Oracle Coherence vs VMware Tanzu Data Services comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Coherence
Ranking in Database Development and Management
22nd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
In-Memory Data Store Services (9th)
VMware Tanzu Data Services
Ranking in Database Development and Management
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (5th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Database Development and Management category, the market share of Oracle Coherence is 1.1% and it increased by 91.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of VMware Tanzu Data Services is 3.6% and it decreased by 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database Development and Management
Unique Categories:
In-Memory Data Store Services
6.4%
Data Warehouse
8.1%
Message Queue (MQ) Software
5.2%
 

Featured Reviews

it_user514590 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 19, 2016
Pro-active caching improved risk calculation time and allowed the risk grid to scale with volume growth.
Oracle Coherence is mature and feature-rich product. However, there are a few old pain points. One pain point is cluster configuration. On complex projects, it is a challenge to consistently maintain custom Coherence XML and the rest of application configuration (often based on a Spring framework). Another pain point is testing. Due to internal implementation, it is impossible to start multiple Coherence nodes in a single JVM without special tricks. Multi-node test setup is important if the application is exploiting advanced features of the product. This is somehow addressed by the community (there are three open-source frameworks for testing Coherence), but the problem could have been solved by Oracle once and for all.
Erick  Karanja - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 11, 2024
Management interface is cool and offers good features like dead-lettering (DLXs) and more
I like many features in RabbitMQ. Number one, reliability for the messages is key. RabbitMQ ensures your messages are safe. They are not deleted and stuff. Number two, they have a very good feature called Retrying messages – it's all about retries. You can easily retry a message through RabbitMQ. So, if processing fails, you can push the message back into RabbitMQ. Maybe you can re-consume it and so on. They also have features like tags, which we call "dead-lettering (DLXs)." If it's approved, it means the messages have been delivered. If it's false or missing the first time you get it, you can make decisions based on that. The feature assigned to code for it is called the dead-letter queue. Moreover, the management interface is so cool. It's simple. It's able to give us an overview of the messages that have been consumed, pending messages, messages that have been delivered, messages that have been acknowledged, and so on. We can also extend that management to tools like... we can extend the management through, like, Kibana or Grafana

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Technical support from Oracle is okay."
"The solution improved our site reliability."
"The solution is stable."
"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."
"Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"
"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."
"The stability of this solution was very good."
"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
 

Cons

"This platform has issues with stability and performance."
"VMware RabbitMQ needs to create a new queue system."
"Tanzu Greenplum's compression for GPText could be made more efficient."
"Some integration with other platforms like design tools, and ETL development tools, that will enable some advanced functionality, like fully down processing, etc."
"The user interface could be improved."
"I saw some limitation with respect to the column store, and removing this would be an improvement."
"Maintenance is time-consuming."
"I’d like this dashboard to use web sockets, so it would actually be in real time. It would slightly increase debugging, etc."
"They should add more analytics. Their documentation could also be improved so that I don't have to bother my co-workers and tech support so often."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."
"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."
"This is an open source solution."
"It is an open-source product."
"The pricing is okay."
"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."
"The price is pretty good."
"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
36%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?
It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.
 

Also Known As

Coherence
Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Industrial Bank of Korea, Hotelbeds, Canon Inc., Verizon, Securitas Direct Espa_a, S.A.U., CetelemEspa_aGrupo BNP Paribas, Telus
General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Services and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.