Imanami GroupID vs Oracle Identity Governance comparison

Imanami and Oracle are both solutions in the User Provisioning Software category. Imanami is ranked #14, while Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.5. Imanami holds a 1.4% mindshare in UP, compared to Oracle’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Imanami users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Imanami GroupID

Read 3 Imanami GroupID reviews

769 Views
292 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Identity Governance

Read 71 Oracle Identity Governance reviews

2,390 Views
1,219 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Imanami GroupID

Oracle Identity Governance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Imanami GroupID and Oracle Identity Governance compete in the identity management sector. Imanami GroupID is favored for its affordability and support, while Oracle Identity Governance is recognized for its advanced features that cater to complex IT environments.

Features: Imanami GroupID offers user-friendly directory management, automation capabilities, and enhances productivity. Oracle Identity Governance provides robust access management, compliance tools, and caters to complex IT environments. The main distinction is Oracle's advanced features for extensive management needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imanami GroupID ensures straightforward deployment with strong customer service, ideal for organizations with limited IT resources. Oracle Identity Governance is more complex but benefits large enterprises with dedicated IT departments due to its range of identity management functionalities.

Pricing and ROI: Imanami GroupID presents a cost-effective setup, leading to faster ROI for smaller organizations or those with budget constraints. Oracle Identity Governance requires a more significant initial investment, but its expansive capabilities offer greater long-term ROI for those seeking comprehensive identity solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Imanami GroupID

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (33rd), Active Directory Management (19th)

Oracle Identity Governance

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

8th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (18th), Mobile Identity (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the User Provisioning Software category, the mindshare of Imanami GroupID is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Identity Governance is 4.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Provisioning Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Identity Governance	4.5%
Imanami GroupID	1.4%
Other	94.1%

User Provisioning Software

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Cauthorn

Identity and Access Management Manager at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement

I'd like to see it be able to do more than just groups. I'd like it to be able to do some things with email distribution lists as well. It can do that, but there were a few things that were limiting. It was difficult to get it set up, particularly with Azure in the cloud. I'd like that to be a little bit smoother. I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools. We've got a ton of groups, and it does take quite a while to do nightly processing. This is something that definitely needs improvement.

Read full review

Hasan Afzal

General Manager Technical at Techaccess Pakistan

Comprehensive features and strong support enhance operations

Direct comparison of OIG/OIM/OAM would require several factors to count in. Other than being excellent product, it would be more convenient to have more 3rd party integrations/connectors available for main stream applications (or even databases) that require less development with frequent certifications/version updates (though this cannot be avoided altogether). Single Interface/same screen would be handy. We have not use the product for analytics for anomaly detection, as we had a blend of different products, and identity management wasn't used particularly for this purpose. Oracle suite provides comprehensive Governance The scope of the identity management or Oracle IDM/IAM/OID/OIG is vast, and while we've implemented/evaluated 30-50% of its features, it's not done at full scale to include full-fledged governance/compliance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."

"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."

"I have found the overall features to be useful."

"Good features are the RBAC and UI customization."

"Identifying connector framework for unifying provisioning capabilities from OIM."

"It is able to save time and money as everything is automated: user access provisioning, password policy management, and reporting."

"Understanding what a customer is using, what they are looking for, and allowing permissions is a challenge. We use the information we get in order to understand the behavior of the customer beyond the security and to understand what they have been doing in the last month. It's a nice way to understand what is attracting the customer and what they are clicking. That could be implemented by using this kind of application."

"The features I find most effective in Oracle Identity Governance include size and scale management, which is good for large organizations."

"This solution has improved the organization in several ways, including saving many help-desk password-reset calls, IT staff productivity, and quicker user on-boarding."

"The one thing that stands out was is the automatic sign-out when an employee goes on vacation. Identity Governance can monitor when an employee goes on vacation and returns. We use this feature to automatically disable all the employee's accounts when they go on vacation, and they're automatically enabled when they come back."

"I am able to request any access rights I need."

More Oracle Identity Governance pros

Cons

"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."

"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."

"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."

"It would be great if the Oracle Fusion Middleware team worked on making it compatible with other application servers, as it exists in OIM9.x."

"The solution should be easy to implement with components combined in one file and built-in features to integrate target applications without having to install additional connectors."

"I would not recommend Oracle Identity Governance to others since its architecture and design do not solve modern world problems effectively."

"Automation of validation exercises performed by humans over Recon Exceptions generated as a result of an access synchronization event over a user's need for access or not."

"The product's initial setup phase is difficult compared to other tools."

"They need to improve their backup strategy."

"The development and the administration side could be a lot more intuitive and easier to use than it currently is, in terms of functionality and what it tries to achieve as a Single Sign-On entity for an enterprise environment."

"OIA needs to improve its governance features."

More Oracle Identity Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"It is on a yearly basis, and it has the product license fee and the support for it. So, there is the licensing fee, and there is the annual maintenance that includes the support. I don't remember exactly, but we're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 to $30,000 for it per year. We've got a pretty large implementation of it, and for the amount that we do, it is a pretty good deal. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"Oracle licenses are expensive. I suggest making pricing and licensing decisions that align with architectural requirements and the project's budget."

