Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs Mandiant Advantage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Group-IB Threat Intelligence
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (8th)
Mandiant Advantage
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (20th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the market share of Group-IB Threat Intelligence is 6.0% and it increased by 107.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of Mandiant Advantage is 4.1% and it decreased by 32.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
1.9%
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
10.5%
 

Featured Reviews

ALEX LOGINOV - PeerSpot reviewer
May 10, 2024
Completely satisfied with the way the report is prepared and easy to setup
We did use it for threat detection, but not directly. I analyze multiple reports, including this one, and assess my client's infrastructure. I identify threats outlined in the reports that may be relevant to the client's infrastructure, and then I help them build detection use cases. There's no automation. We don't do anything automatically at this point. It's all manual and based on analysis. I can't integrate it into automatic feeds because the report outlines threats that may not be relevant to the client's infrastructure. So, I do the analysis and integrate it manually. I'm completely satisfied with the way the report is prepared. It's a good report.
Joshua Garnett - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 9, 2023
It gives us peace of mind that issues can be addressed when our core IT team isn't working
I rate Mandiant Advantage eight out of 10. It is so valuable to have someone performing these functions outside of our business hours when we don't have staff in the building. We've seen a lot of solid metrics on the amount of malware that it's detecting and resolving. We're pleased with it so far. Our biggest concern is that the client can be a resource hog and will slow things a bit while scanning if your computer doesn't have enough processing power. It works for us because we've spent the past few years upgrading our hardware. Our typical workstation has an i7 processor, at least 16 gigs of ram, and an SSD. However, if your computers aren't that robust, you might have issues when Mandiant is scanning your device.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable Group-IB Threat Intelligence features are their detections, especially in terms of account and card information leakage. This data sets Group-IB apart from some of the competition."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the sandbox."
"The totality of the recordings is quite important. The networks, the new threat actors, the new methods, tactics, techniques, and procedures."
"We have found the site intelligence features to be the most valuable."
"Threat Intelligence's best feature is threat activation."
"The feature I have found most valuable is directory monitoring. We experienced an instance of threat actors trying to ensure a complex and massive attack against our customer's infrastructure on the forum. That is, they were animating people on a formum. The solution alerted us to this two days ahead of the attack, which gave us plenty of time to prepare for it."
"The advantage of the solution is being able to go look up threat actors and get a lot of detailed information about different attacks and different tactics and general information about threats."
"It is so valuable to have someone performing these functions outside of our business hours when we don't have staff in the building. We've seen a lot of solid metrics on the amount of malware that it's detecting and resolving. We're pleased with it so far."
 

Cons

"The web intelligence could be improved. It is not as good as the intelligence from other solutions."
"The lack of appliance-based or on-premise options for this solution is its biggest downfall. Clients request them often."
"Group-IB Threat Intelligence should improve integration for SIEM and SOAR solutions."
"Threat Intelligence's OT security could be improved."
"As the landscape evolves, they could provide a little more detail or specificity to map it to the MITRE ATT&CK framework."
"Mandiant's on-prem client is too processor-intensive, so it's putting a strain on the local device's CPU. When a scan is running on the device, the other processing tasks slow to a crawl. We're still trying to figure out the correct settings for the client."
"I think that the data query that is used for data cloud language should be improved. It's really hard to query actual data from the platform."
"They could have better support. Now that they've merged, they are moving towards a portal system, which isn't very helpful."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Group-IB Threat Intelligence's pricing is reasonable."
"Threat Intelligence is costly, but it gives value for money."
"The pricing is alright. It's right on the mark."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Group-IB Threat Intelligence?
We have found the site intelligence features to be the most valuable.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Group-IB Threat Intelligence?
The pricing is alright. It's right on the mark. It costs money, but it's not too high. It's reasonable. For me, it's a reasonable price for the quality of the product.
What needs improvement with Group-IB Threat Intelligence?
As the landscape evolves, they could provide a little more detail or specificity to map it to the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Even though it is done in the report, it could be done better.
What do you like most about Mandiant Advantage?
The feature I have found most valuable is directory monitoring. We experienced an instance of threat actors trying to ensure a complex and massive attack against our customer's infrastructure on th...
What needs improvement with Mandiant Advantage?
I think that the data query that is used for data cloud language should be improved. It's really hard to query actual data from the platform. The free tech search is also super slow and sometimes y...
What is your primary use case for Mandiant Advantage?
Our primary use case was monitoring the threat actors that our clients were concerned about. We also used Mandiant Advantage to map the infrastructure that the threat experts were using and monitor...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Mandiant Threat Intelligence
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Stater Bros. Markets, Rush Copley, Blackboat, CapWealth
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Microsoft, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.