HPE Disaster Recovery Services vs Zerto comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Disaster Recovery Services
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery as a Service (19th)
Zerto
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
238
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (3rd), Cloud Backup (3rd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (2nd)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the market share of HPE Disaster Recovery Services is 0.2% and it decreased by 74.9% compared to the previous year. The market share of Zerto is 9.2% and it decreased by 18.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
Unique Categories:
Disaster Recovery as a Service
2.4%
Backup and Recovery
2.9%
Cloud Migration
9.7%
 

Featured Reviews

Use HPE Disaster Recovery Services?
Share your opinion
Shri Sharan - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 20, 2024
Is user-friendly, saves us time, and costs
We encountered some issues during Active Directory recovery. When we implemented Active Directory, we provided feedback to Zerto regarding the challenges of recovering AD from the on-premises environment to the disaster recovery site. Unlike other virtual machines, AD recovery presents unique difficulties due to its active-active nature. It's unclear whether these challenges stem from Zerto itself or limitations within Microsoft Active Directory. However, in our experience using Zerto for AD recovery compared to other technologies, we faced data discrepancies that necessitated workarounds to bring AD online at the DR site. Certain applications we migrated from production relied on Active Directory authentication. To ensure successful application functionality at the DR site, a functional AD environment was a prerequisite to application migration. Therefore, our initial step involved copying and guaranteeing a running AD instance on the DR side before application recovery. However, upon attempting application authentication on the DR side, data inconsistencies prevented successful authentication. To address this, we created an isolated clone of the AD environment and conducted tests. Through trial and error, we were able to develop workarounds to resolve the issue. Notably, these challenges were specific to Active Directory; other VMs didn't exhibit similar problems.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Zerto is more expensive than competitors, making the price difference pretty high. While it is very expensive, it's very powerful and good at what it does. The cost is why we are not leveraging it for everything in the organization. If it was dirt cheap, we would have LTR and DR on everything because it would just make sense to use it."
"I do not like the current pricing model because the product has been divided into different components and they are charging for them individually."
"Zerto is affordable."
"There may be less expensive solutions on the market but with Zerto, you get what you pay for."
"The pricing is pretty competitive to that of other options out there. When we shopped around, it was in line with the price of other solutions."
"I'd like to see better tiering for Zerto's pricing. We do multi-tier VMs. I don't think I should be paying a penalty and price for a tier-three VM where I don't need a really tight SLA like I do for a tier-one."
"The licensing is a little bit steep, but there is some value that you do get for it as well."
"Licensing is VM based so you can buy packages or single VM. Price is not low but the power of application is high, so you will get your money back."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user159711 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 9, 2014
VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto
Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?
Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...
What do you like most about Zerto?
The most valuable feature of Zerto for us is its DR capability.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?
We find Zerto's licensing model compatible with major cloud providers like Google, AWS, and Azure. The Azure pricing model is particularly cost-effective for us compared to other cloud providers. A...
 

Also Known As

HP Disaster Recovery Services
Zerto Virtual Replication
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MTS Ukraine, Trer Innovation
United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.