Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs Tenable.io Container Security comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 11, 2023
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Container Security
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th), Cloud and Data Center Security (7th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Compliance Management (4th)
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Se...
Ranking in Container Security
18th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tenable.io Container Security
Ranking in Container Security
21st
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Container Security category, the market share of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.7% and it increased by 60.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is 6.0% and it increased by 2.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of Tenable.io Container Security is 2.1% and it decreased by 52.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Security
Unique Categories:
Vulnerability Management
1.8%
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

AS
May 9, 2024
Evidence-based reporting shows all the findings and severity, helping us to prioritize issues
We provide cloud services on our site using AWS. Singularity detects flaws that we must close for security reasons. We use Singularity to observe those findings and fix things based on the customer's requirements. Previously, we used to segregate issues and look after them. Singularity helped us secure our infrastructure. We've significantly reduced our potential security breaches to a minimum. It has improved how we operate on a larger scale. We set up the platform, onboarded the info, and then gradually moved further. Over time, it helped us slowly resolve those issues. We were using the cloud platforms' native security tools, but those were unhelpful. Now, we rely on this more than those services. Singularity reduced our false positive rate by about 60 percent. We've had even better results in terms of our risk posture. We can rely on this tool to improve our security conditions on a broader scale. If I gave our security posture a percent rating, I would give it 89 percent. The solution saves time by giving us everything in one place. You don't need to manually check every account. It tells us a lot. Singularity reduces our detection time by about 60 percent. Singularity has improved collaboration among cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams. Previously, it would take around a week for engineers to address issues. Now that we use this tool, we resolve issues in one or two days.
II
Jun 7, 2023
A straightforward solution for vulnerability scanning and monitoring containers
I'm not sure that I can accurately answer what needs improvement because my part of working was integrating. So, I believe the first week, I've never had a lot of problems with Red Hat as much as with the code or writing the programming. The APIs have more access to the data than the web UI. Like, I believe I can do more automatic things with APIs than the WebUI. Also, I can have filtering with more accuracy in APIs than the web UI. So, the aforementioned areas can be considered for improvement. I felt like working with Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security's API, that it's more flexible than working directly with the web UI. The documentation about Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security available online is very limited. But now I remember that it's very limited because it was integrated, and they had bought it from another company. I forgot the name of the other solution. The documentation is an area to focus on because, for a new program, the same developers of the old solution start working at Red Hat Enterprise. So it's very limited to the documentation. It was because it has a straightforward user interface. So, they didn't add or put up some documentation about it except for installation, implementation, and configuration, of course. But, dealing so much with it was hard for me, considering my attempts to find documentation because it was a new product.
Jahanzeb Feroze Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 14, 2023
Improves organizational security with features like scanning, reporting, and troubleshooting
Tenable.io Container Security has improved our security.  The tool's most valuable feature is scanning, reporting, and troubleshooting.  Tenable.io Container Security should improve integration modules. It should also improve stability.  I have been working with the product for two years.  I…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features."
"Support has been very helpful and provides regular feedback and help whenever needed. They've been very useful."
"With PingSafe, it's easy to onboard new accounts."
"As a frequently audited company, we value PingSafe's compliance monitoring features. They give us a report with a compliance score for how well we meet certain regulatory standards, like HIPAA. We can show our compliance as a percentage. It's also a way to show that we are serious about security."
"It is advantageous in terms of time-saving and cost reduction."
"We've seen a reduction in resources devoted to vulnerability monitoring. Before PingSafe we spent a lot of time monitoring and fixing these issues. PingSafe enabled us to divert more resources to the production environment."
"Cloud Native Security's best feature is its ability to identify hard-coded secrets during pull request reviews."
"All the features we use are equal and get the job done."
"Segmentation is the most powerful feature."
"I am impressed with the tool's visibility."
"One of the most valuable features I found was the ability of this solution to map the network and show you the communication between your containers and your different nodes."
"It is easy to install and manage."
"The benefit of working with the solution is the fact that it's very straightforward...It is a perfectly stable product since the details are very accurate."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share resources."
"I like virtualization and all those tools that come with OpenShift. I also like Advanced Cluster Management and the built-in security."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, it is a good solution."
"Nessus scanner is very effective for internal penetration testing."
"Currently, I haven't implemented the solution due to its deprecation by the site. However, I can highlight some benefits of Tenable Cloud Security, a cybersecurity solution with various features for scanning vulnerabilities in both cloud environments and on-premises container security."
"It helps us secure our applications from the build phase and identify the weaknesses from scratch."
"The strong security provided by the product in the container environment is its most valuable feature."
"The tool's most valuable feature is scanning, reporting, and troubleshooting."
"Tenable.io detects misconfiguration when you deploy a Docker or Kubernetes container. It's much better to remedy these issues during deployment instead of waiting until the container is already in the production environment."
 

