Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs OneTrust DataGovernance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...
Ranking in Data Governance
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Microsoft Security Suite (7th)
OneTrust DataGovernance
Ranking in Data Governance
24th
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Data Governance category, the market share of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 24.1% and it decreased by 13.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of OneTrust DataGovernance is 2.6% and it decreased by 23.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance
Unique Categories:
Microsoft Security Suite
5.3%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

SAURABH-PRAMANICK - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 28, 2023
User friendly with good documentation but needs to cover more non-Microsoft use cases
Non-Microsoft use cases are not very high. It's limited for now. They are continuously trying to evolve and trying to provide the latest right now. It is mature only on the more popular open source kind of applications or source tools. That is a limitation that it brings in. That said, if you already have a complete Microsoft stack then it will work really well. They still need more coverage on Microsoft Dynamics 365. It's an area they are still working on. The lineage data capabilities could be improved. They need data quality as a solution. They need to have that as part of their suite. If I want to drive governance and adoption, when it comes to dashboarding and understanding maturity, it still needs work. There are other better, more competitive tools.
FC
Sep 6, 2023
Provides visibility and helps manage data usage and cookie preferences
We use the solution to manage data usage and cookie preferences on any of our company’s websites The product provides visibility across the scope of companies we have. The tool gives us the ability to trace the path of an incident. It helps us find the issue's origin and the risks involved.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the tracking activity and device onboarding."
"It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies."
"It starts off with records management, insider risk management, and information protection. And there is the discovery of the clouds, and we can get analytics on that as well, so that we know which user is using which cloud application and for how much time. The Activity explorer tells us which user was transferring out what data at what moment and on which device, including the serial number."
"We can prevent, block, or audit however we like."
"Their data labeling or data classification is particularly valuable because we want to categorize all of our data into confidential, public, or internal."
"It's certainly easy to work with all Microsoft data sources like SQL Server, Synapse, and data lakes, but it also has great functionality working with Oracle. And of particular interest to us is the ability to pull data from Excel, CVS files, and other types of flat files."
"The availability of pre-designed policies tailored to specific geolocations and customer requirements is a valuable feature."
"The audit log has been a lifesaver for a lot of reasons. Historically, when using SaaS products, there were always questions about how the audit was going and whether we were sufficient out of the box. Purview has many capabilities available through centralized reporting that provide a view of a specific segment."
"This product makes it easy to manage personal data."
"The tool gives us the ability to trace the path of an incident."
"One valuable aspect of the solution is its cloud-based nature. Users can just pay the fees and get started instantly."
 

Cons

"There are some non-Microsoft file formats that are not supported."
"Setting up Purview in a production tenant proved challenging due to a lack of clear documentation on permission requirements."
"There is room for improvement when it comes to Purview's data connector platform in supporting ingestion from non-Microsoft data sources."
"We have had a lot of issues since we moved to Unified Support. There have been work gaps there, and we believe they fixed them, but we need to make sure that they are going to be sustainable. It is to be seen."
"If we could have a view something like we have in CrowdStrike—which is, I believe, the biggest competitor to Microsoft when it comes to security—a node nodal view, which we also have in Defender, that would make it a more complete, one-stop solution. That would save a lot of time for the admins and the engineers."
"Some of the menu headings may not be easy to understand for some people."
"The Microsoft Purview data connector platform, which supports ingestion from non-Microsoft data sources, can be somewhat complex."
"Purview's data loss prevention for macOS endpoints has some limitations, and the end-user experience of recovering from a failure is lacking."
"Deployment is a big issue."
"The integration with third-party products could be better."
"The tool is an amalgam. It's a collection of loosely integrated pieces and parts that don't work well together. There is room for improvement there. My team reached out to the support team, and their experience was not satisfactory."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Purview is expensive."
"Microsoft Purview has a pay-per-use pricing model, so it's one of the most cost-effective tools, as your cost will be based on your usage. It's a pricing model that Microsoft has nailed down, making it great whether you're a small organization or a multinational, giant organization."
"The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive."
"Microsoft Purview is the best option I have encountered when it comes to price. Maybe some of my information is outdated, but Microsoft offered it so that you could use it almost without paying."
"Currently, the licensing differs for the governance side compared to the risk and compliance side."
"I consider it cost-efficient because of the metrics it provides."
"The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."
"We pay $15,000 per end user for the E5 license."
"The solution is a low-cost option."
"The product is worth every penny."
"There is a licensing fee that we pay regularly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?
It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?
Currently, the licensing differs for the governance side compared to the risk and compliance side. On the governance side, the charges are based on the usage of Purview, including the data map, dat...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?
Data quality has been a highly requested feature among customers. While it was initially scheduled for release in December last year, I anticipate that this feature will be available soon this year...
What do you like most about OneTrust DataGovernance?
One valuable aspect of the solution is its cloud-based nature. Users can just pay the fees and get started instantly.
What needs improvement with OneTrust DataGovernance?
The tool is an amalgam. It's a collection of loosely integrated pieces and parts that don't work well together. There is room for improvement there.
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Anthony Nolan, Everis, Herman Miller, Provident Financial Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. OneTrust DataGovernance and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.