Oracle Multitenant vs SQL Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Multitenant
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
16th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SQL Server
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
260
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the market share of Oracle Multitenant is 0.3% and it decreased by 56.6% compared to the previous year. The market share of SQL Server is 22.8% and it increased by 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

PatrickKuria - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 2, 2022
Feature-rich with security and good reliability
It's database software, so it's usually used for enterprise applications, for example, to ensure that you mostly use Oracle. In our country, it's mainly used by financial institutions I do like the security features and data recovery for features that were enabled there. With the right…
Karoly Krokovay - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 16, 2022
Highly stable and secure, but stability could improve
We developed a product for banks and we store the data in SQL Server SQL Server has good performance, but it could be better. I have been using SQL Server for a couple of years. The stability of SQL Server is very important for us because we provide services for banks. The banks need a secure…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"You can scale the solution as needed."
"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"
"The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine."
"Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us."
"The most valuable features are the speed and ease of use."
"It's easy to use and works great."
"Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases."
"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."
"Having everything in one centralized set of databases is the most valuable feature."
"SQL Server is quite stable. And now we are using the Lattice 2017 version."
"Agent service is a good feature of SQL Server, where you can schedule certain tasks."
"I love SQL Server's Common Table Expression. In addition to that, I like its lead and lag functions. That helped us reduce a lot of code when comparing rows in SQL Server."
"The security and vulnerability management are well-managed through the vendor."
"I like the availability group functionality. We are setting up more clusters using availability groups. The enterprise licensing or Software Assurance makes it a little bit cheaper as well. It is nice to have that read-only copy for reporting and everything else."
"The most valuable feature of SQL Server is that it is easy to set up."
"The performance of the SQL Server is very good."
 

Cons

"The user interface for this solution can be made better."
"The solution lacks a GUI for commands."
"This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."
"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve."
"Technical support could be faster."
"While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive."
"It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it."
"It can be complicated to scale up the solution, but it's scalable."
"The installation process should be simplified."
"One thing I don't like about SQL Server is the way they've set up security with users and groups. It just doesn't seem that intuitive to me. Adding some more explanatory information might help some."
"In the next release, I would like to see a better user interface and a familiar syntax."
"Other than Synapse and the other version of SQL Server, they face some problems while processing the data."
"SQL Server has good performance, but it could be better."
"More things in SQL Server need to be automated."
"I would like Microsoft to evolve SQL Server because stateful databases dying are in a way. We would like to find out if it can absorb Hadoop and other similar things. They should make it useful for data mining. Data is evolving forever, and how we store it is also changing constantly. So, SQL Server also needs to change."
"The performance degrades when the data is huge."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is a little bit pricey."
"For me, I will go with it if I have the budget. Some features are nicer than before, but at the end of the day, you always have a limited budget. I prefer to upgrade and get a specific hardware when possible. At the end, you will have to make a compromise. You will not get everything you would have liked to have."
"The licensing price could be better, more user-friendly."
"SQL Server's pricing has proven satisfactory for our market range."
"The price of the solution is very expensive. If I went with the cloud version of SQL a license would cost me approximately 11,000 Riyals per month."
"We have had to purchase the Enterprise version to the tune of a few hundred thousand dollars, which is just ridiculous."
"For licensing, we pay yearly. The licensing is very expensive, and it should be cheaper."
"If you are looking for a small setup and do not want an open-source solution or invest too much money in your database then SQL Server is a very good choice."
"The price could always be lower."
"Cost is a major derivative for any organization. It has a reasonable cost value, and its cloud support is also better than others. Comparatively, Oracle can do the same things or is even better in certain areas, but it is expensive. The cost along with the support are the plus factors for SQL Server."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

Akın Kurtulan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 9, 2022
Jun 9, 2022
Hi Martin, it is no marketing rumor. Oracle is the number one in terms of big databases and scalability. But as I wrote, Microsoft is always one step behind. So if the price is no question and you need the best on the market, Oracle is the choice. But to use the full power, you need someone who knows how to plan and set up the whole environment! The planning starts with a look at your amount ...
2 out of 3 answers
PG
Jun 7, 2022
Hi Akin, First, both DBs manage your relational data on several operating systems (Linux, Windows Server, ...) and as Cloud Services. The newer architecture of Oracle tries to support you in a mixed environment where you can distribute a large DB over your own servers and cloud services. But as we always saw in the past, if a new feature of Oracle is good, Microsoft will follow. So your main questions should be: -How big is your DB? The bigger, the more I suggest Oracle. -Are you in a mixed world (Cloud and your own servers)? If Cloud is Azure, I think SQL Server is a good choice. -Is the price a topic? The liscence rules of Oracle are sometimes complicated. Hope this helps a little.  
Martin Zwarthoed - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 8, 2022
Hi Akin, Without going into the technical details; did you have a look a the pricing of MSSQL and Oracle databases?  I always hear that the Oracle database is better than MS SQL. But I never got to test this myself. What I do know is that when I tell a customer the Oracle pricing, they are usually going in another direction.  You must have a very good functional reason to go for Oracle considering the price difference. As @Patric Gehl ​suggested: a very big database is good but for a good reason. Kind regards, Martin Zwarthoed
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
43%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Multitenant?
The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Multitenant?
Oracle Multitenant is suitable mainly for large enterprises due to its high cost and resource demands. There are additional fees beyond standard licensing, which makes it expensive.
What needs improvement with Oracle Multitenant?
While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive.
Would you say the price of SQL Server is high compared to that of similar products?
SQL Server is fairly priced because it has various editions, depending on the number of users, servers, or core packs you are using. If you compare the product to others in this category, the price...
Has using SQL Server helped your organization in any way?
SQL Server has helped my organization through partitioning to distribute the workload, as it splits them up into smaller pieces so the machines can easily deal with it. However, this comes with a h...
Which authentication mode is best for SQL Server?
My company connects through SQL Server authentication. We have company Windows accounts, but we do not want to connect the two, out of security concerns and to keep things separated for our own pur...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Oracle Pluggable Database
Microsoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

An Post, National Oilwell Varco, SAS Institute, Sportmaster, Y-Telecom
Microsoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Multitenant vs. SQL Server and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.