Jira vs Polarion Requirements comparison

Atlassian and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Requirements Management category. Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5, while Siemens is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. Atlassian holds a 11.8% mindshare in ARM, compared to Siemens’s 16.3% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Siemens users who would recommend it.

Jira

Read 278 Jira reviews

13,931 Views
2,508 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Polarion Requirements

Read 15 Polarion Requirements reviews

2,635 Views
2,635 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Jira

Polarion Requirements

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Polarion Requirements and Jira are project management and requirement tracking tools. While Polarion shines in structured requirement management, Jira is preferred for its flexible, agile project management features, giving it an edge due to its extensive integrations.

Features: Polarion emphasizes traceability, customizable workflows, and linked work items, making it suitable for regulated industries. Key features include link tracing, sequence training, and book entry. Jira excels with agile boards, third-party integrations, and customizable dashboards. Key features include issue and bug tracking, powerful API integrations, and agile boards.

Room for Improvement: Polarion could improve its integration ease with third-party tools and enhance its user interface for more intuitive navigation. It could also benefit from a wider range of pre-configured templates. Jira could improve in handling large datasets without performance issues and enhance support for complex project setups. It lacks automatic capacity planning and advanced workload forecasting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Polarion offers an on-premises deployment option with dedicated customer support, ideal for controlled environments. Jira is cloud-based, backed by extensive online resources and community support, aligning well with teams needing scalable access.

Pricing and ROI: Polarion involves a higher initial setup cost, justified by its depth in requirements management. Jira's subscription model is cost-effective, allowing quick deployment and ROI, making it appealing to startups and agile teams.

To learn more, read our detailed Jira vs. Polarion Requirements Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. Polarion Requirements

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jira

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

278

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Project Management Software (1st)

Polarion Requirements

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

4th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of Jira is 11.8%, down from 15.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion Requirements is 16.3%, up from 15.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Requirements Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Jira	11.8%
Polarion Requirements	16.3%
Other	71.9%

Application Requirements Management

Featured Reviews

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Agile workflows have streamlined sprint planning and tracking for faster feature delivery

Jira has a very good interface and it is very easy to manage sprints, tasks, and epics. The main feature is the hierarchy, as features can be converted into epics and topics, allowing bigger tasks to be partitioned into smaller ones. The hierarchy feature in Jira helps the team significantly compared to other tools that have been used, such as Trello, which is mainly useful only for a waterfall model. For modern Agile practices, Jira is the most adapted tool in the industry. Another valuable feature is that Jira APIs have been used for data science projects to analyze tasks and get insights. This has also been very helpful in the project.

Read full review

reviewer2798628

Project Manager at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Comprehensive traceability has supported regulated projects but review workflows still need improvement

The ability to manage requirements through the whole project life is somewhat unclear. We are not using the ability to track all requirements through the whole project life for analytics very much. We have a way to easily find all the requirements of a complex product, even if they are spread over different Polarion Requirements projects. We do not have any issues in that area, but we are not really using the analytics part of Polarion Requirements. I am satisfied with the integration capabilities for Polarion Requirements, but it depends. We encountered a lot of issues with the integration with Enterprise Architect. We were in contact with Lemon Tree company, which provides support for that integration, but we eventually decided to develop our own plugins for Polarion Requirements. That is unfortunate, but we are not really happy with their implementation. There are things that are going really well, but alongside this, there are also things that are not yet implemented, which is quite annoying for us. The main point for improvement or lack of functions that I would like to address in Polarion Requirements is really about the review process, which is a bit too limited. When we are developing complex products, we have to review big life documents or a set of work items, but there are a lot of issues with that. For example, very simple things: if you select a word and not a space in the document, you are not able to add comments, and it is not user-friendly. If you know that you have to put the cursor and not select the word, that is something people can live with, but for newcomers, it is frustrating. They will ask questions such as 'I cannot add a comment about this word' or for a selection of text. That is something annoying. You can do that in a simple Word document, but not in Polarion Requirements. Also, the ability to review a table or generated dynamic content is not possible in Polarion Requirements. For example, if you generate automatically a list of tests, you cannot click on the second one; you can only click at the beginning of the generated sections. I am somewhat satisfied with Polarion Requirements' functionality, but I feel a lack of certain functions regarding the review, which is a bit too limited. The review process is the main pain point for me, especially since we are in a highly regulated environment where reviews are crucial for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our company follows the Agile methodology for software development, and this product is one of the best tools for companies that do so."