"The price is based on the number of users per year."

"Oracle Identity Governance is expensive."

"The licensing is expensive."

"Oracle Identity Governance is an expensive solution."

"The cost of support and upgrading to the next release are both expensive."

"I do not know specific pricing but the product is expensive when compared to other OIM products."

"I can't say much about the pricing for Oracle Identity Governance because it's different from one geography to another. In India, the license price costs less than in other geographies."

More Oracle Identity Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Provisioning Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle Identity Governance?

Role-based access control (RBAC) has been crucial for role-based management in my current company. Granular access restrictions based on role-based policies were beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Identity Governance?

Whether Oracle Identity Governance is affordable or slightly expensive depends on the category. For a small-scale company or organization, I don't think it will be useful, but for a large-scale ent...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Identity Governance?

I see areas for improvement, as they need to introduce more connectors; they have around 20 plus connectors currently but can improve in that area. The only thing bothering me is the connectors, as...

See all answers

Comparisons

e-trust Horacius vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 21% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 19% of the time

One Identity Active Roles vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 18% of the time

Fischer Identity Governance vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 11% of the time

OneLogin vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 10% of the time

More Imanami GroupID Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 15% of the time

One Identity Manager vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Identity Manager vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 5% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 5% of the time

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Identity Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Provisioning Software

January 2026

Download Imanami GroupID product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Identity Governance

January 2026

Download Oracle Identity Governance product report

Also Known As

No data available

Oracle Identity Manager, Oracle IAM, Oracle Identity and Access Management Suite

Overview

Groups don’t live forever. Project teams disband, departments re-organize, and employees change status. GroupID from Imanami leverages the pervasiveness of Microsoft® Active Directory and empowers IT professionals with the tools needed to effectively provision and manage users. Users can be quickly entered into the correct distribution and security groups, and are easily managed across multiple systems.

There Are Three Main Benefits To A Complete Group Management Solution:

Reduce the load on the IT staff and helpdesk
Improve employee productivity by putting users in the correct distribution groups immediately
Improve security by having each security group’s membership accurate immediately

Groups Are Never Out Of Date.

Users are empowered to solve common problems independently. Security and access aren’t compromised. IT is empowered with the right tools to help employees. Staff productivity goes up. What more could you want?

Imanami

Oracle Identity Governance (OIG) is a very versatile and robust enterprise identity management solution that offers functional and business performance competence by supplying centralized administration and total automation of identity and client provisioning events throughout the organization and user applications. Oracle Identity Governance monitors the complete identity and role process to satisfy rapidly changing business and complex compliance regulations and quickly delivers critical reporting and compliance capabilities.

Oracle Identity Governance is designed to easily identify which users have approved access to specific applications and other resources. It does this by using processes such as segregation of duties (SOD), role-based access control (RBAC), certifications, and access requests.

Oracle Identity Governance Features

Self-service wizard: Oracle Identity Governance has worked to make the onboarding of applications significantly easier. It no longer takes numerous steps and technical expertise. The self-service wizard makes the process simple and user-friendly.
Self-service APIs: This gives Oracle Identity Governance users an improved user experience (UX). The REST APIs for user self-service can be used for both web and mobile users. Oracle Identity Governance users are easily able to view user accounts and roles, in addition to being able to complete self-service tasks such as forgotten passwords, registration, and more.
Certification: Oracle Identity Governance offers many certification options, such as a custom access reviewer, group reviewing support, and designate certifications by completed percentage. OIG can also focus on specific role access and anomalies for access beyond a user-defined role (UDF).
Integration connectors: Oracle Identity Governance has many integration connector options for both cloud and on-premises deployments. Popular categories include Oracle Identity Cloud Service (IDCS) and traditional and hybrid systems such as Fusion Applications (FA). OIG also integrates well with connectors to Database Application Tables (DBAT), scripting tools, and web services. OIG offers several integration connectors with many of today’s top SaaS applications, such as Dropbox, Google Apps, Office 365, ServiceNow, and WebEx.

Reviews from Real Users

“The one thing that stands out was the automatic sign-out when an employee goes on vacation. Identity Governance can monitor when an employee goes on vacation and returns. We use this feature to automatically disable all the employee's accounts when they go on vacation, and they're automatically enabled when they come back. We can also automatically delete the employee's accounts when they're dismissed. Oracle has a model that gives you precise reports. It's called Crystal, and it's similar to JasperReports, so we can derive reports from this database. “ - Fabio L., Partner at a tech services company.

“We are using Oracle Identity Manager for the management of the identity cycle. We have a human resources system as a source, and we have some custom-made applications as a destination of the changes in the identities. - A PeerSpot user who is a Project Manager at a government “

Oracle

Sample Customers

Grant Thornton LLP

Werkbank, Oshkosh, PeerPay, Boingo, Kellogg's, Pella, Slanska, Avaya, D+M

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance

February 2026

Free Report: Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance report.

See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors.

We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.