FortiMonitor vs GroundWork Monitor comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics
Sponsored
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
60th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
FortiMonitor
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
37th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (31st), IT Alerting and Incident Management (11th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (6th)
GroundWork Monitor
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
87th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (70th), IT Operations Analytics (19th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the market share of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is 0.4% and it decreased by 34.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of FortiMonitor is 0.5% and it decreased by 32.6% compared to the previous year. The market share of GroundWork Monitor is 0.1% and it decreased by 19.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
0.3%
 

Featured Reviews

Shiva_Prasad - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 25, 2024
A cloud solution for warehousing with a troubleshooting feature
The initial setup is straightforward. It's based on user requirements. We also conduct heat mapping using a couple of tools. The only requirement is to understand the technical or configuration aspects from the user's end and then configure it. Mist takes no more than 15 to 20 minutes for a particular deployment. You need to understand the end user's environment and have a concrete plan on whether it's a greenfield installation or an existing one, considering the density and height. Based on that, we need to develop a passive heat map. Then, you need to discuss with the user to understand exactly what needs to be configured and what they require in their environment. Based on that, you can proceed with the installation. Additionally, you can perform post-installation heat mapping to ensure it matches the earlier heat map. I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.
Javier Jacob Sanchez Partida - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 13, 2023
A monitoring tool that helps to view client infrastructure
I use FortiMonitor for monitoring purposes.  The solution helps to see client infrastructure. It has many boxes and blinks green or red when the station goes up or down. We have different domains for the device groups that we monitor.  The most valuable feature of the solution is the facility to…
it_user186582 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 17, 2016
It's easy to setup and the plugins are easy to write. When we need to, the threshold is easy to change.
It's easy to setup and the plugins are easy to write. When we need to, the threshold is easy to change It would be nice to have a centralized client-settings management. At the moment, the client settings have to be changed individually. I've used it since 2011. The deployment of the new server…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."
"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."
"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."
"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."
"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."
"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."
"FortiMonitor's price is very high."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
27%
Construction Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Non Profit
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?
We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot...
What do you like most about FortiMonitor?
In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's m...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?
Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution. Users have to pay an annual subscription fee ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Panopta
GWOS
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard
Swiss Life, JBFCS, Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.