"The flexibility to create different flows is most valuable."

"Work management software that has the flexibility to be configured for any company. It's stable, scalable, and offers responsive support."

"The solution is easy to use and user-friendly."

"It's easy to deploy."

"I appreciate the openness of Jira; it is based on a concept that is well understandable and works in a logical way, allowing customization of any process that needs to be applied."

"It helps me to use virtual Scrum boards across four locations, three time zones, and to plan my work. It fully supports the Scrum approach, and the Agile way of working, and it has Agile thinking behind it.."

"Jira is easy to use and there are a lot of tools that are integrated with it."

More Jira pros

"It is easier to produce documents using the platform."

"Polarion Requirements' most valuable features are link tracing, book entry, and sequence training features."

"The solution is especially great for organizing folders effectively."

"The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now. We have very complex products. We make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, etc. To get the overview of all the requirements into a system, at that sizing, is the main advantage we have in the organization now."

"The most beneficial features of Polarion Requirements for traceability include the traceability function and also the historical and matchmaking or cross-referencing, which was very good."

"I would say there is value in how powerful, configurable, and user-friendly it is."

"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."

"A valuable feature from my side would be the comparison corporization."

More Polarion Requirements pros

Cons

"Something I do not like about the new version is that there is a need to browse all the way back to the beginning, should a person click on a task that is specifically for his group and wish to go back and look at the other portfolios or people."

"It is not capturing the number of hours for which each person has worked on certain things. We use many add-ons to let resources enter the time in the user story itself. We use an add-on called Tempo, but it is kind of a lousy add-on. It is not straightforward. Rather than helping us, it creates a lot of confusion. So, instead of looking out for the additional add-on, I would prefer to have the timesheet entered as a part of Jira itself. They are anyways capturing every information they could for each user story, and then we are able to break down all the task lists. For each task, we're also assigning a resource. So, while we're doing it, why can't they allow the users to enter the time that can be created as a report? Right now, we need to acquire the add-on, and the add-on is not great. It is not helping. The add-on is also not free."

"This solution could be improved by including a different model for the overall planning perspective. There's a Jira portfolio that we aren't using. The only challenge we're facing is that we cannot see the overall planning."

"ClickUp is a good alternative to Jira, so they have a better interface [GUI]. I don't like Jira's graphical interface - it could be more user-friendly. Jira looks old school."

"it would be helpful to have a better tutorial for learning and to have a better understanding of what the features are and what they do."

"Tracking is important but the built-in features don't meet our needs."

"It should have its own repository for test case creation, so that one does not have to resort to third-party tools and plugins."

"I would like to see more robust release management within the tool."

More Jira cons

"The risk assessment functionality needs improvement, like FMEA risk management."

"In my opinion, the main area for improvement in Polarion Requirements is its user interface. It should be easier for engineers to understand how it works, as many features are not very easily understandable for end-users."

"Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature."

"We encountered numerous challenges, such as issues with requirements, project management, timing, and planning. The main problem with Polarion at the outset, I believe, was our limited understanding of the planning phase. During that time, we were more focused on change management related to requirements. Recognizing the importance of planning has been a key realization for us. Another mistake we made was not comprehending the need to document these requirements to manage all the work items effectively. Now, we understand the significance of this documentation. As a result of these insights, we have started to see a growing number of competitors from Polarion in this field. One potential improvement could be enabling Polarion to export work items not just to Microsoft Office but also to other office tools."

"It is not a stable solution, as we had issues with shared licenses."

