Cisco Nexus vs HPE ProCurve comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Nexus
Ranking in LAN Switching
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
101
Ranking in other categories
Data Center Networking (3rd)
HPE ProCurve
Ranking in LAN Switching
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the LAN Switching category, the market share of Cisco Nexus is 10.2% and it decreased by 2.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of HPE ProCurve is 11.9% and it decreased by 20.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
LAN Switching
Unique Categories:
Data Center Networking
23.2%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Joe Benítez - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2023
Offer high performance capabilities and enables efficient data transmission and processing
Before Nexus, I used to have Catalyst 6500 switches. Those 6500 series chassis gave us a lot of problems. Too many problems, actually. And we had a Cisco ASA firewall blade within those chassis. And they were running outdated software. So, in fact, it was the firewall blade that caused us too many problems instead of the chassis. The chassis itself was working well and performing fine, but the firewall card was not suitable for our needs. That was one aspect. Additionally, those chassis had been in operation for more than five years. As we are a local government, we have a policy to renew hardware every five years. That's because we need to maintain all the hardware and software in the latest versions and keep up with the technology lifecycle of the technology we use.
Pradeep Visvanathan - PeerSpot reviewer
May 19, 2023
Reliable, easy to implement, and helpful support
HPE ProCurve is used for enterprise The most valuable feature of HPE ProCurve is its ease of use and implementation. The pricing model could be improved in HPE ProCurve. I have been using HPE ProCurve for approximately 10 years. HPE ProCurve is stable. The solution could improve the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the Bluetooth console."
"A very solid and reliable solution."
"We are a Cisco shop. This solution is better compared to other options."
"The integrations are valuable."
"Cisco is refining the features all the time and you can see this in all the different vendors."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Nexus is speed compared to what you would get from a Catalyst Series switch."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"When it comes to data centers, Cisco Nexus is the best."
"It has an excellent menu system where you can use both the CLI and a menu system and the GUI version. They have three options for manipulating, updating, and changing the switch, which we like."
"The web page interface is very convenient and easy to use for setting up your feedback loops."
"Its easy manageability is most valuable. It's easy to manage."
"ProCurve is easy to configure and to know how to create each connection and configuration."
"One of the biggest things in HPE ProCurve that I like, though not necessarily a feature, is the HPE warranty because it's probably better than any of the other vendors that we deal with, as it has a lifetime replacement. Feature-wise, the web interface of HPE ProCurve is typically pretty good and I like that as well."
"HPE ProCurve has plenty of features."
"HPE ProCurve is used to connect servers and storage in the data center."
"We have found the solution to be entirely stable."
 

Cons

"Cisco Nexus is just a platform. You just set it up, give it an IP, and then start configuring it. But there are a million features to configure."
"Multi contexts would be nice to have to separate different tenants logically and securely."
"There is no feature parity between the 9K and the 5K or 7K, which means that it is harder to position the 9K to future proof them."
"I would like to see some development into the SAE world where you can virtualize. That would be the only thing I would like to see because I need to start virtualizing my infrastructure gear at some of the other data centers that I have."
"I would like to see a lighter platform."
"There is an ongoing problem with the limitation of the TCAM table, which is that it doesn't have enough memory to allow you to be really granular with your policy."
"It would be nice if the solution offered multiple types of port support."
"I feel that this solution should be more flexible and scalable."
"The only things that might need improvement would be the administrative tools and the graphical interface. The GUI could be improved on the administrative interface, for example."
"There should be faster interfaces on the switch, such as 25 gigabits."
"There is one proprietary function they lack, and I can't remember what it was called, but it monitors the ports, and then every 10 seconds if the port is down, it can divert the traffic somewhere else."
"The product could be cheaper."
"HPE ProCurve's web interface is old, and I have to log in on each device separately, making them the product's shortcomings that need improvement."
"The solution should offer different gigabit interfaces. Right now, they have ten gigabits. However, for our needs, we only need one gigabit. We don't need 24 or 48 ports. We only need eight to ten. HPE should introduce into their portfolio some smaller and more compact options."
"The product must provide something similar to Cisco’s command-line interface."
"The pricing model could be improved in HPE ProCurve."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing costs for this solution are approximately $200 USD per month."
"The solution is expensive."
"The price of the product is reasonable."
"We have a three-year subscription for our licensing fees."
"This is a very expensive product."
"The license for Cisco Nexus is one year to three years, in this case for the SMARTnet. It is a price per unit, in terms of this specific appliance."
"Cisco Nexus is not a cheaply priced product."
"The subscription model and price could be better."
"The price of this product is cheap."
"There is no need to pay for the solution's license."
"This is an expensive switch."
"The price of HPE ProCurve is very good."
"You buy the switch and that's it."
"HPE ProCurve price could improve. We have a three-year warranty."
"It provides quite good value for money."
"There is a license required to use HPE ProCurve."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
25%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Educational Organization
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Nexus?
The product's initial setup phase is very easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Nexus?
Cisco Nexus is not a cheaply priced product. The tool offers a perpetual-based licensing model and subscription-based licensing model. For Cisco's hardware and RMA process, you need to opt for a su...
What needs improvement with Cisco Nexus?
The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required. Cisco Nexus should lower its current prices.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE ProCurve?
Compared to other competitors, the pricing is very good. I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with one being very cheap and ten being very expensive.
What needs improvement with HPE ProCurve?
The user interface (UI) could be better. Sometimes navigating through the switch interface to find specific features wasn't very intuitive. As an administrator, the layout could make it difficult t...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProCurve, HP ProCurve
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Cardinal Newman Catholic Secondary School, DY 4 Systems, EdgeWing, Edmonton Public Schools District, Halton Catholic District School Board, Hartwick College, Hatch Associates, Huntingdon College, Roseville Joint Union High School District, Saddleback Valley Unified School District, One Superior Place
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.