Oracle Database as a Service vs SQL Azure comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Database as a Service
Ranking in Database as a Service
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SQL Azure
Ranking in Database as a Service
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
90
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Database as a Service category, the market share of Oracle Database as a Service is 5.7% and it decreased by 30.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of SQL Azure is 17.7% and it decreased by 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database as a Service
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Robin Saikat Chatterjee - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 16, 2016
You can run it on the Oracle public cloud.
It provides the ability to run from a simple schema base to a real application database, including the option to run it on the Oracle public cloud. In cases where the customer has an issue with data locality or privacy, the option to seamlessly switch to a Oracle public cloud machine in the…
AM
Feb 21, 2023
The SQL connector effectively syncs data to databases
Our company uses the solution for on-premises production and PR. We sync data from the database service to our on-premises SQL server.  The SQL connector effectively syncs data to our database.  The default 1433 port for communication should be customizable because most hacks or attacks are…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup is not too difficult, and on a scale from one to ten with one being the most difficult and ten being the easiest, I'd rate it at eight. The initial deployment can be done in an hour."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Database as a Service are the power, security, and performance."
"What I like about Oracle Database as a Service is that it has excellent stability, and the development is effortless. I also like the enhanced queries in Oracle Database as a Service best."
"It is a good solution and has a large community."
"Improves client satisfaction by decreasing their problems."
"The scalability and high availability are the most valuable features of Oracle DaaS."
"The solution's scalability and flexibility are very good and implementation is easy."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Database as a Service is that it is managed by the vendor and you do not have to purchase on-premise hardware."
"The hardware is all managed by Microsoft."
"Its performance is good. It has a lot of features. It has the backup feature, which is not there in Amazon RDS. In Azure SQL, there is an option to replicate and restore a database point to point, whereas we can't do that with Amazon RDS."
"The solution has become easier to use over time and it's also reasonably priced."
"We like the ease of integrating it with our on-premises environment. We use a hybrid model. We have a SQL Server on-premises, and we have an integration with the cloud version. We do CPU or disk intensive processes on-premises. For accessibility, we offload onto the cloud. When you do a lot of IO and things like that in the cloud, Microsoft charges for the CPU activity."
"The backup solution in Azure is great, the firewall settings in SQL are very easy to use and work very well. Additionally, the turning process is very good and has improved the SQL services and queries."
"SQL is a simpler database. We use it more than other databases."
"It is very fast in replicating the data from one database to another. We do some extractions from multiple databases to a target database that we use for visualization. It has a good speed."
"It's the type of product that doesn't need much technical support assistance as it works seamlessly."
 

Cons

"The ROI has not been good."
"An 8GB download for software is far too big. Nowadays it should be possible to simply use RPM packages on Linux/Unix."
"The solution is not very stable."
"I would like to improve the stability of the Oracle database."
"I would like to see a better dashboard for the storage. It need to be more complete overall."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The solution’s price could be reduced."
"The tool needs to improve its pricing and stability."
"The solution could be less expensive. They need to work on their pricing model."
"There are some limitations for cross-database queries and features. The migration of data from older systems should be easier. For deployment, there are too many options, which sometimes makes it difficult to figure out the best option. There is not enough information to help you to find the best option for deployment. There should be more documentation about this."
"The default 1433 port for communication should be customizable because most hacks or attacks are attempted when creating any application or database on the default port."
"I haven't explored SQL Azure's features much, but I would like to see some better integration with Python."
"I would like to see integration with Snowflake."
"Integration needs to be improved for this solution."
"The solution can be improved by reducing the constraints available."
"The way it has been designed, in the on-premises deployments, the underlying Windows OS is highly scalable but has a very large resource requirement. A lot of power-related and memory-related things are there, which I have not seen in the RHEL and Oracle. I have not tried SQL on RHEL EXEC. On Windows, infrastructure-wise, a very large workload is running on the SQL. This issue is related to Windows, not SQL."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle Database as a Service is always a bit costly, but it's an excellent service. My company used the on-premises version, and that was costly."
"Oracle Database as a Service's pricing is good."
"The solution is quite expensive but worth the money."
"The solution's price is reasonable but depends upon the negotiation."
"The price of Oracle Database as a Service is reasonable."
"The pricing may seem expensive, but the value corresponds to the quality of the product."
"What has been done is that an annual subscription model has been launched, which includes the payment of both the AML (Annual Maintenance Fee) and the subscription fee, paid on a yearly basis."
"There should be a standard way to license the database in a virtual environment (e.g. VMware) and there should be a low-end version (like Standard Edition One) again."
"We have had some issues with the licensing of the solution."
"It is expensive. Snowflake and PostgreSQL are cheaper than this. Google is also cheaper than Azure. Its licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis. It is based on usage and storage."
"It is reasonable."
"There is a license required to use the solution and it cost $30 to do the installation."
"I have an annual spend number, and it is in the hundred thousand dollar range. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing fees. Even though you have to look at the cost numbers of what you're going to be charged on a monthly basis, what you have to also remember is that your application may need a lot of rewriting and things like that. You get charged not just for the monthly costs but also for the transactions that occur. If your access to the data layer is not so efficient, your costs will go up because you're pulling far more data than you potentially need. These are hidden costs that nobody ever considers. If your application is not written very efficiently, you may actually increase your costs over on-prem versus cloud."
"It is beneficial in terms of cost because you are charged per data unit instead of licensing."
"In terms of the cost, SQL Azure is a pay-per-use solution, particularly because it's a cloud subscription, so you pay as much as you use it."
"The pricing is flexible and can be adapted based on our requirements but the pricing options are complex especially if we are using a VM."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
62%
Computer Software Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Retailer
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Database as a Service?
It has significantly enhanced our application development process by introducing substantial time savings and streamlining routine tasks.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database as a Service?
It is an expensive product. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.
What needs improvement with Oracle Database as a Service?
Improvement in Oracle DBaaS could focus on enhancing performance monitoring and reporting tools. A more streamlined utility tool would be beneficial, reducing the need for manual intervention in ad...
What do you like most about SQL Azure?
The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SQL Azure?
I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially.
What needs improvement with SQL Azure?
The product's pricing needs improvement.
 

Also Known As

Oracle DBaaS, Oracle Database Cloud
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Solution-Soft, DX Marketing, Suredell and Partners, Frontiers, SettleOurEstate.com, Demand Analysis Ltd, endlich IT & Projekt Service OHG
adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Database as a Service vs. SQL Azure and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.