Cisco TelePresence vs Dimension Data Conferencing Services [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco TelePresence
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (7th)
Dimension Data Conferencing...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Virtual Meetings category, the market share of Cisco TelePresence is 5.6% and it increased by 22.6% compared to the previous year. The market share of Dimension Data Conferencing Services [EOL] is 0.6% and it increased by 295.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

MN
Feb 2, 2024
Reliable and stable for large-scale virtual events or conferences, handling over 50 endpoints but lack certain collaboration features, such as the ability for participants to join from other software
TelePresence is similar to a computing server but more complex. For example, endpoints or devices (components) need to be registered first on the VCS (virtual control server) or call manager. It uses licenses first of all. Then there's another appliance called TB Conductor, which handles routing…
Use Dimension Data Conferencing Services [EOL]?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."
"The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."
"I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The price of Cisco Telepresence is high, especially in Brazil. However, the quality of the product justifies the cost."
"We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
11%
University
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco TelePresence?
It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
What needs improvement with Cisco TelePresence?
There can be some features to enhance the collaboration. For example, with 50 participants using physical devices, some might want to join from other software like Teams, Link, or Skype. That wasn'...
What advice do you have for others considering Cisco TelePresence?
Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

TelePresence
VirtuaLive Telepresence, Teliris VirtuaLive Telepresence
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images
Connected Conservation Kenya, City Of Las Vegas
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.