need for a centralized SSID. However, for large-capacity custome...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 34% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 11% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 5% of the time

Omada Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors

Aruba Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 12% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 12% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 11% of the time

Omada Access Points vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 5% of the time

More Huawei Wireless Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

February 2026

Download Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Huawei Wireless

January 2026

Download Huawei Wireless product report

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN

Huawei WLAN

Overview

Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.

Cisco

Huawei WLAN products are compatible with 802.11a/b/g/n/ac standards to establish high-speed, secure, and reliable wireless network connections for indoor and outdoor applications.WLAN products can be used in enterprise offices, schools, hospitals, large shopping malls, exhibition centers, airports, and more.

Huawei

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Anhui Agricultural University (AAU), China Everbright Bank

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless

February 2026

Free Report: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.