KNIME vs Lytics Conductor comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

KNIME
Ranking in Data Mining
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Data Science Platforms (4th)
Lytics Conductor
Ranking in Data Mining
14th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Customer Data Analysis (17th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Data Mining category, the market share of KNIME is 19.7% and it decreased by 28.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of Lytics Conductor is 0.7% and it increased by 144.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Mining
Unique Categories:
Data Science Platforms
11.8%
 

Featured Reviews

LM
Jan 10, 2023
Simple to learn, useful no code platform, and quick and efficient
There are many valuable features in KNIME. One of the most useful aspects is that it can read a wide variety of data file types. Additionally, the ability to manipulate data, such as deleting rows or columns, is very helpful. I also use many of the nodes for analyzing data, such as doing frequencies and cross tabs. I have used it for machine learning tasks, like decision trees and random forests. It also has neural network capabilities, but I am not an expert in that area, so I cannot comment on it. It's a very powerful and simple tool to use. KNIME has met all of my needs so far. It has excellent data visualization capabilities. Additionally, it has a text analysis package, which I haven't used. However, I am satisfied with the features currently available and it has a strong support community.
Use Lytics Conductor?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution that is free to use."
"KNIME is free and open source."
"The price of KNIME is quite reasonable and the designer tool can be used free of charge."
"There is no cost for using KNIME because it is an open-source solution, but you have to pay if you need a server."
"They have different versions, but I am using the open-source one."
"It is free of cost. It is GNU licensed."
"With KNIME, you can use the desktop version free of charge as much as you like. I've yet to hit its limits. If I did, I'd have to go to the server version, and for that you have to pay. Fortunately, I don't have to at the moment."
"The client versions are mostly free, and we pay only for the KNIME server version. It's not a cheap solution."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Mining solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Educational Organization
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about KNIME?
Since KNIME is a no-code platform, it is easy to work with.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KNIME?
We're using the free academic license just locally. I went for KNIME because they have a free academic license. And to be honest, I never bothered to check the prices.
What needs improvement with KNIME?
KNIME is not good at visualization. I would like to see NLQ (Natural language query) and automated visualizations added to KNIME.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

KNIME Analytics Platform
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Infocom Corporation, Dymatrix Consulting Group, Soluzione Informatiche, MMI Agency, Estanislao Training and Solutions, Vialis AG
Nestle, R/GA, DIRECTV, The Clymb, Cond_ Nast
Find out what your peers are saying about Knime, Weka, IBM and others in Data Mining. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.