Honeycomb.io vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Honeycomb.io
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
36th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Real User Monitoring
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
45th
Average Rating
6.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the market share of Honeycomb.io is 2.3% and it increased by 35.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.2% and it increased by 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

PR
Apr 6, 2023
A valuable solution for application teams to identify downtime and SLO-related issues
There aren't any specific use cases for the solution as such. In our company, we use the solution for SLA and SLO-related work Honeycomb.io facilitates the identification of service downtime by integrating with our logging endpoint in Splunk. We log the endpoint in Splunk, and Honeycomb.io…
YA
Oct 20, 2022
The reports and metrics we collect help us to improve our services
We use Real User Monitor to monitor services and capture problems from a user perspective, such as availability issues. The reports and metrics we collect from Real User Monitor help us to improve our services. We have around 100 users Real User Monitor has improved our productivity.  Real User…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team."
"The technical support is good at resolving issues."
"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."
"Very easy to implement."
"The reporting feature is good for us."
"The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools."
"The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application."
"Real User Monitor has improved our productivity."
 

Cons

"The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team."
"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."
"This technology is considered to be older."
"When we want to monitor our encrypted traffic, this product doesn't work because our cipher is not supported."
"One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap."
"Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel."
"Some issues with login errors."
"We would like to see support for non-Windows environments."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Not expensive."
"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."
"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
31%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Honeycomb.io?
The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team.
What needs improvement with Honeycomb.io?
The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team. It would be good if Honeycomb.io could integrate with third-party tools or paid se...
What is your primary use case for Honeycomb.io?
There aren't any specific use cases for the solution as such. In our company, we use the solution for SLA and SLO-related work.
What do you like most about Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
Real User Monitor has improved our productivity.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel.
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
We use Real User Monitor to monitor services and capture problems from a user perspective, such as availability issues. The reports and metrics we collect from Real User Monitor help us to improve ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM, MF RUM
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Clover Health, Eaze, Intercom, Fender
Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.