"If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable."

"The areas of Polarion Requirements that have room for improvement include usability, and the user interface, which was a little bit poor."

"One thing to consider is increased flexibility in terms of workflow configuration."

More Polarion Requirements cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our client handles the licensing aspect. They have not yet purchased the premium version."

"It is subscription-based, and we probably pay yearly. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of price."

"I don't feel that price is an issue."

"We feel that the product is a good value for the cost."

"The cost is about $10 per user, per month."

"Compared to the value Jira provides, it’s not that expensive. It has an yearly licensing cost."

"It is very cheap if you forego the local instance and stick to the cloud."

"There are other solutions that are free making this solution seem expensive in comparison."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

"The pricing model is flexible. You don't have to pay for the full functionalities. And it's a one-time investment for the licenses. You purchase what you need and then can work with that."

"I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"Polarion Requirements is a little pricey."

"The product's price is high."

"It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions."

"I believe the cost is subjective. It seems a bit pricey, but it depends on your perspective. To provide some context, I compared the prices with GitLab and Jira. Unfortunately, I couldn't find Jira's prices. However, GitLab costs around 40 euros, and DeepLab, which I recently discovered, also falls in a similar price range. I'm not sure about DeepLab's features or interface improvements, as they might have been implementing requirements management over the past six months. In contrast, Polarion costs around 50 to 60 euros based on the 2021 prices I have. While it may seem a bit expensive, it's worth considering whether the additional investment, perhaps around 68 euros per user, is justified. It might appear costly at first glance, but it's essential to acknowledge that it can greatly streamline your work processes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

29%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	106
Midsize Enterprise	56
Large Enterprise	150

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

Jira itself is fairly priced for the features it provides, but pricing is a bit higher than some alternatives, mostly because many plugins and add-ons are paid and licensed per user. So even if onl...

See all answers

What do you like most about Polarion Requirements?

In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have work...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polarion Requirements?

I purchased Polarion Requirements directly from Siemens Benelux, but if you have any ideas to get a license at a better price, we are quite interested in discussing that.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polarion Requirements?

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 6% of the time

Asana vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

Rally Software vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

More Jira Competitors

IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 72% of the time

Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 11% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 6% of the time

Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Dimensions RM vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 2% of the time

More Polarion Requirements Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jira

January 2026

Download Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

Polarion Requirements

January 2026

Download Polarion Requirements product report

Also Known As

Jira Software

No data available

Overview

Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate.

Jira Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:

DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides application developers with tools that enable them to track and visualize where they are in the development process. This means that a DevOps team can measure their progress at all times. Jira’s roadmapping feature also enables a DevOps team to work more efficiently by setting goals for their projects, keeping them on track. Additionally, they are able to track whether they are meeting the goals that they set for their projects.

Regular product updates. Atlassian is constantly updating Jira so that it is continuously evolving into an ever more powerful and user-friendly solution. Users can be sure that the product that they are using is always being tweaked so as to provide them with the best possible project management solution.

Flexibility. Jira enables users to customize their workflows and dashboard so that the solution is operating in a way that best matches their needs. Jira can also integrate with more than 3,000 other applications and integrations. Organizations can use it to expand their project management and DevOps capabilities in many different ways.

Jira Features

Security capabilities. Jira is equipped with a number of useful security features. It gives administrators the ability to restrict access to certain tools so that only users who are authorized to complete certain tasks have access to the tools related to the completion of that task. Users can also set default permissions so that only particular users can work on new projects or particular projects.

Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.
Activity log. Jira has the ability to track any and all changes that are taking place within the software framework. Users can keep a close eye on everything that is going on. This promotes a high level of visibility and can be leveraged to aid developers in their collaboration efforts.

Reviews from Real Users

Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard.

Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”

Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.”

Atlassian

Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments.

Siemens

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. Polarion Requirements

February 2026

Free Report: Jira vs. Polarion Requirements

Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. Polarion Requirements and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jira vs. Polarion Requirements report.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.