We performed a comparison between CylancePROTECT and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"It does a good job of protecting us."
"The most functional item that we use is the process to turn off the false flags that it causes."
"The solution is very quick at easily changing the levels of protection for each computer and the server."
"The Application Guard and ByteGuard are useful features."
"A user can continue to add endpoints and the solution will continue to perform well."
"I find the actual overall endpoint malware protection the most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT."
"Even if an endpoint loses connection to the Internet, I know that endpoint is protected against 99.99% of the threats in the wild today."
"On the management side, we liked the way it displays things."
"The central management console is powerful. You can manage endpoints, DLP, encryption, and all the other features from a single console."
"The performance is good."
"Their malware detection rate is excellent for all type of devices and the anti-theft products are good and easy to use."
"McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection is stable. We don't have any bugs being reported."
"I feel McAfee Endpoint Security to be a good, mature product."
"Threat prevention is valuable because most clients use other solutions like antivirus as part of web protection. I don't find that kind of solution useful."
"This product has the capability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices."
"The product helps us by contacting us if there are any virus attacks on our system."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"Detections could be improved."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"The stability could be improved."
"The user interface is outdated."
"CylancePROTECT could be improved in its technical support and communication."
"Reporting is an area with shortcomings in CylancePROTECT that needs to be improved."
"Work on the math model. We are catching a lot of false positives, which gets to be a pain at the start of a deployment."
"The solution’s user interface could be improved."
"I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices."
"It's a good solution but some features just need to be updated."
"McAfee Endpoint Protection could improve the word control feature."
"The resolution time should be faster."
"An area of improvement for this solution is to make it easier to manage."
"We have a lot of problems with the user experience and it's difficult to implement. MacAfee's better than the ancient anti-virus solutions but it's a little slow to resolve. Many files with malware were destroyed through the network, and MacAfee doesn't detect anything."
"I would like this solution to do what Palo Alto traps does because I would only need to run this one product."
"Currently, Trellix Endpoint Security can't find the running mutexes, while other open-source products can do it."
"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."
"While we are pleased with the endpoint solution, there should also be a separate one for the firewall."
CylancePROTECT is ranked 23rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 41 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Symantec Endpoint Security, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our CylancePROTECT vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.