CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Privileged Access Management (PAM) (6th)
Ivanti Endpoint Security fo...
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (46th), Endpoint Compliance (6th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (9th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the market share of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 4.5% and it decreased by 9.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is 0.2% and it decreased by 20.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
0.8%
Endpoint Compliance
3.2%
 

Featured Reviews

IkeEkweruo - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 21, 2022
Helps us secure our endpoints and prevent attacks, but it can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies.
All of the features are valuable. They control applications for users, like preventing users from elevating applications. You can use it to strip users of their local admin rights and, at the same time, elevate applications for them and give them access to elevated applications. Hence, administrative rights are unavailable for domain accounts which are the juicy ones for attackers because they can use them to move laterally from one host to another. Therefore, attackers can no longer strip a user's near right, but at the same time, they can elevate the user from access to the application and do their jobs without having issues elevating applications.
Timothy Brian Chiacchira - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 17, 2023
Scalable platform with efficient security patching features
The product has different tool sets for different use cases. It provides security features for unified endpoint management. It has features for automated patching. It has a 96 to 97% success rate for patching our servers and workstations The platform helped us build firewalls and patches when a…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is very easy to manage, which I like. The solution also has a dashboard where you can see which software is suspicious, which I find valuable."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The product is very flexible"
"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."
"The feature called PTA, which stands for Privileged Threat Analytics keeps track of what admins are doing and works with Centimeters. If something fishy is going on with a user's credentials, it alerts the security team so they can act fast. Plus, it automates stuff like resetting credentials or blocking users. So, if there's a potential hack, CyberArk can change passwords and lock out users in a snap. It also gives you a heads-up if anything unusual is going on with server activities, like someone creating new users with uncontrolled credentials."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."
"I like that you can remove the admin rights from the user's computer and have control over the environment. That means you can delete the local admins and grant them proper privileges with the console. So, they will get proper permissions for applications they need, but we don't have to do it. In the domain where we don't have control, the user can only do specified actions, but not all of them."
"The solution's most valuable features are its patch management functionality and provisioning."
"It provides security features for unified endpoint management."
"The best part about Ivanti and Matrix 42 is that they are low-code solution builders with drag-and-drop capabilities regarding service management."
"The key differentiator is that it manages mobile devices and laptops in the same console. Windows and Linux are on the same console. This is the only product that does this. It's really the best in the industry."
"The most valuable features of the solution are accessing the data through the mobiles and meeting with the compliance for security best practices."
"The most valuable feature of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager, which my company mainly uses, is patching. Another valuable feature of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is that it allows you to view the inventory list of the different machines."
"Patching and remediation are the strongest features."
 

Cons

"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"The price of the solution should improve."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The tool should be more user-friendly."
"One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."
"CyberArk has some performance issues. For example, servers could not handle the solution when we first took CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager."
"When you open a new mobile, you automatically come onboard the mobile on the Ivanti platform but it needs some improvements."
"An area for improvement in Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is reporting. It's lacking. For example, Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager reports should tell you if the agent is up to date, if the security patch is updated, etc."
"Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager's support provided to its users by the vendor is one area that needs to improve."
"The product's blocking definition needs improvement."
"If I want to integrate the solution with any other solution, pushing the policies from the Ivanti side is a bit tough."
"The solution needs a complete overhaul or makeover. It gets stuck sometimes because they're focusing on the cloud UEM stuff rather than paying as much attention to that particular piece. The ease of use could be improved. It combines many different functionalities that you would need multiple servers like SCCM. If I wanted to train people, I’d move to a higher level from an Apache architect. There are five or six different products. So, training functional staff to use the product can be challenging because it can sometimes be cumbersome. Reporting is challenging. We use Avanti extraction to report off an endpoint. We don't use the reporting because of the need for more functionality, granularity, or customization."
"One of the features that Ivanti could improve is patching for non-Windows settings, such as Linux and Ubuntu."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I feel that the price of the product is nominal. It must be around 10 to 15 USD per installation. I rate the product price an eight to nine out of ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."
"The tool is priced high. I would rate its pricing an eight out of ten."
"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."
"We pay about $17 per user."
"The solution requires an annual license to use it. There can be some extra costs in some cases."
"It's not at the lower end of the market. I think the price is reasonable considering the quality it delivers. It is a top-notch solution at a fair price point."
"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."
"The cost for CyberArk is very high."
"Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is more expensive than some of the products I've used. It follows module-based licensing, so it would be more costly if you had more modules. Your costs depend on what modules you need."
"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest, and one is the cheapest, I rate its pricing a five."
"The product is expensive."
"The solution is pretty expensive."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing ten out of ten."
"The licensing is based on assets for MDM or EM, where you need one license per asset. The license is annual, and it is not very expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
What do you like most about Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?
The most valuable features of the solution are accessing the data through the mobiles and meeting with the compliance for security best practices.
What needs improvement with Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?
The solution is a bit complex. If I want to integrate the solution with any other solution, pushing the policies from the Ivanti side is a bit tough. Since accessing the device through Ivanti has a...
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?
Our clients use the solution to manage or provide workers or employees access to the entity's data. The solution is very helpful for Mac and Android devices regarding compliance, data breaches, or ...
 

Also Known As

Viewfinity
LANDesk Security Suite, Ivanti Endpoint Security
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Otkritie Bank, France T_l_visions, MBDA, 21st Century Oncology, Sealed Air Corporation, Granite School District, The Bunker, The MAC Services Group, Adams 12 Five Star Schools District, AlliedBarton Security Services, Mohawk Industries, Sun National Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.