We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli CDP for Files and Veeam Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable."
"One of the best things about Veeam is that they have consistently improved on themselves since they started. Personally, I've been using Veeam since around 2013/2014 when it was only supporting certain hypervisors such as HyperV, and since then it has become truly mature enterprise-level software with a lot of versatility."
"The most valuable features are the backup and restoration of our VMs. Additionally, they add features regularly."
"The product’s configuration and settings are very easy."
"It integrates easily with third-party solutions compared to other vendors."
"I think the interface is straightforward"
"Replication and restore object in Exchange boxes with possibility to select part of Microsoft directory."
"The solution works well in two different environments, whether it is on-premises, cloud, or a combination."
"The instant VM recovery feature is the most valuable. It is a very good tool for disaster recovery. It is also easy to manage."
"We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each disk rather than allowing us to select what data we want backed."
"There needs to be more integration with VMware and the virtual machine."
"While the Veeam Backup Replication tool can mostly back up all the data in the environment, the AIX from IBM backup capabilities nowadays could stand improvement as they are not featured on a single pane of glass."
"The price can be a bit expensive."
"The Veeam portal should be better integrated with all the parts of the new release. But there's always a workaround to replicate the new solution. I'd like to have better integration with other solutions like SAP."
"There is a lot of room for improvement, but the primary issue we have is that it's not built for the cloud."
"The product is missing some commonsense features and tools for an enterprise backup recovery product,"
"The implementation was straightforward. However, we used an integrator, the process could be easier for us to do it ourselves."
"Veeam currently lacks features for backing up to network-attached storage. Veeam Backup & Replication agents do not support S3 storage. Only Veeam Backup & Replication server supports S3 storage."
Earn 20 points
IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is ranked 63rd in Backup and Recovery while Veeam Backup & Replication is ranked 1st in Backup and Recovery with 329 reviews. IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is rated 9.0, while Veeam Backup & Replication is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli CDP for Files writes "Restoration and infrastructure are extremely reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup & Replication writes "Beneficial pricing model, user friendly interface, and many free features". IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is most compared with Commvault Cloud, Arcserve UDP and IBM Spectrum Protect, whereas Veeam Backup & Replication is most compared with Acronis Cyber Protect, Azure Backup, Rubrik, Zerto and Veritas NetBackup.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.