Microsoft Virtual Server vs NextAxiom HyperService comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Virtual Server
Ranking in Application Virtualization
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NextAxiom HyperService
Ranking in Application Virtualization
9th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

WK
Feb 19, 2024
Provides an ease of navigation, but the deployment process poses a few challenges
We use Microsoft Virtual Server for a manual approach to deploying and managing virtual machines. It involves logging in to the Virtual Server and performing tasks such as initiating remote services, executing updates, and installing necessary components. It has proven to be most effective for workloads associated with running web portals. While we do not engage in highly complex integrations, the product seamlessly accommodates our integration requirements. The platform is scalable. We can easily scale it depending on workload. It works flexibly for scaling down when the workload decreases as well. I advise others to consider the server size that aligns with their current needs rather than opting for extremes. It would help in optimizing the prices and making it economical. I rate it a seven out of ten.
it_user6606 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 23, 2013
Outstanding Customer Service, Rapid Development & Great Debugging but has a Cluttered Look
NextAxiom HyperService Studio 7 Pros: Outstanding Customer Service – I have never experienced Customer Service at the level NextAxiom provides. Generally you expect an email sent to ‘support’ to get lost in the shuffle and perhaps – if the stars align – you’ll get an email back from a CSR – only…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product could be better."
"It is an expensive product."
"The cost can also be optimized by changing the size of the implementation."
"There is no need for me to pay anything towards the solution's licensing costs."
"Microsoft Virtual Server’s licensing is expensive."
"Compared to the other products in the market, I believe that the prices of Microsoft Virtual Server are on the higher side."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is a low-cost solution."
"The pricing must be improved."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Virtual Server?
Customization must be improved. The tool must provide more freedom to the customer.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Virtual Server, MS Virtual Server
HyperService
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Paylocity, ASELSAN, Sochi Organizing Committee, Supervisor of Elections, Orange County, Florida, Netgem, Nav Canada, The British & Irish Lions
American Electric Power, Basin Electric Power, Battelle Energy Alliance, Dakota Gas, Duke Energy, Florida Power & Light (FPL), Idaho National Labs (INL)
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.