Meraki MX vs Sophos UTM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Meraki MX
Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sophos UTM
Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
110
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category, the market share of Meraki MX is 19.9% and it increased by 6.6% compared to the previous year. The market share of Sophos UTM is 24.7% and it increased by 43.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Unified Threat Management (UTM)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Q&A Highlights

MD
Dec 13, 2019
 

Featured Reviews

PP
Oct 24, 2023
Great solution that can manage multiple devices (security, switches, APs, Cameras) with a single pane of glass
Some advanced enterprise features are missing, so Meraki MX is not for demanding enterprise networks as it lacks high-level features (including SSL inspection). As for SSL inspection, I think this is better performed on the Client PC where the inspection can be performed before or after the SSL encryption is done. Look at a solution like SentinalOne for this. This type of solution is going to be less prone to problems with SSL inspection. Additionally, the native client VPN uses native OS VPN connectivity in Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux. While this is nice from the perspective of no license fees to have a client VPN, there are sometimes issues when drivers or OS updates are released that impact client VPN connectivity. DrayTek makes VPN client software that works with the MX but it is not officially supported by Meraki. I'm not a fan of any security appliance's VPN as they typically allow access to everything on the corporate network. Specific VPN solutions like Absolute allow you to create granular access control to resources inside your firewall. I think having that level of control is a huge security plus. More recently, Meraki implemented the Cisco AnyConnect VPN client with the MX and that is a more reliable solution than using the VPN built into Windows. I highly recommend using that or a 3rd party ZTNA solution. There are so many options available when you are looking to create your security stack. In my experience, I've found that putting all your requirements on one solution will usually result in some level of disappointment. On the Meraki dashboard is a “Make a Wish” button to request new features. I have made multiple wishes and they were all granted.
Wisnu Nursahid - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 5, 2022
Good visibility and protection against ransomware attacks
Sophos UTM gives good visibility and prevention against ransomware attacks because they focus on unknown threats, so it's successful in protecting customers Sophos UTM's best feature is SIM in the cloud, which combines the gateway solution and endpoint solution to send telemetry data to the cloud…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is very easy to use and manage. It is also very easy to scale."
"Intrusion detection and prevention (IDS/IPS): The best feature. It can detect malware, even a virus, and warn you by email about the device that has it. When the Meraki detects that something is wrong, it automatically blocks the connection or the intrusion, delivering a graphic report with all the necessary content."
"Both the scalability and the scalability are great with Meraki MX."
"Traffic Shaping: The device lets you decide how you want to use your internet services. Due to the fact that Meraki can accept dual WAN, you can decide the way you balance the data traffic."
"Site to Site VPN: The device can establish a VPN connection to multiple sites in a mesh environment in seconds, and without complex VPN knowledge."
"The dashboard is very intuitive and easy to understand."
"The cloud management system is really valuable."
"I think cloud management is key. The cloud management and support are the two things that make the product great."
"It is a very good product. The threat monitoring process is the most valuable feature."
"Sophos UTM's best feature is SIM in the cloud, which combines the gateway solution and endpoint solution to send telemetry data to the cloud and provides full contact visibility regarding security."
"​The initial configuration is straightforward thanks to the web GUI. In 30 minutes, you can have a running firewall with UTM protection enabled.​"
"Good basic firewall functions with advanced firewall scanning."
"Scaling out cannot be easier, as there are many migration paths."
"It is easy to manage."
"It has made our organization more secure, because we are using a VPN. We are not accessing services directly. It allows us to segregate some of the traffic for individuals which may be more of a developer role rather than an operational role needing access to developer resources, but not necessarily production operational resources."
"The most valuable feature of Sophos UTM is the simple-to-use interface."
 

