Mule Anypoint Platform vs webMethods.io Integration comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Mule Anypoint Platform
Ranking in Cloud Data Integration
3rd
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (8th)
webMethods.io Integration
Ranking in Cloud Data Integration
23rd
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
API Management (29th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the market share of Mule Anypoint Platform is 13.6% and it decreased by 13.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of webMethods.io Integration is 3.6% and it decreased by 29.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
Unique Categories:
Business-to-Business Middleware
11.9%
Workload Automation
0.8%
API Management
0.7%
Cloud Data Integration
0.1%
 

Featured Reviews

VS
Jul 21, 2023
Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations
I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.
Berniem Elfrink - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 25, 2024
Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable
The main reason my company decided to replace webMethods.io Integration is because of the integration capabilities in the newer versions of the tool. Whenever there is a new version of webMethods.io Integrations, there is a lot of work to be done by our company since the newer versions don't offer seamless integration. The aforementioned reason can be considered for improvement in webMethods.io Integrations. With the solution, our company has experienced sudden outages at times. The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required. Not just the cost related to licensing but also the cost of introducing new versions need improvement in the product. When you have an OS like Windows or Apple, in which some new features are installed when you restart your system, after which everything works fine, with webMethods.io Integration, the new features introduced in the tool don't just need you to stop and restart your application but expects you to update the whole application to be able to use the new functionalities, which is something that is good. My company does a business in which we have to create a complete project which costs a lot of money. In the future, I expect to not be paying a lot of money or extra work to be able to update the product, and webMethods.io Integration needs to update the product automatically.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"The platform's cloud integration capabilities are good."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The solution is scalable."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
 

Cons

"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"The inclusion of GenAI in the tool can be good since it is an area that is currently unavailable in the solution."
"The tool requires programming language."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."
"The product comes complete at one set price including support."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."
"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."
"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."
"The product's price seems to be competent in comparison to other products in the market."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform really needs to work on its pricing model because it's very complicated."
"The pricing is a yearly license."
"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?
I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?
This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...
What do you like most about webMethods.io Integration?
The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product.
What needs improvement with webMethods.io Integration?
The main reason my company decided to replace webMethods.io Integration is because of the integration capabilities in the newer versions of the tool. Whenever there is a new version of webMethods.i...
What is your primary use case for webMethods.io Integration?
In my company, the solution is used for SAP Integration.
 

Also Known As

Data Integrator
webMethods Integration Cloud, Software AG webMethods Integration Cloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Autosen, A1 Digital, Cintas
Find out what your peers are saying about Mule Anypoint Platform vs. webMethods.io Integration and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.