Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange comparison

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG).

To learn more, read our detailed Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Report (Updated: May 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

May 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 787,061 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Lookout

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category, the market share of Lookout is 0.4% and it increased by 77.6% compared to the previous year. The market share of Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is 2.2% and it decreased by 19.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is 4.4% and it decreased by 32.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Unique Categories:

Mobile Data Protection

7.1%

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

0.8%

No other categories found

ZTNA as a Service

17.6%

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

10.8%

Featured Reviews

reviewer2059746

Director Endpoint Security at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Dec 22, 2022

Allows users to self-remediate security issues, maintaining their privacy and providing excellent vulnerability detection

We just submitted an enhancement request reflecting the main area we want to see improvement in; the APIs. Currently, we're able to build dashboards, but it's somewhat backward because we use our MDM API to create them. Lookout should provide APIs to customers so we can query our data and use it in the cloud, and this is the only outstanding area for improvement with the product right now. Another improvement could be a more streamlined activation process for Android and iOS; there are several prompts when activating the application on a new device, and if that could be adapted to one click, that would be beneficial.

Read full review

Kalpesh Panchal

TOC Architect at Infopercept Consulting Limited

Aug 21, 2023

A matured product in the market that offers scalability and multiple useful modules

My company uses Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway since it provides CASB and SWG, while ZTNA is something we are looking at to replace the traditional VPN SWG saves our firewall-based filtering or service costs while operating on-premises. The most valuable features of the solution are its…

Read full review

Kalyani Patil

Consultant - Cloud Security at Inspira Enterprise

Aug 23, 2023

A costly, cloud-native security platform characterized by its simplicity and user-friendliness

There are many use cases, but primarily we have been utilizing it for cloud and web security purposes The solution offers a simplified network infrastructure and security functions, and it enables secure remote access for the users. Zscaler SASE provides a wide range of security features such…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"On the outside, the main differentiation is because Lookout ingest. They have ingested basically all of the apps for the last ten years and all the versions of all the apps, and we have that in a corporate database that allows us to do very large-scale machine learning and analysis on that data set. That's not something that any of the competitors really have the capability to do because they don't have access to the data set. A lot of the apps you can no longer get them because that version of the app is five or six years old, and it just doesn't exist anywhere anymore, except within our infrastructure. So, the ability to have that very rich dataset and learn from that dataset is a real differentiator."

"The most valuable features are the antivirus as a whole, the anti-malware, and all of the protection features that scan our enterprise devices."

"The solution is stable."

"The protection offered by the product is the most valuable feature. It detects vulnerabilities or traps on our users' phones and then prompts them to clean up their devices. Tools we used previously would only discover, which required us to gather information on the backend, so Lookout is a welcome upgrade."

"Overall, the product is nice, and I like the URL filtering, CASB, and other security stacks like threat prevention."

"As Netskope is a cloud-based application, it is possible to analyze and distinguish personal and enterprise instances."

"Web filtering and DLP are good features."

"One of the valuable features of the solution is that everything is on the cloud. It has no on-premise hardware to deal with."

"There are a lot of features, but the groups that are created for the policy groups available with Netskope are already relevant to any industry. So grouping the policies is the easiest part and a valuable feature."

"We can connect cloud apps and monitor them."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its three modules, which are SWG, ZTNA, and CASB."

"Prevents data leakage and protects data."

More Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway pros

"The most valuable feature is the manageability of the micro tunnels."

"The ZPA is a unique feature which offers VPN along with all the additional security needed."

"The Live Logs are a cool feature. We can directly identify issues and divert user traffic."

"I like its ease of use. It has a single pane of glass for the ZIA and ZPA pieces. It is very manageable. It is also very easy to deploy for secure access, and it gives half-decent coverage for visibility in terms of what the users use and what data is being proxied through the access gateway."

"Yes, it is very stable. I have never seen it go down, not once."

"Zscaler Private Access is a platform that eliminates the complexity of VPN configuration."

"With SASE, we have a single platform that covers multiple task services with which we need to control access. All the features are equally valuable."

"It does the job. What it is needed for. I can use it for VPN, I can use it for secure connections, I can use it as a firewall. So the solution does the job."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange pros

Cons

"Lookout was moving into the SSE space. And so their work on SecureWeb Gateway and SD-WAN is still sort of evolving."

