We performed a comparison between HPE ProLiant DL Servers and Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Lenovo and others in Rack Servers."The feature that I find the most valuable is that all alerts are integrated with HPE InfoSight. Any problem related to an HPE server can be solved remotely at L1, L2 level."
"Compatibility is the best feature of the solution."
"This solution is perfect. From the time of purchase, it was state-of-the-art, and still, after five, 10 years, they still meet our demands extremely well."
"It is very stable. I can rate it as a 99.99% stable server from HPE. There is zero downtime, especially in the ProLiant 380 series."
"It is very stable. This is the feedback that I'm getting from my customers for the hardware. It is also 100% scalable. HPE is also very specialized when it comes up to the server industry. It is not only about the rack servers; it is also about the blade servers. They were the first ones to bring these to the market more than ten years ago."
"When we need to, we can get through to technical support and get the right person."
"We decided to switch because this solution provides more memory density."
"What I like most about HPE ProLiant DL Servers is that it gives the support and hardware availability that my company requires."
"The most valuable thing about Huawei FusionServer is the fact that it's easy to use."
"The servers should include OneView for intelligence provisioning."
"The price in general, including the licensing fee, could be better."
"They should work with Microsoft to make licensing costs better. That's because the physical servers have processors with all these cores, and Microsoft now licenses Windows virtual server desktops based on the number of cores and the serving servers. So, if you got to build 10 or 20 servers on that desktop, you got to license them all with Microsoft. They should have a partnership with Microsoft to decrease the virtual licensing of servers in partnerships so that when you purchase the servers, you also get licensing for Microsoft on top of them. That's because it gets very expensive to license virtual operating systems to run on physical servers."
"The initial configuration process could be simpler."
"The product must provide time travel features."
"ProLiant servers could be more scalable. For example, some models can only contain four hard drives, but many of our customers expect six. If they were to add another extendable hard drive slot, it would be easier to sell the servers to our customers."
"Configurations could be simplified."
"Most of the servers we use are okay. However, sometimes, you need to change the parts. We'd like the solution to be more robust."
"In the next release, I'd like to see more features not in the hardware but in the platform where I can manage all the servers and the hardware of the servers."
HPE ProLiant DL Servers is ranked 2nd in Rack Servers with 156 reviews while Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers is ranked 11th in Rack Servers with 1 review. HPE ProLiant DL Servers is rated 8.6, while Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of HPE ProLiant DL Servers writes "Good availability and management console with good reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers writes "Simple to use and compatible with all other operating systems". HPE ProLiant DL Servers is most compared with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers, HPE Apollo, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers and Oracle SPARC Servers, whereas Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers is most compared with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers and Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers.
See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.
We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
