OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText DevPartner comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Ranking in Test Management Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
197
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (5th)
OpenText DevPartner
Ranking in Test Management Tools
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the market share of OpenText ALM / Quality Center is 14.9% and it decreased by 1.5% compared to the previous year. The market share of OpenText DevPartner is 0.5% and it increased by Infinity% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
Unique Categories:
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
4.7%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

PT
Jun 21, 2022
Helpful for data management but outdated and lacking in Agile features
I primarily use ALM Quality Center as a conversion tool Previously, we stored our test cases and results in Excel sheets, which was difficult to manage. Implementing ALM Quality Center has allowed us to map our requirements with test cases and use cases properly. ALM Quality Center's best…
Use OpenText DevPartner?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Seat and concurrent licensing models exist; the latter is recommended if a large number of different users will be utilizing the product."
"The enterprise pricing and licensing are reasonable."
"ALM Quality Center is a little bit costly."
"Depending on the volume, the annual maintenance costs vary on a percentage but it's around $300 a year per license for maintenance. It's at 18% of the total cost of the license."
"Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive."
"The cost of licensing depends on the number of VMs that you are running test cases on and it is not cheap."
"It all comes down to how many people are going to access the tool. When teams go above 20, I think ALM is a better tool to use from a collaboration and streamlining perspective."
"I don't know the exact numbers, but I know it is pricey. When we talked to the sales reps we work with from our company, they say, "Well, Micro Focus will never lose on price." So, they are willing to do a lot of negotiating if it is required."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
55%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Has anyone tried integrating HP ALM and JIRA ?
HP ALM and Jira can be easily integrated with the aid of a third-party Integration Solution. To help you select the right integration approach and tool, you should first define your integration req...
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
It was expensive for us. For the first two weeks, we had to employ people now and then as the system needed to be more accurate. It cost us a lot of money. I rate the solution's pricing as a seven ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM
Micro Focus DevPartner, DevPartner
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
InSightec Ltd, Synergex
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.