CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM vs SonarQube comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM
Ranking in Application Security Tools
39th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (6th)
SonarQube
Ranking in Application Security Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
112
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the market share of CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM is 0.3% and it increased by 252.4% compared to the previous year. The market share of SonarQube is 27.7% and it decreased by 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
Unique Categories:
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
31.6%
Software Development Analytics
47.2%
 

Featured Reviews

Use CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?
Share your opinion
Wang Dayong - PeerSpot reviewer
May 10, 2023
Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages
We use the product to review our software codes. We have integrated the product to review our new delivery code When we deliver a code, the solution scans the code and reports whether the code has bugs or any other vulnerability issues. Thus the solution helps us identify issues and improve the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of this solution is more expensive than competitors. However, it works better than competitors."
"The licence is standard open source licensing"
"The tool's pricing is reasonable."
"We're using their free Community Edition version."
"SonarQube is a fairly affordable solution for a larger scale if you have a specific role or specific department for secure code."
"We use the free version; there are no hidden costs or licensing required."
"SonarQube enterprise, I am not sure of the price but from what I understand they are charging a fee. It's is not clear if it is an annual fee or a one-off."
"The solution has a free version and a license version. The license is priced reasonably, the cost of hiring one programmer is more expensive than the solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
Insurance Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...
Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...
How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Bionic ASPM
Sonar
 

Learn More

 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.