Cons

"Their search feature could be better."
"We've found a lot of false positives."
"here is a bit of a learning curve. However, you only need two to three days to identify options and get accustomed."
"While it is good, I think the solution's console could be improved."
"PingSafe can improve by eliminating 100 percent of the false positives."
"The Infrastructure as Code service available in PingSafe and the services available in AWS cloud security can be merged so that we can get the security data directly from AWS cloud in PingSafe. This way, all the data related to security will be in one single place. Currently, we have to check a couple of things on PingSafe, and we have to validate that same data on the AWS Cloud to be sure. If they can collaborate like that, it will be great."
"I would like PingSafe's detections to be openly available online instead of only accessible through their portal. Other tools have detections that are openly available without going through the tool."
"Scanning capabilities should be added for the dark web."
"The solution lacks features when compared to some of the competitors such as Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and has room for improvement."
"The documentation about Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security available online is very limited... So it's very limited to the documentation."
"The tool's command line and configuration are hard for us to understand and make deployment complex. It should also include zero trust, access control features and database connectivity."
"The solution's visibility and vulnerability prevention should be improved."
"The testing process could be improved."
"They're trying to convert it to the platform as a source. They are moving in the direction of Cloud Foundry so it can be easier for a developer to deploy it."
"The solution's price could be better."
"The initial setup is pretty complex. There's a learning curve, and its cost varies across different environments. It's difficult."
"I believe integration plays a crucial role for Tenable, particularly in terms of connecting with other products and various container solutions like Docker or Kubernetes. It seems that in future updates, enhanced integration is something I would appreciate. Currently, there is integration with Docker, but when it comes to Kubernetes or other container solutions, it appears to be a challenge, especially with on-prem scanners."
"Tenable.io Container Security should improve integration modules. It should also improve stability."
"I feel that in certain areas this product has false positives which the company should work on. They should also try to include business logic vulnerabilities in the scanner testing. Finally, the vulnerability assessment feature should be increased to other hardware devices, apart from firewalls."
"The support is tricky to reach, so we would like better-oriented technical support enabled."
"They need to work on auto-remediation so it's easier for the security team to act quickly when certain assets or resources are deployed. The latest version has a CIS benchmark that you need to meet for containers in the cloud, but more automation is needed."
"The stability and setup phase of the product are areas with shortcomings where improvements are needed."
"The initial setup is highly complex."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing is okay. It is in line with what other providers were providing. It is not cheap. It is not expensive."
"Singularity Cloud Workload Security's licensing and price were cheaper than the other solutions we looked at."
"Their pricing appears to be based simply on the number of accounts we have, which is common for cloud-based products."
"PingSafe is less expensive than other options."
"Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is cost-efficient."
"As a partner, we receive a discount on the licenses."
"It's a fair price for what you get. We are happy with the price as it stands."
"PingSafe falls within the typical price range for cloud security platforms."
"The pricing model is moderate, meaning it is not very expensive."
"Red Hat offers two pricing options for their solution: a separate price, and a bundled price under the OpenShift Platform Plus."
"We purchase a yearly basis license for the solution."
"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."
"It's best to be an institutional buyer and directly contact the sales team as they can provide over-the-top discounts for bulk orders."
"I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten."
"The product does not operate on a pay-per-license model."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
When I joined my organization, I saw that PingSafe was already implemented. I started to use the tool's alerting feat...
What do you like most about Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes?
I like virtualization and all those tools that come with OpenShift. I also like Advanced Cluster Management and the b...
What needs improvement with Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes?
The solution's visibility and vulnerability prevention should be improved.
What is your primary use case for Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes?
Red Hat can be utilized for anything, including OpenShift, Kubernetes, dev environments, automation, banking, and man...
What do you like most about Tenable.io Container Security?
The tool's most valuable feature is scanning, reporting, and troubleshooting.
What needs improvement with Tenable.io Container Security?
Tenable.io Container Security should improve integration modules. It should also improve stability.
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
StackRox
Tenable FlawCheck, FlawCheck
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
City National Bank, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
ServiceMaster
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs. Tenable.io Container Security and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.