Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint Data Loss Preven...
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GTB Technologies Inspector
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
16th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the market share of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is 19.7% and it increased by 6.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of GTB Technologies Inspector is 2.3% and it decreased by 27.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Edwin Eze-Osiago - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 16, 2023
Integrates well with third-party products and flexible
I would like to see the product extended into the cloud as a single solution. It currently requires another product, the Cloud Access Security Brokers, to protect both on-premise and cloud data. I hope it can be consolidated into a single suite, offering protection for both On-Premise and cloud data, users on and off the corporate network, and users using corporate devices and BYOD. It would make the whole DLP process much more linear and efficient. I agree that moving to the cloud is the future and the present, and many people who use DLP have already made a move to the cloud.
Shruti Shetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 19, 2023
An affordable and scalable product that has a good dashboard and a centralized console for everything
The product has an endpoint OCR, which other DLPs don't provide The product has a centralized console for everything. The centralized console is really good. The product’s dashboard is really good for creating customized reports. The solution’s performance must be improved. Endpoint OCR affects…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Has multiple modules and is good with integration."
"The initial setup process went well."
"We receive a lot of insights from this product."
"It's fast and it prepares loss reports."
"The ease of configuration was probably one of its biggest selling points."
"A very user-friendly predefining feature."
"The fingerprinting technology is the solution's most valuable feature. It's unique to Forcepoint."
"The Forcepoint tool is well developed. It is ranked in many evaluations at the top when it comes to enterprise DLP solutions. It has good artificial intelligence that enables our customers to focus on specific incidents, instead of having a complicated list of uncategorized incidents."
"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."
"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."
"This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."
"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."
"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."
"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."
"The product has a centralized console for everything."
 

Cons

"The solution's interface is still not user-friendly for some customers. So, its interface can be better."
"There is no support for the Bangla (Bengali) language, so we cannot use the Forcepoint technology for Bangla documents."
"They can improve a bit in the OCR category. The OCR deployment could be simplified. Right now, you have to set up a separate server to manage all the data going through the network, especially the images. Forcepoint could better integrate the OCR component with central management."
"When you automatically try to upgrade the agent it causes problems."
"If you are a macOS user, there are issues in the area of USB control."
"An area for improvement in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is the complex UI and policy deployment. You have to find the policies, and then designing the policies is also tricky."
"Everything takes a long time, as it does in every software company, especially since COVID. That is something I notice with every product I use."
"I am really impressed by the interface and management console but the requirements are very high and the response time is too slow."
"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."
"The solution’s performance must be improved."
"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."
"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."
"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."
"The performance could be better."
"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is more expensive than Symantec, but it's negotiable. It depends on how well you negotiate. The solution is worth the money, though, based on the services and facilities it provides to my company."
"From one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing to be an eight."
"Forcepoint offers a more cost-effective solution because everything, including OCR, is included in one package, unlike Symantec, where it is an add-on with an additional cost."
"It's not the cheapest solution but it's not the most expensive. It's a good price for a good product."
"Forcepoint has been very cost-effective because they gave us a good deal while procuring the DLP solution."
"Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is costlier than other brands, but not all. Of the solutions, I have used Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is more costly."
"Pricing for this solution could be better."
"I prefer Forceoint because it is cheaper than Symantec."
"They offer a lot of features in a single bundle. So, if you want to remove some features from GTB, you can remove those. You don't need to buy those, and the price will reduce accordingly. I am very happy with the pricing."
"The tool is not expensive."
"The tool's pricing is affordable and based on the number of endpoints."
"When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."
"Its price is very reasonable and competitive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?
The technical support for the solution is very good.
What needs improvement with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?
They need to improve their reporting feature as well as the incident response. They have very limited and basic response rules available for incident management so they need to improve them.
What do you like most about GTB Technologies Inspector?
The product has a centralized console for everything.
What needs improvement with GTB Technologies Inspector?
The solution’s performance must be improved. Endpoint OCR affects the performance of the solution. Sometimes, the users are unable to send any emails.
What is your primary use case for GTB Technologies Inspector?
The product has an endpoint OCR, which other DLPs don't provide.
 

Also Known As

Forcepoint DLP, Forcepoint Data Security Suite, Websense Data Security Suite
Inspector, GTB Technologies DLP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Alphawest, Betsson, Cellcom Israel Ltd., Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, Confartigianato Vicenza, EverBank, Finansbank, iGATE, Landa Digital Printing, Northern California Bank, Reliance Capital, Remosa, Toyota, Scavolini, Zim Integrated Shipping Services
Supya Security Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.