"The stability depends on the service from where you access it. Because sometimes, the place you are in, you have Gateway. You don't have Gateway. The gateway is overutilized. At the end, you need to go through their gateways. And this is the key point here. You have a tracking point. If it's not well orchestrated, and it scales up as you add more to the existing team, you will suffer"

"We just submitted an enhancement request reflecting the main area we want to see improvement in; the APIs. Currently, we're able to build dashboards, but it's somewhat backward because we use our MDM API to create them. Lookout should provide API to customers so we can query our data and use it in our cloud, and this is the only outstanding area for improvement with the product right now."

"From the analysis that we've done, they do seem to be maybe a step behind in trying to enter the market with a new solution. But when they do pick up, they do come out with some good products."

"Improvement in the solution is required in certain areas where the product does not provide access to its direct end users, who use the portal as an administrator."

"The accuracy could be improved."

"The solution needs to improve its on-premise detection technique."

"Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway needs to integrate IoT, which can help to control devices."

"The stability of the solution to be very good. It is not the best and could improve but it is better than other solutions, such as Forcepoint."

"The solution lacks a good reporting feature."

"Since they have the Netskope client, adding some functionality in the endpoint would be good."

"Netskope can only provide the high level related to threats."

More Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway cons

"The granularity in blocking is not sufficient, as new domains are automatically blocked for 30 days without further information."

"The area that requires improvement is their support. The current support is lacking."

"Zscaler Private Access needs to improve its collaboration with applications without compromising security."

"To enhance their offering, it is advisable for them to focus on strengthening the foundation of their architecture. Additionally, they should consider integrating a broader range of services that go beyond what managed service providers typically offer independently."

"There could be more DLP-related features. Additionally, there needs to be flexibility for integrating ISP features."

"There are latency issues with the solution. They are small, however, they are there when you compare it to other vendors."

"Setup is a bit complex because there are many steps that need to be taken before onboarding and activating the solution."

"While Zscaler supports client-initiated connections, it does not support server-initiated connections. This is a feature that Zscaler may consider adding in the future."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of feature performance versus cost, they're a good value."

"The pricing is fair; it's comparable to our previous solution, and we carried out multiple POCs and POVs (proof of value). The product is worth the money we pay for it."

"The licensing costs are good. Prisma has much more options and support for security, but it has a higher cost. For example, Lookout costs 2/3rd of Prisma's licensing price."

"Lookout is definitely on the lower end when it comes to price point and that seems to be the only differentiator. The technology is in place in this space and it's really about who is coming in at the better price point now."

"We pay a licensing fee of $10,000 on a yearly basis."

"The license model is based on the number of users. You have the possibility to have 10,000 users if you wish."

"The solution's overall cost is cheaper than regular web security solutions."

"The product is cheap."

"The price is average. Because the license is user-based, you can increase it as per the user quantity."

"The pricing is quite high, especially when it comes to the gateway."

"Zscaler Private Access is extremely expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

"There is definitely an ROI."

"The price is competitive."

"Zscaler SASE software is quite expensive compared to other solutions"

"The pricing is expensive and on the higher end. Honestly, in my opinion, it is not worth the price."

"Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lookout?

The solution is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lookout?

The licensing costs are good. Prisma has much more options and support for security, but it has a higher cost. For ex...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lookout?

The solution could improve identity integration as well. Zero trust, it's a good start as a zero-trust solution. More...

See all answers

What do you like most about Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway?

There are a lot of features, but the groups that are created for the policy groups available with Netskope are alread...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway?

I would rate the pricing a four out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is very expensive. It is a cheap licensing fee...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway?

There is room for improvement in streamlining policies. If I compare it with other products, the groups and are a lit...

See all answers

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure ac...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zscaler SASE?

The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler SASE?

Zscaler SASE is quite expensive compared to other solutions. The price is not fixed and it does not include all of th...

