IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository vs Oracle SOA Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere Service Regis...
Ranking in SOA Governance
7th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle SOA Suite
Ranking in SOA Governance
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (8th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the SOA Governance category, the market share of IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository is 18.8% and it increased by 350.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of Oracle SOA Suite is 25.0% and it decreased by 25.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
SOA Governance
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Application Infrastructure
5.1%
 

Featured Reviews

Use IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository?
Share your opinion
ES
Sep 28, 2023
Easy to setup, provides good support and scalable solution
The features we've been installing are really, really robust. The only challenge that we have down here is that most individuals have not improved so much. But the features are quite mature. The only tenant is that they would not have enough knowledge to be able to interact with those features and integrate them with their systems. So, to improve other than the training or the performance of those that are using the package. Another area of improvement is performance. Because with multiple solutions connecting to the SOA platform, in time, the performance of the SOA platform can be affected. So, that could be one area that could be improved with the SOA. Also, licensing is another area of improvement. It seems to be a high cost, especially for our customers. So that is something that we might look at improving.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"This product is WebLogic based, hence it can be both resource hungry as well as expensive from a licensing point of view."
"The product is moderately priced."
"Oracle pricing is expensive. Support is based on your license. AWS is much better than Oracle in this regard."
"Based on my knowledge, Oracle SOA Suite doesn't have user-based licensing. It has a system-based licensing model, so you pay for whole systems. Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution, so it's a four out of ten for me."
"The pricing is not very high as compared to its competitors."
"It is necessary to evaluate the requirement regarding the platform usage and what the main operation area of the platform will be."
"Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SOA Governance solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Oracle SOA Suite?
The solution's XSLT or XSL Transformation feature was very useful.
What needs improvement with Oracle SOA Suite?
The solution’s initial setup is complex and could be improved. A big challenge for Oracle SOA Suite is that you don't get too many technical resources.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

WebSphere Service Registry and Repository
SOA Suite
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ZAO Raiffeisenbank
7-Eleven, Arcor SAIC, Banca Transilvania, Eaton Corporation, Emdeon, Ferrovial, Griffith University, National Instruments, Pella Corporation, Vodafone Group Plc,
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, SAP, Aurea and others in SOA Governance. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.