Fortify WebInspect vs StackHawk comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortify WebInspect
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
2nd
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
DevSecOps (8th)
StackHawk
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
7th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the market share of Fortify WebInspect is 44.0% and it increased by 9.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of StackHawk is 4.0% and it increased by 228.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Unique Categories:
DevSecOps
15.5%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Kibeom Kim - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 18, 2023
A powerful tool catering to multiple use cases that provides reasonably good technical support
The installation phase of the product is slightly complex, making it not so easy. The product does not come in packaging, so one needs to install a database, after which one can install the product by activating the license and updating it whenever required. Fortify WebInspect has many processes involved in its installation phase compared to the other products in the market. Certain Korean products can be installed with just one step. I need to support my customers with the product's installation phase. The installation process takes a day or two to complete, but for some of my customers, it takes a month since they do not have any experience or knowledge about the product. The solution is deployed on-premises.
Use StackHawk?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."
"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."
"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."
"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."
"This solution is very expensive."
"It’s a fair price for the solution."
"The price is okay."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Government
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify WebInspect?
The solution's technical support was very helpful.
What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?
Fortify WebInspect's shortcoming stems from the fact that it is a very expensive product in Korea, which makes it difficult for its potential customers to introduce the product in their IT environm...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aaron's
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about HCLTech, OpenText, Rapid7 and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.