Hyper-V vs Oracle VM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyper-V
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
134
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle VM
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the market share of Hyper-V is 15.4% and it decreased by 17.4% compared to the previous year. The market share of Oracle VM is 7.6% and it increased by 24.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

AANKITGUPTAA - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 23, 2022
Issue-free, easy to set up, and allows for easy generation of virtual machines
Currently, we use the Windows Server 2022 Hyper-V server. We started the virtualization and provide two virtualized environments or operating system environments in the Windows Server itself. We run in the virtualized environment under one single Windows Server license. We started our…
SA
Dec 22, 2022
Excellent performance, scalability and flexibility; great cloning feature . Best for oracle Products
We have a data center with multiple racks. The product Oracle VM Server is deployed on two of our HP G10 servers. Comparatively this product is more flexible & reliable for oracle Applications & Databases. we have all our PROD env on this platform and It also enables us to clone an oracle app / db…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hyper-V provided freedom to spin up development and test environments. As projects were created, an environment could be created and applied."
"I like that it's easy to use."
"We appreciate how easy this solution is to implement on standalone severs."
"For me, the setup of Hyper-V was an easy process, which took only one hour from start to finish."
"The setup was straightforward and easy for our company. The deployment was fast."
"The solution's technical support is the best."
"The most valuable feature of Hyper-V is the replica service."
"We have a higher capacity server (specification wise) so there is no need to buy another additional hardware."
"If you want to access the VM from anywhere over the Internet, you put it in a public subnet. So, VMs are linked to that. The subnets are linked to it. So, it's perfectly secured if it's a private network. The security is set."
"What I like best about this product is that it's free."
"Because of the virtualization for Linux, I use just Linux basically in all VMs, a few with Windows."
"The network capabilities are good."
"It's a very mature product."
"It's not a very expensive product."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It is very useful for the project management of our company."
 

Cons

"One of the network problems I face is I cannot introduce other security layers on top of Hyper-V as you can in VMware. When it comes to the network the VMware is more flexible than Hyper-V."
"Sometimes it is a mess, and it is getting hanged. It should be something that could be easily fixed. It made us have to deal with fixing the bugs."
"I think there is room for improvement in terms of the cloud solutions."
"Hyper-V doesn't have a lot of features and is limited compared to other virtualization software."
"There is a hard limitation of 20 gigs per file with Dropbox, so you've got to overcome that by chunking the zip files into something smaller and manageable."
"I have found it difficult to manage more than one virtual machine."
"The weakness of Hyper-V is in its interaction with iSCSI protocols."
"In an upcoming release, they can improve by having better cloud integration. We are all moving towards the clouds and the integration is only through the Azure Stack, there should be tools built in to move the VMs natively to the cloud and infrastructure. Additionally, they could provide some form of multi-cloud integration."
"The usage could be easier, and more user-friendly."
"I think more Command-Line options for the product, for deployments."
"Oracle VM needs to add a backup feature."
"Integrating with the internal system is not very easy."
"Oracle VM could provide integration with backup solutions."
"I would say third-party plugins to other storage vendors. There are a lot of converged infrastructure setups; one that we have, multiple different hardware vendors. So that would be something we could definitely be looking for."
"If there are issues with the storage, then all the machines go down, even if I have a backup solution in place."
"If you do a gap analysis between VMware and Oracle VM, you can't do VM Snapshot. That's one thing you can't do. It's a sort of a snapshot, but it's not really Snapshot technology. It requires that you're running on CFS-2."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license is free."
"The pricing isn't too bad, because you can do the bare metal hypervisor, and it is pretty fair. Other competitors are more expensive."
"We did not have to pay extra money for the Failover Clustering feature."
"Hyper-V is expensive."
"I wish the licensing was simpler, and allowed for a greater number of VM's with the Microsoft standard licensing, but overall I think it's fair. The pricing is definitely fair."
"The tool's pricing is cheap."
"There is a license required to use Hyper-V and there are bundle packages you can purchase making it cheaper than other solutions, such as VMware. Additionally, if there is a lot of guest OS that requires Windows, then Microsoft becomes cheaper."
"The pricing and licensing is pretty good."
"All other vendors are selling their licenses to use the VM, but Oracle isn't doing that, which is its biggest advantage. It is free. All you have to do is get the hardware. You can create an unlimited number of VMs for free. With VMware, you have to purchase licenses for the number of VMs that you want to create. You only pay for their premium support, and even that is optional. I am now learning this product, and we can even do without the support."
"The cost of this solution is cheap. It is one of the reasons we chose Oracle VM. It is truly "pocket- friendly.""
"If you choose Oracle hardware, then this virtualization software is included along with support."
"Oracle is free of charge, although you have to have a subscription for the support."
"If you buy an Oracle server, this solution is free. You have to only pay for support."
"The licensing for Oracle VM solution is very nice because you license the box."
"The price of this product is high."
"We were able to deploy our solution at near zero cost compared to other vendors since the licenses come with our Oracle hardware."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user234735 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 10, 2015
Hyper-V 2012 R2 vs. VMware vSphere 5.5
I was won with Hyper-V 2012R2 recently and the table below based on customer RFP (edited). This articles all about technical, there is not related with TCO/ROI, licensing cost, “political”, etc. Another to noted is the Windows Server 2012 licenses is based on 2 socket CPU, meanwhile…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
31%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Educational Organization
45%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does KVM compare with Hyper-V?
KVM is better. But let's just look at the software instead of judging. Hyper-V was a free solution from Microsoft to virtualize Server or Client OS as it is a feature on Windows Server since 2008 a...
How does Proxmox VE compare with Hyper-V?
One of the best things about Proxmox VE is that it is open-source and very inexpensive. You get all of the same features as with the more well-known products. Proxmox VE is very easy to deploy - it...
What do you like most about Hyper-V?
The initial setup is not difficult at all. It is very easy.
Which is better - Oracle VM or KVM?
I would prefer if KVM was easier to scale and not so limited. Overall the product has been helpful. It is easy to use, and was quite straight-forward to set up. Since I have been using KVM, I have ...
Which is better - Oracle VM or VMware VSphere?
Oracle VM seems to me to be kind of outdated. Nevertheless, it is fairly straightforward to use and maintain. The solution can just be set and you can forget about it, and the scalability is consid...
What do you like most about Oracle VM?
If you want to access the VM from anywhere over the Internet, you put it in a public subnet. So, VMs are linked to that. The subnets are linked to it. So, it's perfectly secured if it's a private n...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Large customer base from all industries, all over the world. Two major Hyper-V customers are Telefonica and EmpireCLS.
Ambulance Victoria, Australian Finance Group (AFG), Avnet Technology Solutions, CERN, cloudKleyer, Danish Tax Authority (SKAT), Data Intensity, Dubai World, Engineers Australia, Enkitec, Groupe FLO, Guerra S.A. Implemento, s Rodovišrios, Interactive One, IT Convergence, Jesta Digital, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, KT, Kyoto Prefecture, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory / National Ignition Facility, Multinet Pakistan, National Australia Bank (NAB), Navis LLC, Overhead Door, Overstock.com, Paragon Data, Parks Victoria, Pella, Sunway Shared Services, St. Louis Metro, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., University of Massachusetts, Versace,
Find out what your peers are saying about Hyper-V vs. Oracle VM and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.