See all answers

Comparisons

Check Point Harmony Mobile vs Lookout

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Lookout

Compared 14% of the time

Zimperium vs Lookout

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Lookout

Compared 10% of the time

Skyhigh Security vs Lookout

Compared 2% of the time

More Lookout Competitors

Symantec Proxy vs Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate SWG vs Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway

Compared 13% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

Trend Micro Web Security vs Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway

Compared 2% of the time

More Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange

Compared 19% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange

Compared 10% of the time

Axis Security vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange

Compared 8% of the time

Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Access vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange

Compared 5% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Lookout

June 2024

Download Lookout product report

Buyer's Guide

Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway

May 2024

Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway report

Download Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange

May 2024

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange product report

Also Known As

CipherCloud

No data available

Zscaler SASE

Learn More

Lookout

Netskope

Zscaler

Overview

Lookout is a well-established and powerful secure web gateway (SWG) solution that protects more than 200 million users from threats that can result from the penetration of unsecured web traffic into their networks. Lookout is designed to enable organizations to work remotely while maintaining a tight blanket of security over their confidential business data. It provides administrators with security that extends from their endpoints to the cloud service that they are using to run their organization’s network.

Users of Lookout are able to proactively detect threats and keep themselves secure from a field of threats that constantly evolves. IT teams can protect their organizations without having to rely on any other security solutions. This singular solution can run on multiple kinds of mobile devices. The privacy of individuals is preserved while keeping compliance rules intact. Additionally, users gain access to a number of tools that enable them to prevent security breaches from taking place.

Lookout Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying Lookout include:

Ease of deployment. Lookout is a solution whose design makes it easy for users to deploy it. It provides users with simple, step-by-step instructions that remove the need for organizations to devote extensive amounts of time to make sure that it is properly set up. Anyone can quickly set up the solution without undergoing technical training.

Built-in support. Users of the Lookout application have access to built-in demos that can teach them how to use various solution features. Instead of spending time trying to figure out the application, users can watch the demo that is most relevant to them and see for themselves how that particular feature is used.

Easy-to-use user interface. Lookout’s user interface is laid out in an intuitive way that makes it easy for administrators to navigate. This interface is present in both the mobile and desktop versions of this solution.

Settings customization. Lookout has a built-in settings customization menu. This makes it possible for administrators to easily customize their settings so that they best conform to their needs.

Lookout Features

Activity monitoring and activity tracking. Lookout’s activity monitoring and activity tracking capabilities enable users to keep a close eye on the activities that are taking place in their networks. IT teams and administrators have the ability to watch their networks for any unusual activity. These features ensure that organizations can keep ahead of any potential threats. They provide the kinds of insights and warnings that make the jobs of those IT teams and administrators much easier and more streamlined.

Encryption. Organizations that employ Lookout can encrypt their networks and keep crucial business data from being read by unauthorized parties. This feature keeps the secrets organizations are trying to keep out of the wrong hands.

Anti-virus tools. Lookout provides users with tools to block threats from harming their networks. These tools can successfully block 99.6 percent of threats without raising false alarms.

Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is a comprehensive cloud-based security solution that provides advanced threat protection, data loss prevention, and web filtering capabilities. It offers real-time visibility and control over web traffic, enabling organizations to enforce policies and protect against web-based threats. The solution uses machine learning and behavioral analysis to detect and block advanced threats, including malware, phishing, and ransomware. It also provides granular control over web access, allowing organizations to block or allow specific websites and applications based on user, group, or location. With Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, organizations can ensure compliance with industry regulations and protect sensitive data from unauthorized access or exfiltration. The solution is easy to deploy and manage, with a user-friendly interface and centralized policy management.

The Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enables fast, secure connections and allows your employees to work from anywhere using the internet as the corporate network. Based on the zero trust principle of least-privileged access, it provides comprehensive security using context-based identity and policy enforcement.

The Zero Trust Exchange operates across 150 data centers worldwide, ensuring that the service is close to your users, co-located with the cloud providers and applications they are accessing, such as Microsoft 365 and AWS. It guarantees the shortest path between your users and their destinations, providing comprehensive security and an amazing user experience.

Sample Customers

Arrow, Cloudrise, Sainsbury, Evalueserve, Stroock, Apria, Ather Energy, CSA, AVX Corporation Nuna, City of San Diego Case, Genomic Health Case Study, Oak Hill Advisors, MaRS Discovery District.

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

May 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG). Updated: May 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.