Cons

"It can be hard to get a hold of the solution’s technical support team."
"We do not have account managers in our region for the solution. Some governments don't use the product since it is attached to the internet."
"More detail needed for configuration of the VPN."
"MX can only be managed via a web interface, but I'm accustomed to using a CLI or a graphical interface. I would also like to see more reporting features. It doesn't provide enough information for me to know precisely about some clients."
"From the improvement perspective, we need more monitoring capabilities. We want to have full-based access visibility, such as, what is happening when something is trying to reach and it is denying. We cannot see some parts of it. The integration of active directory with this product is not very fruitful. It has some bugs or lacks in the functionality of active directory integration. We are unable to identify where exactly and whether it has really applied our policy."
"The product could incorporate tools like ThousandEyes into the system so we can see things directly."
"Load balancing options and ability to manage a couple of Internet connections."
"The product is quite complex to set up."
"We'd like to see them offer their services on mobile devices like tablets. I'm not sure if that's an option or not."
"We didn’t find any issues but I know there have been some in the last few years."
"​I am going to flat out say technical support is terrible. Being a Platinum level customer, I am not happy with the support.​"
"The logs are not clear, which means that you need an additional piece of software in order to read them clearly."
"Flexibility in pricing could be improved. It's more rigid in its pricing compared to its competitor: Kaspersky."
"The support could be better."
"There needs to be some improvement in the IPsec VPN. There is implementation only support. I have version one. I'd be most interested in having IP version two from the protocol."
"The five-factor authentication needs improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s pricing depends on the discount Cisco gives to different people."
"The solution is expensive."
"Meraki is also expensive, but it's a little bit less expensive and it's easier to configure than Cisco ASA."
"Meraki MX's pricing is cheaper as compared to Cisco's standalone products."
"Our customers pay for the solution on a monthly basis."
"Pricing varies as per the type of license."
"I rate the tool's price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive."
"The product's price depends on use cases."
"The solution is affordable compared to others, such as FortiGate. The price is important."
"We purchased the appliance with five years onsite support and licenses."
"This product is free for home users. The more expensive products have better performance."
"The pricing is pretty reasonable. I don't think that it is overly expensive."
"We pay for the service on a yearly basis. The last time we paid was in June, for a year. At the time, it was about $20,000."
"You cannot really say that the solution is expensive, given the protection it gives."
"If you can afford it, go for a small Check Point, as it is easier to manage."
"The price is comparable to other products of this kind."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user216600 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 3, 2016
Sophos UTM vs. Fortinet FortiGate
I have used both Sophos and Fortinet products in production and I have found the Sophos UTM appliances (hardware and virtual) to be a better fit most of the time -- with a few caveats which I will touch on below. In both instances, the transition from TMG will be mostly straightforward. The main…
 

Answers from the Community

MD
Dec 13, 2019
Dec 13, 2019
I presume the topic is UTM appliances (as Meraki and Sophos have many products). Any physical site connected to the Internet needs some kind of a firewall, yes? That firewall should be at the site (if it is "in the cloud" you lose performance/time/bandwidth, and you still might get a man-in-the-middle issue). For 30-80 users, for devices with prices under $5000 with taxes and shipment (for ap...
2 out of 5 answers
CG
Dec 12, 2019
When it comes to Security, I have very good experiences with Sophos, I can say the security solution is absolutely great in Sophos. Whereas I have never used Meraki, so I can't comment anything on it. SD-WAN; no experience on any of the requested products, so better not to make any false comment/advice.
it_user1150056 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 12, 2019
To be honest, if you are still buying firewall appliances and UTM licenses you are already behind a very obvious requirement to move to Cloud security. Buying UTM does not solve the growing risk of mobility and cloud application delivery. It would be worthwhile reading Gartner's SASE paper on security transformation. Or research Zscaler, who has been delivering this model for 10 years. If a user is in your network behind your UTM, what stops him from connecting to his mobile phone Hotspot and bypassing all UTM, DLP, etc. Security has to move from the network to the endpoint. Protection regardless of location, device or network. Anything less is a massive compromise and a false sense of actual security.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
22%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
5%
Retailer
5%
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Fortigate 60d vs. Meraki MX67 for a small company without a dedicated IT Department
We have Meraki Mx devices now, we are looking to replace them. But that is because the Meraki MX platform lacks SSL Inspection, Granular Firewall rules (Block only, no allow setting), client vpn re...
Which is better - Meraki MX or Cisco ASA Firewall?
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software is the operating software for the Cisco ASA suite. It supports network security and firewall options. We researched both Meraki and ASA. We liked t...
What do you like most about Meraki MX?
I am happy with the technical support for the solution. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten.
What are the biggest technical differences between Sophos UTM and Fortinet FortiGate?
As a solution, Sophos UTM offers a lot of functionality, it scales well, and the stability and performance are quite good. The most valuable features for me are their web and email filtering. I wou...
What Is The Biggest Difference Between Sophos UTM and Sophos XG?
The Sophos UTM is a UTM and Sophos XG is the NGFW. First, you must know about the difference between a UTM and NGFW. They can not be compared with each other because the price, license, firewall th...
What do you like most about Sophos UTM?
The most valuable feature of Sophos UTM is the endpoint protection feature.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

MX64, MX64W, MX84, MX100, MX400, MX600
Astaro
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hyatt, ONS
One Housing Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Meraki MX vs. Sophos UTM and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.